search for: colchete

On 11.05.2016 22:45, Daniel van Ham Colchete wrote: > I can confirm that this bug also happens on the latest version available: > > root at dovecot:/# dovecot --version > 2.2.devel (ebf2e93) > root at dovecot:/# dpkg -l|grep dovecot > ii dovecot-core 2:2.2.24-1~auto+23 amd64 > secure POP3/IMAP serve...

...vecot version: 2.2.23 (806d709) / 2.2.23-1~bpo8+1 doveconf -n: http://pastebin.com/2xA2xuRw Filesystem: CephFS - Jewel After migrating our users from our old server to our new one we can't access a few mailboxes. Backtrace follows: root at dovecot:/# gdb --args /usr/lib/dovecot/imap -u daniel.colchete at mav.com.br GNU gdb (Debian 7.7.1+dfsg-5) 7.7.1 Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted b...

...torage areas I know my version is outdated but I didn't find anything related to this there. Just one last question: how can I remove that flag from the message? I have taken a look at doveadm-flags(1) but it doesn't seem to allow anything on that flag. Thank you very much! Best, Daniel Colchete

On 15 May 2015, at 02:50, Daniel van Ham Colchete <daniel.colchete at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello everyone! > > I would like to report a bug here. We are using dovecot's sdbox with > alternate storage here. From time to time my SSD partition gets full and I > always find users with lots of e-mails stuck there, and alt...

Hi, we start to run out of diskspace soon as our users start to keep mails for longer time periods. That's fine, but space consuming. The maildirs are about 1 TB in total, and not long ago we enabled zlib which is very nice. Now I have some thoughts about the next steps: a) Migrating the whole system to a new server with more storage? b) Install a virtual server for the mailsystem and an

...e fazer a primeira parte da quest?o da seguinte maneira: Para fazer com que a fun??o order execute o mesmo objetivo que a fun??o sort, faz-se o seguinte: x[order(x)] *Se plotarmos este comando no R realmente o objetivo da primeira pate da quest?o ? cumprido, por?m n?o entendi o pq desses dois colchetes ? ** E como fazer com que a fun??o sort realize o objetivo da fun??o order mas sem utilizar o order ?? Agrade?o muito mesmo se puderem me ajudar na quest?o 1 e nas quest?es acima (*) e (**) -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/How-emulate-the-function-order-without...

Hi all, I've been researching ways to replicate mail across multiple mailstores and have a few questions. Synching 2 mailstores (M1 & M2) via dsync works fine. I want to add a 3rd and 4th (M3 & M4) server to also be synced. Multi-sync (>2 servers): 1) How do I tell M1 and/or M2 to also sync to M3 and/or M4? Selective sync: 2) How do I sync specific domains to specific

...o instead of presenting INBOX and INBOX.Sent it should show INBOX and Sent. I tried to do it with imapc but couldn't find any configuration that would allow it. I also looked at Perdition IMAP Proxy and NGINX but couldn't find it there also. Does anyone knows a way to do it? Best, Daniel Colchete [1] https://lists.inverse.ca/sogo/arc/users/2015-06/msg00301.html

hi, trying to get fast searches on roundcube. would like if it could work like gmail (using multiple keywords to perform search) if not wrong, i think this is called fuzzy search(i do have dovecot_fts running)? please advise if anyone has managed to get this? thanks kevin

...If you really use DHT-like algorithms, rebalancing your cluster will require mininum data movement and you add or remove nodes. It will require a small change on the SQL queries above so that the new node also recognizes the new user, but it is easy to do. Let me know what you think! Best, Daniel Colchete On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:25 PM, <b-dovecot.org at grmbl.net> wrote: > Hi all, > > > I've been researching ways to replicate mail across multiple mailstores > and have a few questions. > > Synching 2 mailstores (M1 & M2) via dsync works fine. > I want to add...

Daniel, On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 09:26:32AM -0300, Daniel van Ham Colchete wrote: > B, > I really like the idea of N-way replication. Pairs are ugly, they cost double! Even if you have 20 servers, when one goes down all that IO traffic goes to just one. > So, what I did here was a (kind of) DHT-based n-way replication, where the node for the second copy...