Displaying 20 results from an estimated 60 matches for "codoc".
Did you mean:
codec
2009 Nov 17
1
Codoc mismatches
I have a function:
source_dir <- function(path, pattern = "\\.[rR]$", chdir = TRUE) ...
documented with
...
\usage{source_dir(path, pattern="\\.[rR]$", chdir=TRUE)}
...
But I get
Codoc mismatches from documentation object 'source_dir':
source_dir
Code: function(path, pattern = "\\.[rR]$", chdir = TRUE)
Docs: function(path, pattern = "\.[rR]$", chdir = TRUE)
Mismatches in argument default values:
Name: 'pattern' Code: "\\.[rR]$&qu...
2010 Feb 02
1
codoc mismatches warning
Hi,
Doing 'R CMD check diveMove' is now throwing this message:
Data codoc mismatches from documentation object 'sealLocs':
Variables in data frame 'sealLocs'
Code: id.time.class.lon.lat
Docs: class id lat lon time
with:
R> sessionInfo()
R version 2.10.1 (2009-12-14)
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
locale:
[1] LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C...
2012 Dec 14
1
Strange, most probably unjustified, codoc mismatch for S4 method with one argument plus '...' (re-try)
...y is present
in the code but missing in the documentation , although it is actually
NOT in the code. In order to make this reproducible for everybody, I put
together a little dummy package in which one of the methods leads to
exactly this warning:
http://www.bioinf.jku.at/people/bodenhofer/codocMismatchTest_0.0.1.tar.gz
Just run 'R CMD check' on this archive and you'll see. You will also see
from the code and the corresponding documentation that the warning seems
unjustified. I tried the following R versions: 2.12.1, 2.13.0, 2.13.1,
2.14.0, 2.14.1, 2.15.0, 2.15.1, 2.15.2, 2...
2012 Dec 11
0
Strange, most probably unjustified, codoc mismatch for S4 method with one argument plus '...'
...y is present
in the code but missing in the documentation , although it is actually
NOT in the code. In order to make this reproducible for everybody, I put
together a little dummy package in which one of the methods leads to
exactly this warning:
http://www.bioinf.jku.at/people/bodenhofer/codocMismatchTest_0.0.1.tar.gz
Just run 'R CMD check' on this archive and you'll see. You will also see
from the code and the corresponding documentation that the warning seems
unjustified. I tried the following R versions: 2.12.1, 2.13.0, 2.13.1,
2.14.0, 2.14.1, 2.15.0, 2.15.1, 2.15.2, 2...
2001 Jul 27
2
Seemingly bizarre behavior in R CMD check
...an odd and repeatedly irritating
error I noticed when running the check Perl script on my R 1.3 project. In
following it line by line, I traced my problem down to the
code/documentation matching within check, the most recent version of which
seems to verify proper .Rd formatting by means of R's codoc and undoc
functions. Under R --vanilla, those two then unpack and repack my project,
with each assembling a kind of test tempfile to ensure various structural
requirements within my project. At first, I got bogged down in a mysterious
"parse" problem, R's not-too-revealing result of a...
2001 Sep 06
4
code/documentation mismatches
Hi,
I would like to get a hint on how to debug in the case of
#> R CMD check pllib
signalling
* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... WARNING
Error in parse(file, n, text, prompt) : syntax error on line 22
I am able to sort out which of the files is the culprit is by swapping
files in and out of the /R and /man directories. But I cannot find the
syntax error, the .Rd file seems
2003 Apr 22
2
Handling of upper/lowercase in package names (PR#2816)
...#39;:
The following object(s) are masked from package:tools :
.checkDemoIndex .checkVignetteIndex .installMD5sums
.installPackageDescription .installPackageIndices buildVignettes
checkAssignFuns checkDocArgs checkDocStyle checkFF checkMD5sums checkMethods
checkTnF checkVignettes codoc md5sum pkgVignettes print.checkAssignFuns
print.checkDemoIndex print.checkDocArgs print.checkDocStyle print.checkFF
print.checkMethods print.checkTnF print.checkVignetteIndex
print.checkVignettes print.codoc print.undoc Rdindex Rtangle RtangleSetup
RtangleWritedoc RweaveLatex RweaveLatexOptions Rwe...
2005 Oct 10
1
'R CMD check' gets apparently confused by '%' (PR#8198)
...ent
Version: R-2.0.0-beta-from-a-week-ago
OS: linux
Submission from: (NULL) (202.156.6.77)
When running 'R CMD check' for a package that contains the symbol '%'
in the signature of a function (say the default parameter for a string argument
is like "10% - 20%"), the 'codoc' part of the check throws a warning
about mismatching doc and codoc.
While the '%' has apparently to be escaped in the .Rnw (otherwise latex soon
figures out that what is after on the same line is a comment), the warning
remains
whether or not '%' is escaped in the code.
The p...
2005 Aug 16
1
Fwd: Documenting data sets with many variables
...s time:
I have a data set in my R package "micEcon", which has many variables (82).
Therefore, I would like to avoid to describe all variables in the "\format"
section of the documentation (.Rd file). However, doing this lets "R CMD
check" complain about "data codoc mismatches" (details see below).
Is there a way to avoid the description of all variables without getting a
complaint from "R CMD check"?
Thanks,
Arne
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Documenting data sets with many variables
Date: Friday 05 August 2005 14:03
Fr...
2007 May 30
2
S4 assignment \alias and \usage
What is the Rd file alias and usage syntax for an S4 assignment method?
I have been trying variations on
\alias{TSdoc<-,default-method}
\usage{
\S4method{TSdoc}{default}(x) <- value
but so far I have not got it right according to various codoc, etc, checks.
Paul Gilbert
====================================================================================
La version fran?aise suit le texte anglais.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email may contain privileged and/or confidential...
