search for: collissions

David Collier-Brown wrote: > I wonder if Daniel S. Riley hit the nail on the head... > > For high-rate TCP transfers, back to back packets with interface cards > > that are close to the minimum interpacket gap, you actually expect 50% > > collisions from the TCP acks colliding with data packets. This limits > > the transfer rate to about 700 - 800 KB/sec; with

> Sounds more like you just introduced a new self-created problem that would require yet another workaround.. ;-) Definitely wrong. Appending .dir to directories and .folder to folder files keeps files completely distinct and name collissions are not possible. > But what was not clear from your mail, is what exactly you identified as "the problems" with standard Maildir++ setup? Having regular files filenames beginning with a . is a no-go and flawed by design. Extremely error-prone No serious designer would ever do that...

...and other customers IP's start showing loss using the channelstats info. Driving me freakin' crazy. It does appear there are network issues causing my troubles but I can't get help if I can't point to some hard and fast issues outside of Asterisk. The only thing I have right now is collissions showing on one of a few of our pfSense devices but they are virtual running on XenServer, still this would indicate a problem in my opinion. Thanks in advance for any assistance on this issue. Stepping back from the ledge now LOL -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachm...

...the other way around, though (Win2k --> Samba), it's just as fast as FTP (because I *do* have my stuff properly tuned!), so fast in fact that it makes my hub's excessive bandwidth alert LED go on ;) All my network cards are propery configured, both media- and duplex- wise. There are no collissions. I don't even know why I'm saying this, because the rates I can achieve with FTP both ways alone proves that Samba is the culprit. Because most of the time a transfer takes to complete is wasted on those random pauses, anything I could tune concerning buffer sizes and the like is almost us...

...are in between? These Theora pages have to be read first (otherwise they get lost) but the audio decoder should not need to wait for this. And worse case: The theora packet preparing/decoding is still working on a frame, so no more page_in calls for the theora streams are possible (or you get thos collissions). I think, an ideal solution are two "pointers" in seperate threads reading independently the physical source stream and grab their pages (and prepare/decode them) but ignore the other ones and don't need to wait. So I need two ogg_sync_states or something like that? It must work i...

...nd other customers IP's start showing loss using the channelstats info. Driving me freakin' crazy. It does appear there are network issues causing my troubles but I can't get help if I can't point to some hard and fast issues outside of Asterisk. The only thing I have right now is collissions showing on one of a few of our pfSense devices but they are virtual running on XenServer, still this would indicate a problem in my opinion. Thanks in advance for any assistance on this issue. Stepping back from the ledge now LOL -- ______________________________________________________________...

Hi, I'm trying to build a bridge using a 486DX2/66 with two 10 Mbit Ethernet NICs. The machine (tsushima) is running Debian stable and kernel 2.4.26. Previously I used it as a router, so I know the hardware (NICs) is working. The NICs are as follows: eth0: WD80x3 at 0x280, 00 00 C0 0A 2C 2F WD8003-old, IRQ 10, shared memory at 0xd0000-0xd1fff. eth16i.c: v0.35 01-Jul-1999 Mika Kuoppala

...l >network setup or topology. These machines are on the >same desk with no routers in the middle, and my hub >might be old and suck but, as I had said, I can >achieve equal incoming/outgoing transfer rates with >other protocols such as FTP. By the way, by "there >are no collissions" I meant "no more collissions than >normal", just to remark that it wasn't a duplex or >network problem. OK. >This is what I did: I installed Windows XP in a >virtual machine (VMware) running inside the Windows >2000 box that was receiving from Samba at 100 KB...

...customers IP's start showing loss using the channelstats info. > Driving me freakin' crazy. It does appear there are network issues causing my troubles but I can't get help if I can't point to some hard and fast issues outside of Asterisk. > The only thing I have right now is collissions showing on one of a few of our pfSense devices but they are virtual running on XenServer, still this would indicate a problem in my opinion. > Thanks in advance for any assistance on this issue. Stepping back from the ledge now LOL > > > -------------- next par...

