search for: coffobject

.... > Apparently, you're supposed to write. >        for (llvm::object::section_iterator iter = Obj.begin_sections (); iter != Obj.end_sections(); iter.increment(ec)) > Srsly? > [ And - how do I go from a section_iterator to a coff_section ? ] That part of the interface is private to COFFObject. COFFObject itself isn't really designed to be used with the generic interface, although I'm very open to a better design that allows this in a sane way. > While I'm puzzling over that, I look some more, and I see: >        error_code getSection(int32_t index, const coff_section...

So, I'm trying to use this file to look inside COFF files. Got the header. OK. Now I want to look at the sections. Look, there's a section iterator. I can use that! So, I write: for (llvm::object::section_iterator iter = Obj.begin_sections (); iter != Obj.end_sections(); ++iter ) and it doesn't compile. There's no ++ for section iterators. Apparently, you're supposed to

...also occurs with -mcmodel=large specified. The exact output of the second command, llvm-rtdyld, is as follows... Assertion failed: (Sec->Characteristics & COFF::IMAGE_SCN_CNT_UNINITIALIZED_DATA) == 0 && "BSS sections don't have contents!", file C:\llvm\llvm\lib\Object\COFFObjectFile.cpp, line 951 0x00007FF65EAA574C (0x0000000000000016 0x00007FFC73140648 0x0000007900000008 0x00000079E68EDC40), HandleAbort() + 0xC bytes(s), c:\llvm\llvm\lib\support\windows\signals.inc, line 296 0x00007FFC807B396F (0x00007FF600000016 0x0000000000000000 0x0000007900000004 0x0000000000000101),...

...supposed to write. > > for (llvm::object::section_iterator iter = Obj.begin_sections (); > iter != Obj.end_sections(); iter.increment(ec)) > > Srsly? > > [ And - how do I go from a section_iterator to a coff_section ? ] > > That part of the interface is private to COFFObject. COFFObject itself > isn't really designed to be used with the generic interface, although > I'm very open to a better design that allows this in a sane way. > > > While I'm puzzling over that, I look some more, and I see: > > error_code getSection(int32_t in...

...ified. >> >> The exact output of the second command, llvm-rtdyld, is as follows... >> >> Assertion failed: (Sec->Characteristics & COFF::IMAGE_SCN_CNT_UNINITIALIZED_DATA) == 0 && "BSS sections don't have contents!", file C:\llvm\llvm\lib\Object\COFFObjectFile.cpp, line 951 >> 0x00007FF65EAA574C (0x0000000000000016 0x00007FFC73140648 0x0000007900000008 0x00000079E68EDC40), HandleAbort() + 0xC bytes(s), c:\llvm\llvm\lib\support\windows\signals.inc, line 296 >> 0x00007FFC807B396F (0x00007FF600000016 0x0000000000000000 0x0000007900000004 0x0...

...output of the second command, llvm-rtdyld, is as follows... >> >> >> >> Assertion failed: (Sec->Characteristics & >> COFF::IMAGE_SCN_CNT_UNINITIALIZED_DATA) == 0 && "BSS sections don't have >> contents!", file C:\llvm\llvm\lib\Object\COFFObjectFile.cpp, line 951 >> >> 0x00007FF65EAA574C (0x0000000000000016 0x00007FFC73140648 >> 0x0000007900000008 0x00000079E68EDC40), HandleAbort() + 0xC bytes(s), >> c:\llvm\llvm\lib\support\windows\signals.inc, line 296 >> >> 0x00007FFC807B396F (0x00007FF600000016 0x000...

Thanks for the link! There’s some code there that looks extremely relevant to say the least. > On 1 Oct 2015, at 19:00, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com> wrote: > > Maybe looking at their code might help: > > https://github.com/dotnet/llilc/blob/dd12743f9cdb5418f1c39b2cd756da1e8396a922/lib/Jit/LLILCJit.cpp#L299 > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:45 AM, David

...>> The exact output of the second command, llvm-rtdyld, is as follows... >> >> >> >> Assertion failed: (Sec->Characteristics & COFF::IMAGE_SCN_CNT_UNINITIALIZED_DATA) == 0 && "BSS sections don't have contents!", file C:\llvm\llvm\lib\Object\COFFObjectFile.cpp, line 951 >> >> 0x00007FF65EAA574C (0x0000000000000016 0x00007FFC73140648 0x0000007900000008 0x00000079E68EDC40), HandleAbort() + 0xC bytes(s), c:\llvm\llvm\lib\support\windows\signals.inc, line 296 >> >> 0x00007FFC807B396F (0x00007FF600000016 0x0000000000000000 0x00...