search for: colucci

...ses] [moh_files] default => /var/lib/asterisk/mohmp3 and I added this in sip.conf: musiconhold=default The directory I specified contains the three standard files but all this doesn't work when I try to put a call on hold. Does anyone have some idea about? Thanks in advance, Gianluca Colucci

On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 13:41:42 +0200 Alexandre Colucci <timac at timac.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently studying the possibility to make the transition from > gcc 4.2 to llvm-gcc 4.2 for the projects I am working on. Since you are switching compilers, why not switch to clang instead of llvm-gcc? Best regards, --Edwin

Good morning to all, I work for a bank in Italy, I want to know if i can install R and relative add on like Rbloomberg for free or my company has to pay some fee. tanks to all. Stefano Colucci ------------------------------------------------------ Scegli infostrada: ADSL gratis per tutta l?estate e telefoni senza canone Telecom http://click.libero.it/infostrada

...egotiation state, cannot continue. In my sip.config general section I have added this lines t38pt_udptl=yes t38pt_rtp=no t38pt_tcp=no If I comment this lines, the fax is sended by G711 but this modality is too slow and instable. How can I do to solve this problem? Thank you Dott. Marcello Colucci Microsoft Certified Professional (70-176/70-155/70-100) MColucci at SIRIOInformatica.it ----------------------------------------------------------------- SIRIO Informatica s.a.s. P.za Pericle Fazzini, 8 63039 San Benedetto del Tronto (AP) Tel.: 0039-0735-56.83.75 oppure 0039-06-916.503.224...

Hi, llvm-gcc 4.2 generates warnings when I compile inline assembly code that contains used labels with -Wunused-label. The generated code seems to work yet. gcc 4.2 doesn't generate those warnings. I haven't found any bugs regarding this issue in the llvm bug database. Does anyone know if this is a known llvm issue? Is it a warning that I can ignore and does not affect the generated

Hi, I am currently studying the possibility to make the transition from gcc 4.2 to llvm-gcc 4.2 for the projects I am working on. These projects are huge projects, most of the source code is written in C++ but we have objc, c and assembly code. We are targeting MacOSX 10.5 and MacOSX 10.6. Our build system is currently running on MacOSX 10.5 and uses Xcode 3.1.4 with gcc 4.2. It is used to

Good morning, (sorry for my english) i have some problems to put off by extimation ARIMA coefficients the ones not significatives. Exist a method to extimate only that significatives? i use the command: arima(). thanks to all Stefano [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

This is fixed in TOT (rev 107051 for C, 108732 for C++) On Jul 23, 2010, at 2:20 AMPDT, Alexandre Colucci wrote: > Hi, > > llvm-gcc 4.2 generates warnings when I compile inline assembly code > that contains used labels with -Wunused-label. The generated code > seems to work yet. gcc 4.2 doesn't generate those warnings. I > haven't found any bugs regarding this issue in...

On 10.10.2011, at 16:10, Alexandre Colucci wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently making the transition from gcc 4.2 to clang for the projects (mostly C++) I am working on. > I think I discovered a major optimization bug in Clang++. I managed to create a simple (60 lines of code) test case which exhibits the issue. > > When yo...

...ode we use) contains gcc predefined macro and we also have some third party libraries. With llvm-gcc we would keep the gcc parser which means less compatibility issues. - I am not sure if clang can generate code that runs on 10.5. Alexandre > On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 13:41:42 +0200 > Alexandre Colucci <timac at timac.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am currently studying the possibility to make the transition from >> gcc 4.2 to llvm-gcc 4.2 for the projects I am working on. > > Since you are switching compilers, why not switch to clang instead of > llvm-g...

...ashes: LLVM breaks existing source code. Alexandre > The problem is in your code, not the compiler. You're casting an unaligned char* to an int*, even though an int* pointer must be 4-byte aligned in every ARM ABI that I've ever seen. > > On Jan 23, 2012, at 6:14 AM, Alexandre Colucci wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I think I discovered a major armv7 optimization bug in Clang. I create a simple test case which exhibits the issue. >> When you compile the attached file for armv7 with optimizations turned on (O2, O3 or Os), the binary generated led to a crash. &g...

The problem is in your code, not the compiler. You're casting an unaligned char* to an int*, even though an int* pointer must be 4-byte aligned in every ARM ABI that I've ever seen. On Jan 23, 2012, at 6:14 AM, Alexandre Colucci wrote: > Hi, > > I think I discovered a major armv7 optimization bug in Clang. I create a simple test case which exhibits the issue. > When you compile the attached file for armv7 with optimizations turned on (O2, O3 or Os), the binary generated led to a crash. > The issue can'...

Hi, I think I discovered a major armv7 optimization bug in Clang. I create a simple test case which exhibits the issue. When you compile the attached file for armv7 with optimizations turned on (O2, O3 or Os), the binary generated led to a crash. The issue can't be reproduced when using GCC 4.2. It can't be reproduced with Clang when the optimization is turned off (O0). This issue can be

Hi, I am currently making the transition from gcc 4.2 to clang for the projects (mostly C++) I am working on. I think I discovered a major optimization bug in Clang++. I managed to create a simple (60 lines of code) test case which exhibits the issue. When you compile this file for i386 with optimizations turned on (O2, O3 or Os), you get an unexpected result. When you compile it for x86_64, or

On Jul 24, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Alexandre Colucci wrote: > > There are several reasons why I am currently not considering the transition to Clang (although I would love to switch to it): > > - Clang (LLVM compiler 2.x) is only integrated by default in Xcode 4 which has not been released yet. I guess it might be possible to use Clang...

On Jul 24, 2010, at 4:41 AM, Alexandre Colucci wrote: > I am currently studying the possibility to make the transition from gcc 4.2 to llvm-gcc 4.2 for the projects I am working on. > These projects are huge projects, most of the source code is written in C++ but we have objc, c and assembly code. We are targeting MacOSX 10.5 and MacOSX 1...

Hi everyone, I'd like to implement with * a "Reservation call on busy" service. Have you got any ideas? Does exist any application that can do this? ... or any perl script+ AGI module? by Gianluca

I've got the same problem. MusicOnHold works if I use something like: Exten => 1111,1,MusicOnHold() but if I try to answer a call and then transfer or put on hold the call, I get no music. Does anyone have any idea? Bye, Gianluca. _____ Da: Kanishka Somaratne [mailto:kani@technoportal.biz] Inviato: gioved? 17 marzo 2005 5.53 A: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

Hey, My projects are not compiling on 10.5 using llvm-gcc 4.2 in Xcode 3.1.4. These are caused by some llvm bugs that are now fixed. Since Apple will not release a Xcode update for 10.5, I am trying to compile a recent version of llvm-gcc 4.2 (from the LLVM 2.7 branch - but I could use ToT if this helps) to use on 10.5 intel. I easily built llvm-gcc-4.2 on 10.5 intel by following the README.LLVM