search for: colloquialism

I have been working with a new translator for the project and particularly the wiki (whom I have known for perhaps 18 months), and he has put up a test translation for the centos 5.3 release notes at: http://www.msamir.net/centos-release-notes/ I have encouraged him to subscribe here, and to self-introduce. He remarks that there is not a clear editor for right to left authoring in our

I am changing provider. The new provider gives out five public dynamic IP-adresses. Is there anyway to get a Shorewall-box to snag more then one IP-address, and then proxy-arp? I''m guessing that the answer is "No", but hey, you never know. Is there any other way that I could actually use my additional IP''s for my internal systems, and still use Shorewall for

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 04:00:30PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:19:34PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> I think what confuses me is that keep talking about a single binary, but > >> clearly there is this separate vddk DSO, and there is talk of plugins. > >> So it seems to me that multiple files are

Hello, Has anyone already come up with a set of shared behaviours that someone could leverage when adhering to a CRUD concept, with respect to controllers? Relatedly, it would be nice if there were a way to share generalized behaviour specs. -Chris

The LLVM IR reference manual states, for fptosi: "The ‘fptosi’ instruction converts its floating-point <http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#t-floating> operand into the nearest (rounding towards zero) signed integer value." I interpreted this to mean that it rounds: The nearest integer to 0.3 is 0. The nearest integer to 0.9 is 1. The nearest integer to 0.5 is either 0 or 1. And

If fptosi takes 0.9 -> 0, then that is not 'rounding' in any sense I'm aware of (IEEE754 or otherwise). Rounding (in the IEE754 sense) determines how a number is converted when it is halfway between two candidate results. (see round(), ceil(), floor()). fptosi seems to model the behavior of a C cast from float to int, which truncates the fractional bits (as in trunc()). Steve

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 05:02:12PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 04:00:30PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * Richard W. M. Jones: > >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:19:34PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> >> I think what confuses me is that keep talking about a single binary,

I've made a large update to the introduction to compressed audio. I completely rewrote the first section, which I wasn't happy with. It now features two diagrams (worth 1000 words each!), and is broken up into a couple of sections. http://cs.leander.isd.tenet.edu/~mitchell/vorbis_intro.html I have also continued to tweak other sections based on feedback from email and this forum.

I've made a large update to the introduction to compressed audio. I completely rewrote the first section, which I wasn't happy with. It now features two diagrams (worth 1000 words each!), and is broken up into a couple of sections. http://cs.leander.isd.tenet.edu/~mitchell/vorbis_intro.html I have also continued to tweak other sections based on feedback from email and this forum.

Hello R list, I have a little problem with splom. I'd like to wrap it in a function, for example: multi.scatterplot <- function(data,groups,cols,colors) { splom(~data[,cols], groups = as.symbol(groups), data = data, panel = panel.superpose, col=colors) } and then call it like in multi.scatterplot(iris,"Species",1:4,c("green","blue","red"))

* Richard W. M. Jones: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 04:00:30PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Richard W. M. Jones: >> >> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:19:34PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> >> I think what confuses me is that keep talking about a single binary, but >> >> clearly there is this separate vddk DSO, and there is talk of plugins.

Hi, Can we change this behaviour? Thanks & Regards, Anantha Raghava On 26/12/23 2:56 pm, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 26 Dec 2023 14:28:00 +0530 > Anantha Raghava via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We are running Samba-AD version 4.18.1 and are observing a peculiar >> behaviour. >> >> Our environment

If I have 3 groups,and for each group,I get the ratio(e.g. incidence rate). Now I wanna compare 3 ratio pairwise,and get the corresponding p values,i.e: group1 vs group2 ,p value=? group1 vs group3 ,p value=? group2 vs group3 ,p value=? Which statistical test should be used? Thanks a lot for your help. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I'm trying to get Runes of Magic working with WINE 1.1.25 (.26 is supposed to have problems but supposedly this works in 1.1.25) I have an ATI card with the FGLRX driver and I'm getting this error fixme:d3d9:Direct3DShaderValidatorCreate9 stub when loading the game. The game loads and has a black screen only, but I can hear sound. I've tried playing around with all the video

Dear Alex; Thanks for your kindly reply. Please explain for me what do u mean exactly in "a la" in the following sentence u wrote it below? " in SIP, this can be done via "re-INVITEs" a la the canreinvite= option for SIP peers in sip.conf" Another thing, do u mean that it is easier (better) if we need H.323 endpoint to talk with SIP endpoint then we use full

Dear Sir / Madam, I am using R Programming Language Version 2.15.1 (2012-06-22) for sometime in a 32 bit PC running Windows OS (Platform: i386-pc-mingw32/i386 (32-bit)). During the execution / interpretation of the R script, sometimes it is found that behavior of the program is not consistent with the program structure. For example, it has been seen that, even if a condition inside an IF

Compiz and Beryl merge: What's really going on? Recently Quinns post to the beryl-dev mailing list entitled 'Merge on' has led to a lot of discussion, some of which has been good and some of which has led to a lot of misinformation, to clear things up I'd like to give the story of the merge, and the justification for some of the more peculiar aspects. Basically lets try to avoid

>> We are ready to spend more than 10.000 euros to help Xen to support Windows >> 2000 >I asked a Microsoft sales guy about ports of Windows and got this quote >forwarded from the Microsoft Research guys in Cambridge >"The XenoXP work is not currently under active development. Whilst >there is no *technical* reason that it can''t be done (and it would Ok

Hi All, We’ve prepared a new function attribute `maynotprogress` and loop metadata `llvm.loop.mustprogress` in order to better formalize the way LLVM deals with infinite loops without observable side-effects. This is deeply related to the implicit forward progress requirements in the IR. Background: There has been a demonstrated need for clarity within the forward progress requirements in LLVM

...nd the bit about "for symbol resolution". I > think that what you mean is that you will encode the autolink section > using symbols instead of as a section, and the linker is expected to > extract this when it reads the symbol table? > > Whoops... might have used a bit of a colloquialism there; sorry. All I mean is that there will be a method on the IRSymtab that LLD can use to retrieve the same set of strings that would be written into the the .autolink section of the relocatable object files by the backend. > > The linker will process the .autolink strings in the followin...