search for: comatibility

I have setup a Samba PDC with LDAP by the Samba howto. All is working fine. But when I try to add machine accounts it is giving me errors. The error is as such First I did #smbldap-useradd -w comat67$ This was successful. Then when I do this oblix:/home# pdbedit -a -m -u comat67$ Searching for:[(&(objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=COMAT))] smbldap_open_connection: connection

Hi, I''d like to use psad from www.cipherdyne.com that analyze iptables log messages on my firewall-shorewall. It complains to incorrectly configured iptables when starting. This is the message : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** The INPUT chain in the iptables ruleset on debian4 includes a default LOG rule for all

Hi, I have a puppet master and agent installed. I want to generate and configure master-agent certificate and followed the steps: Master: ========== 1. Cleaned up all certificate on Master: [root@puppet-server manifests]# puppet cert sign --all No waiting certificate requests to sign [root@puppet-server manifests]# puppet cert clean --all notice: Revoked

Hi all, I'm thingking og switching all the test scripts to use /bin/bash instead of /bin/sh. The main reason is that /bin/sh on linux can mean one of two things; bash in bourne shell comatibility mode or dash. These two behave differently enough to make it a pain to be always testing them. The other issue is that using some bash features will allow me to reuse code and reduce the amount of shell script that needs to be mainatained. Does anyone see any major problems with this? Cheers, Er...

Op 25-11-14 om 23:39 schreef Jan Stary: > Is there a reason the test scripts are calling bash? The change from sh to bash was made a little more than a year ago. The mailing list thread accompanying this change can be found here: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-September/004374.html

> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 07:10, Tom Eastep wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 06:59, Tom Eastep wrote: > > > On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 06:52, Petr Novák wrote: > > > > > > > Is there a way for shorewall to be comatible with psad ? > > > > > > >From the above messages, it doesn''t seem likely. > > > > > > >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I changed all rules to drop (Even the one in shorewall.conf) .. And PSAD works great with Shorewall here ... Although that might not be what you want. Lady Linux At 10:43 AM 9/19/2003, you wrote: >Is there a way for shorewall to be comatible with psad ? >thanks & regards >Petr Novak "No Problems Only Solutions"

...than a year > ago. The mailing list thread accompanying this change can be > found here: > http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-September/004374.html How unfortunate, if I may say so. The main reason is that /bin/sh on linux can mean one of two things; bash in bourne shell comatibility mode or dash. To accomodate a perverse system where /bin/sh does not mean sh(1), but one of two other shells (!), compatibility is broken for systems that either do not come with bash or install it anywhere else but /bin/bash. The other issue is that using some bash features will allow me to re...

JdL> I've always been afraid to ask, but here goes... JdL> What's the advantage of GUEST_SESSSETUP being a compile time parameter, JdL> instead of having it as an smb.conf parameter? I'd like to second this question! Also, just in case that it will not become an smb.conf parameter: can't it be added as a comment to the Makefile (probably near the comments to

CentOS4 RPMS for x86-64 would be awesome. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tony Hoover, Network Administrator KSU - Salina, College of Technology and Aviation (785) 826-2660 "Don't Blend in..." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From:

Hello List, In regards to RPM packages, what is the difference in the prebuilt ones for example the FC5 RPM's directly from samba.org or obtaining the latest .tar.gz and running ./makerpms.sh for the desired distribution. Does this way optimize for example - x86-64 or SMP ? Cheers, Adrian Sender. -----Original Message----- From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:jerry@samba.org] Sent:

...list thread accompanying this change can be > > found here: > > http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-September/004374.html > > How unfortunate, if I may say so. > > The main reason is that /bin/sh on linux can mean one of > two things; bash in bourne shell comatibility mode or dash. > > To accomodate a perverse system where /bin/sh does not mean sh(1), > but one of two other shells (!), compatibility is broken > for systems that either do not come with bash > or install it anywhere else but /bin/bash. > > The other issue is that using some...

Hello, Can somebody of the Samba team explain me the difference of Fedora packages or Enterprise packages ( <http://enterprisesamba.com/> http://enterprisesamba.com/) of Samba on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4? I tried to find any information about this subject, but googleing doesn't help me. The standard Samba package (3.0.10EL) of RHEL4 doesn't communicate with a W2k3 server

using samba and ldap - redhat 7.3 trying to work on a short cgi to update samba password (it is a url with attributes username and password). I am not very good at all with perl, so if someone can take a quick ponder and help me out, that would be great. I think that it fails in theory however, because to change other users password, you need to be root ... So I was wondering if anyone knows

Dear alltogether, I experience very strange behavior of imputation of NA's with the NORM library. I use R 2.2.0, win32. The code is below and the same dataset was also tried with MICE and aregImpute() from HMISC _without_ any problem. The problem is as follows: (1) using the whole dataset results in very strange imputations - values far beyond the maximum of the respective column, >