search for: coffman

I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages? I see the updated source file here: http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/ But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here: http://vault.centos.org/6.4/updates/x86_64/Packages/ Where should I be looking for the updated package for 6.4? Thanks. -- -MichaelC

Hi Tom,  I´m very glad using Shorewall I proud to say that use it in my whole network (215 Real IP´s over ProxyArp) I can filter everyone have mac-control of then etc etc. Well I´m like a child playing with it :) But now, have a question there is any way to filter or use an Anti-virus in this network ? To drop packets with virus ?? To scan HTTP request ?? Or maybe use Dansguardian ? Did you

...17. Re: where can download CENTOS 5.X???? (John Doe) > 18. Re: maraidb for el6 (Johnny Hughes) > 19. Re: CentOS 5 + Quagga + SELinux (SilverTip257) > 20. Re: CentOS 5 + Quagga + SELinux (Les Mikesell) > 21. Re: maraidb for el6 (Farkas Levente) > 22. gnutls bug (Michael Coffman) > 23. Re: gnutls bug (Peter) > 24. Re: gnutls bug (Frank Cox) > 25. Re: gnutls bug (John R Pierce) > 26. Re: gnutls bug (Dennis Jacobfeuerborn) > 27. Re: CentOS 6.5 install (Les Mikesell) > 28. Re: CentOS 6.5 install (m.roth at 5-cent.us) > 29. Full screen...

Hi! I have setup a router with 3 NIC: inet->eth0->eth1-local_users ->eth2-DMZ_server I have also setup dhcp and DNS on the router. DHCP is server only for eth1 while on eth2 I have static IP address. So everything works except connecting local_users on eth1 to Samba shares on the server in DMZ by server name. Yes, I have it in my DNS records to point to it and with nslookup

Does anyone know what a good maximum number of machines I should place in the ProxyArp list? Thanks Jamie

I can prove I've done this before, but I recently installed Rexcel (and it was easiest to reinstall R and some other bits to make it work) and now its no longer working. Before I would do an ANOVA and a tukey post-hoc like this: >data1.aov=aov(result~factor1*factor2, data=data1) then... >TukeyHSD(summary(data1.aov)) and it would give me a nice tukey table of all the pairwise

Hi All It''s about time to upgrade my shorewall routers again so thinking of possible changes. In our main office have managed switches and 5 xen servers. I''m thinking of running the firewall/router under xen. Don''t have all the details figured out but this is roughly what I''m thinking of: Set up separate vlan for the two isps and plug isps into the switch.

Begging indulgence of the list - asking here because due to the higher likelyhood of getting an answer... I have an application that often loses connection from one machine to another when one (or more) of the machines has particular brands of 1gig nics, but which runs rock solid when on 10meg nics and some 1 gig nics. The application senses (falsely) that the connection has been shut down

I want to build a robust firewall for a resort installation. The resort''s telephony is entirely VOIP, asterisk based. We have the following internet feeds: 1) 512/512 kb fixed bandwidth leased line with static IP from Telco- primary connection, expensive, to use for VOIP, VPN traffic, mail server, SSH access for remote work. Reliable. 2) 256/512 kb ADSL from Telco, not fixed IP -

Hello, In general I am in the habit of turning off memory overcommit because I believe it's a bad thing in a multi-user environment. This was never a problem on rhel5 systems, but on rhel6, I am having issues. When I try to set overcommit_memory=2, my system locks up. It basically behaves as if the memory is all used up... I see the same behavior on centos6 or rhel6. Following is

Hi, I have an interesting problem I was not able to solve, even after looking through the site''s documentation and searching on this mailing list...so here it is: I have an FTP server behind my Shorewall box, in my LAN (I know, bad security practice), and ports are mapped through DNAT rules. Now, whenever I transfer big files, at high, sustained data rates (~40-50KB/s), Shorewall seems

Hello, I''m not subscribed to this list, but would like to ask a question. When I conduct a network speed test from the following location http://www.timewarnerla.com/speedtest/speedtest.asp with firewall started I get no more than 1 Mbps at best, while without one I get 4 Mbps. I have a RCA DCM325 cable modem from RoadRunner. I''m using Shorewall 2.2.0-Beta3. My OS is SuSe 9.1

Hello, I am not able to use ftp and ssh on the lan. Both the port are open. I have the lines on the rules file : # Accept SSH connections from the local network for administration # ACCEPT loc fw tcp 22 # # Accept ftp connections from the local network for administration # ACCEPT loc fw tcp 21 Thanks in advance Varun

On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 11:03 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote: > On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 10:45 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 13:43 -0500, M Lu wrote: > > > Tom, can he specify openvpn twice in the tunnel file, e.g. > > > > > > openvpn:udp:5000 > > > openvpn:udp:5001 > > > > > > I think I had the problems with that so I use

Hello, I have 2 ISP uplinks (zones: inet1 and inet2), each with a fixed IP on the outside and a routed subnet (/25 and /26) on the inside. So, behind the firewall i have 2 networksegments (lan1 and lan2) with public IP-addresses. The segments are completely isolated from eachother: hosts in zone "lan1" connect only to "inet1" and hosts in zone "lan2" only connect

It took me a while to track this down. I am using MIT Kerberos 1.4.3 and libgssapi-0.7. With some patches that came with Suse 10, but that doesn't appear to be relevant. I have been using openssh-4.2p1 (with Simon's patches) and openssh-4p3p2 out of the box. I see the same problem no matter which version of openssh I am using. I am using two Suse Linux x86 boxes as a test

I am in the process of building a new machine to replace several older servers. I am considering running several virtual servers on one box, all linux for host and virtual machines using VirtualBox. Is it possible/advisable to configure shorewall on the host to act as a firewall for the virtual machines, each having one or more static public IP address? Any pointers, suggestions and/or

Hi all, I''ve a little server, an old PIII 677 with Fedora Core 4, default kernel, and Shorewall 3.0.1. This pc is working fine, but I need to use a 2nd ISP connection; everything is working from configuration point of view, but the server, after a while (usually few hours), just hangs. Removing the 2-ISP configuration part, the problem is solved, so I''m quite sure that hangs are

This article describes how to implement "Port Knocking" in Shorewall. http://shorewall.net/PortKnocking.html -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key

Hi folks, Has anyone out there done port forwarding or DNAT for UDP packets that are normally sent to the broadcast address (255.255.255.255)? I have to support a nasty database application called FileMaker Pro (those of you who know it are probably groaning about now), which uses broadcasts to locate the database server. Theoretically, i can get around this requirement by using LDAP lookups