Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "codewrit".
Did you mean:
codewiz
2010 Mar 27
2
[LLVMdev] Static code generation - is it gone from LLVM 2.7?
...tever.bc
doesn't work in Linux environment anymore (well it wasn't fully
implemented before but it worked for simple bytecodes in 2.6).
I used to generate code by creating TargetMachine and
FunctionPassManager, then calling TargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile,
then adding my own CodeEmitter/CodeWriter (exactly like llc does). I
have to say I always hated code emitter interface but at least it worked
for me.
Now LLVMTargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile has changed. It adds its own
code emitter and it's always MachOCodeEmitter which of course I don't need.
Is there a new way to create no...
2010 Mar 27
0
[LLVMdev] Static code generation - is it gone from LLVM 2.7?
...in Linux environment anymore (well it wasn't fully
> implemented before but it worked for simple bytecodes in 2.6).
>
> I used to generate code by creating TargetMachine and
> FunctionPassManager, then calling TargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile,
> then adding my own CodeEmitter/CodeWriter (exactly like llc does). I
> have to say I always hated code emitter interface but at least it worked
> for me.
>
> Now LLVMTargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile has changed. It adds its own
> code emitter and it's always MachOCodeEmitter which of course I don't need.
>
&...
1997 Sep 05
0
R-alpha: GLM (from R-core)
...ther cases the user should be free to use
other values of the df that might improve the approximation. This is
particularly true when the user specifies the dispersion, as then we have
no idea what df is appropriate."
That kind of topic is about "policy" as opposed to bugfixing and
codewriting, and - as Martin Maechler pointed out - there are people
on R-devel who have broad experience in GLMs and may want to
contribute to the discussion.
Also other things with GLMs are debatable, e.g. whether it is always
correct to use the weighted RSS and not the deviance for the
dispersion estim...
2010 Mar 27
2
[LLVMdev] Static code generation - is it gone from LLVM 2.7?
...nt anymore (well it wasn't fully
>> implemented before but it worked for simple bytecodes in 2.6).
>>
>> I used to generate code by creating TargetMachine and
>> FunctionPassManager, then calling TargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile,
>> then adding my own CodeEmitter/CodeWriter (exactly like llc does). I
>> have to say I always hated code emitter interface but at least it worked
>> for me.
>>
>> Now LLVMTargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile has changed. It adds its own
>> code emitter and it's always MachOCodeEmitter which of course I don&...