search for: collyer

Hello, I've been having a few troubles with samba 3. I can only get 4MB/sec writing to the FreeBSD server that it is running on. As its on a 100Mbit network I was expecting at least 6-7MB/sec. I've included the smb.conf below is there anything obvious that I have missed from the config that can be seen as a performance gain or does anyone have any ideas for non samba items that can

Hello, I'm using R code that includes a residual permutation that was written as a supplement to the paper: Turner et al. 2010. A general hypothesis-testing framework for stable isotopes ratios in ecological studies. Ecology 91:2227-2233. The supplemental code is available at: http://www.esapubs.org/archive/ecol/E091/157/suppl-1.htm When I execute the function, no warnings are given

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 08:32:45AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: > Wasn't Solaris, which for awhile at least, was probably the most popular > Unix, using ksh by default? Solaris /bin/sh was a real real dumb version of the bourne shell. Solaris included /bin/ksh as part of the core distribution (ksh88 was a part of the SVr4 specification) and so many scripts were written with #!/bin/ksh at

Can someone, more learned in the ways of dtrace point me at what to look at to help understand why the kernel on one machine is using tons of memory, while another machine doing the same task/same user load is not. swapinfo for the "afflicted" machine shows RAM _______Total 16384 Mb RAM Unusable 73 Mb RAM Kernel 9226 Mb RAM Locked 2 Mb RAM Used

...amp; (EXCLUSIVE_OPLOCK|BATCH_OPLOCK)) #define BATCH_OPLOCK_TYPE(lck) ((lck) & BATCH_OPLOCK) #define LEVEL_II_OPLOCK_TYPE(lck) ((lck) & LEVEL_II_OPLOCK) ==== end patch ==== -- Don't reinvent the flat tire. (From the "Can't Happen" paper by Ian Darwin and Geoff Collyer)