Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "coercabl".
Did you mean:
coercable
2011 Oct 18
1
Function to "lump" factors together?
...f
"branch" -- using "UNK" as a default if nothing else matched.
Mind, the patterns there are "Shell Patterns" ("globs"), not regular
expressions.
I've looked at R functions match(), pmatch(), charmatch(), and switch();
while each looks as it it might be coercable to get the result I want,
it also looks to require iteration over the thousands of entries I have
-- as well as using the functions in question in a fairly "unnatural"
way.
I could also write my own function that iterates over the entries,
generating factors from the branch names -- but...
1999 Jan 20
0
dist(*, "euclidean") [was "dist function suggestion"]
...Y=myY)
> would work
> one could even make it such that
> both
> dist(X, myY)
> and dist(X, "euclidean")
> would work. However, the extra hack for dist(X, Y)
Um, I did think about that, but precisely what would be rules be?
For now the second argument can be anything coercable to a character
(why is match.arg not used?), or should be since ?pmatch says
x: the values to be matched.
without mentioning mode, although the internal code has isString
(whatever precisely that is). In particular, names fail in R but not
S, although as documented they should work in R...