2009 Aug 20
1
Problem with updating/reinstalling R under UBUNTU (Hardy)
...;
make[5]: Leaving directory `/data/prog/R-2.9.1/src/library/tools/src'
make[4]: Leaving directory `/data/prog/R-2.9.1/src/library/tools'
Error in namespaceExport(ns, exports) :
exportations non définies : checkDocFiles, checkDocStyle, checkFF, checkReplaceFuns, checkS3methods, checkTnF, codoc, codocClasses, codocData, undoc
Calls: ::: ... tryCatch -> tryCatchList -> tryCatchOne -> <Anonymous>
In addition: Warning message:
les méthodes S3 ‘print.checkDocFiles’, ‘print.checkDocStyle’, ‘print.checkFF’, ‘print.checkReplaceFuns’, ‘print.checkS3methods’, ‘print.checkTnF’, ‘prin...
2009 Jun 09
3
"R CMD check" does not find a mistake
Hi the list,
I build a package. They was a mistake in it, but R CMD check did not
find it. Is that normal ?
Here is what Kurt gets (which is right, I did this mistake):
--- 8< ----------------
* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... WARNING
S4 class codoc mismatches from documentation object 'LongData-class':
Slots for class 'LongData'
Code: id other time traj varName
Docs: id time traj varName
--- 8< ----------------
But here is what I get :
--- 8< ----------------
R CMD check longitudinalData
* checking for working pdfl...
2017 Mar 01
1
stats::median
....4.0)
and a "new" one with R (>= 3.4.0).
Probably easiest would be to comment the \usage{.} / \arguments \item{...}
parts for the time being {as long as you don't want R (>= 3.4.0)
in your package DESCRIPTION "unconditionally"}.
--
Tweaking R-devel's tools::codoc() for this special case may
be a solution liked more by package maintainers for this case.
OTOH, we can only change R-devel's version of codoc(), so it
would be that platform which would show slightly inaccurate
"Usage:" for these (by not showing "...") which also seems a...
2001 Mar 02
1
VR_6.2-4 is released
An update of the VR bundle was released on Monday and should have
propagated around CRAN now. It is a collection of bug fixes (many to
documentation, thanks to Kurt Hornik's great tools undoc and codoc) and
small enhancements for R.
It does need R 1.2.2 to install (the help files make use of new markup
for methods) but only 1.2.0 to run. Thus the precompiled Windows
version will run on rw1021.
--
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http...
2001 Mar 02
1
VR_6.2-4 is released
An update of the VR bundle was released on Monday and should have
propagated around CRAN now. It is a collection of bug fixes (many to
documentation, thanks to Kurt Hornik's great tools undoc and codoc) and
small enhancements for R.
It does need R 1.2.2 to install (the help files make use of new markup
for methods) but only 1.2.0 to run. Thus the precompiled Windows
version will run on rw1021.
--
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http...
2005 Mar 03
1
Underscore character in Rd files
...iable name is
included as-is and when I run R CMD CHECK I get a latex error because
latex considers '_' a special character (used for subscripts) which is
only allowed in math mode.
When I replace the variable name with 'Health\_Env' in the Rd file latex
runs fine, but I get a codoc-mismatch warning because the backslash is not
part of the variable name in the data frame.
Is there a way to completely satisfy R CMD CHECK in this case and avoid
both errors and warnings??
I'm using
> version
_
platform i386-pc-mingw32
arch i386
os mingw32
system...
2012 Feb 17
1
Parallel R CMD check?
Running R CMD check on a package can take quite a lot of time. Checks
seem like they could be run in parallel (separate processes for, e.g.,
codoc, examples, tests, ...). Is there a way to do this? My current
usage is typically
R CMD build <pkg>
R CMD check pkg_x.y.z.tar.gz
Thanks for any hints,
Martin
--
Computational Biology
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N. PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109
Locat...
2002 Oct 01
1
R CMD check dependency simplification
...at is, since
everything is copied into the pkg.Rcheck directory, it is difficult to
make any changes to source files without having to completely re-do "R
CMD check pkg".
For example, I would like to be able to make changes to
src/pkg1/man/foo.Rd and have dependencies that indicate only codoc and
examples need to be re-run, not tests and vignettes. (R CMD check can to
do this, the problem is moving the appropriate new pieces, in the
appropriate way, into the pkg1.Rcheck directory.)
The difficulty is exacerbated for me because I have pkg3 depends on pkg2
depends on pkg1. If I make a cha...
2013 Jan 04
1
Bug in R CMD check for \ in Rd?
...s source/Rd are below:
https://github.com/yihui/knitr/blob/master/R/template.R#L43-L44
https://github.com/yihui/knitr/blob/master/man/knit_expand.Rd
When I run R CMD check on the package I get this warning (with both R
2.15.2 and R-devel):
* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... WARNING
Codoc mismatches from documentation object 'knit_expand':
knit_expand
Code: function(file, ..., text = readLines(file, warn = FALSE), delim
= "\\{\\{((.|\n)+?)\\}\\}")
Docs: function(file, ..., text = readLines(file, warn = FALSE), delim
= "\{\...
2004 Nov 09
1
Package Documentation, cryptic
Hi, sorry for this lengthy post.
I am using R-2.0.0 on Unix, compiled.
Overview:
A) R CMD check: Unaccounted top-level text
B) In which sections of *.Rd is LaTeX notation allowed, where *not*?
C) Codoc mismatches and polyvalent parameters
D) Successful R CMD INSTALL and R CMD build
E) cp ../Rd.sty . is copy necessary?
F) latex ./CWHstat-manual.tex runs into trouble
When running >R CMD check CWHstat I get
=====
...
* checking foreign function calls ... OK
* checki...