Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "codewriter".
2010 Mar 27
2
[LLVMdev] Static code generation - is it gone from LLVM 2.7?
...tever.bc
doesn't work in Linux environment anymore (well it wasn't fully
implemented before but it worked for simple bytecodes in 2.6).
I used to generate code by creating TargetMachine and
FunctionPassManager, then calling TargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile,
then adding my own CodeEmitter/CodeWriter (exactly like llc does). I
have to say I always hated code emitter interface but at least it worked
for me.
Now LLVMTargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile has changed. It adds its own
code emitter and it's always MachOCodeEmitter which of course I don't need.
Is there a new way to create non-...
2010 Mar 27
0
[LLVMdev] Static code generation - is it gone from LLVM 2.7?
...in Linux environment anymore (well it wasn't fully
> implemented before but it worked for simple bytecodes in 2.6).
>
> I used to generate code by creating TargetMachine and
> FunctionPassManager, then calling TargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile,
> then adding my own CodeEmitter/CodeWriter (exactly like llc does). I
> have to say I always hated code emitter interface but at least it worked
> for me.
>
> Now LLVMTargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile has changed. It adds its own
> code emitter and it's always MachOCodeEmitter which of course I don't need.
>
>...
1997 Sep 05
0
R-alpha: GLM (from R-core)
As some of you may know, there has been formed a "core team" of
developers, who can dig directly into the R source at Auckland and fix
bugs etc., in order to speed up development. There is a mailing list
for that group. This is necessary, because some of the bugs discussed
are not publicly available (and hopefully will never be!), but one
potential risk of the structure is that we forget
2010 Mar 27
2
[LLVMdev] Static code generation - is it gone from LLVM 2.7?
...nt anymore (well it wasn't fully
>> implemented before but it worked for simple bytecodes in 2.6).
>>
>> I used to generate code by creating TargetMachine and
>> FunctionPassManager, then calling TargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile,
>> then adding my own CodeEmitter/CodeWriter (exactly like llc does). I
>> have to say I always hated code emitter interface but at least it worked
>> for me.
>>
>> Now LLVMTargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile has changed. It adds its own
>> code emitter and it's always MachOCodeEmitter which of course I don...