...sing the channelstats info. > > > > Driving me freakin' crazy. It does appear there are network issues causing > my troubles but I can't get help if I can't point to some hard and fast > issues outside of Asterisk. > > > > The only thing I have right now is collissions showing on one of a few of > our pfSense devices but they are virtual running on XenServer, still this > would indicate a problem in my opinion. > > > > Thanks in advance for any assistance on this issue. Stepping back from the > ledge now LOL > > > > > > >...

Just updated two fc3 systems running svn trunk. One updated, installed properly, and is working fine. The second box failed during the 'make install' process with: /usr/lib/libnetsnmp.a(parse.o)(.text+0x275a): In function `unload_module': : multiple definition of `unload_module' res_snmp.o(.text+0x310):/usr/src/asterisk/res/res_snmp.c:102: first defined here /usr/bin/ld:

...and other customers IP's start showing loss using the channelstats info. Driving me freakin' crazy. It does appear there are network issues causing my troubles but I can't get help if I can't point to some hard and fast issues outside of Asterisk. The only thing I have right now is collissions showing on one of a few of our pfSense devices but they are virtual running on XenServer, still this would indicate a problem in my opinion. Thanks in advance for any assistance on this issue. Stepping back from the ledge now LOL -- __________________________________________________...

...and other customers IP's start showing loss using the channelstats info. Driving me freakin' crazy. It does appear there are network issues causing my troubles but I can't get help if I can't point to some hard and fast issues outside of Asterisk. The only thing I have right now is collissions showing on one of a few of our pfSense devices but they are virtual running on XenServer, still this would indicate a problem in my opinion. Thanks in advance for any assistance on this issue. Stepping back from the ledge now LOL -- ________________________________________________________________...

Hi, I am trying to deal with the problem, that under regular mbox format a path can lead to either a file or a directory, but not both, while under IMAP, a path is usually both, a message folder containing subfolders. I found dovecot's approach to this problem, the Maildir++ layout described under http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MboxChildFolders , and was astonished to see, what problems come with

Is there such a filesystem available? It seems like it wouldn't be too hard to implement... Basically do things on a block by block basis. Store md5 of a block in the table, and when writing a new block, check if the md5 already exists and then point the new block to the old block. Since md5 is not guaranteed unique, might need to do a diff between the 2 blocks and if the blocks are indeed

...;> >> >> Driving me freakin' crazy. It does appear there are network issues >> causing my troubles but I can't get help if I can't point to some hard and >> fast issues outside of Asterisk. >> >> >> >> The only thing I have right now is collissions showing on one of a few of >> our pfSense devices but they are virtual running on XenServer, still this >> would indicate a problem in my opinion. >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance for any assistance on this issue. Stepping back from >> the ledge now LOL >&g...

Hi all, are there any non-commercial solutions (apart from solutions like Dell EMC, IBM and NetApp) around that allow to simultaneously access the same file system via NFSv4 and Samba exports in a (nearly) non-conflicting manner, especially w.r.t. to NFSv4/Windows ACL incompatibilities? Best Sebatian ____________________ Sebastian Kraus Team IT am Institut f?r Chemie Geb?ude C, Stra?e des 17.

This week, I've been really busy with the launch of a new Swedish Voip provider, www.bbtele.se, so I haven't been able to follow the Asterisk community and haven't been very responsive either. My apologies if you've tried to contact me and I did not reply quickly or at all. So to cover up (can't report on what is happening :-) I dedicate this issue of Asterisk Sunday News to

Here are patches to do offline deduplication for Btrfs. It works well for the cases it''s expected to, I''m looking for feedback on the ioctl interface and such, I''m well aware there are missing features for the userspace app (like being able to set a different blocksize). If this interface is acceptable I will flesh out the userspace app a little more, but I believe the

Friends, I have updated my Asterisk 1.2 presentation with the latest information. It is still available in the same place as before: http://www.astricon.net/asterisk1-2/ Please continue to test the beta of Asterisk 1.2, available at ftp.digium.com. We need all the feedback we can get. If you are a developer and have some time for community work, please check in with the bug tracker and help us