search for: codeofconduct

Hi all, So i wanted to kick off this mailing list by trying to round up a few things which have been discussed recently, at GUADEC, in f2f conversations afterwards, or shot over emails between a few people. It's been discussed for a while that we want to create a tiny base runtime with bst. The upshot is this will homogenize the metadata used in the build process for Flatpak, GNOME

Hi Stefan, You can find the contribution guidelines here : https://llvm.org/docs/Contributing.html LLVM also have code of conduct : https://llvm.org/docs/CodeOfConduct.html On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 at 23:28, David Blaikie via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 10:54 AM Stefan Kanthak <stefan.kanthak at nexgo.de> > wrote: > >> "David Blaikie" <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >...

Hi: Since you mentioned this, I was wondering if Chris or someone else could take over the existing /r/LLVM and make it an official forum or something. In that case we had Reddit’s anti-spam measures in place and probably a better forum-like experience. Mailing list could be really disturbing occasionally Zhang > On 26 Mar 2018, at 18:22, Praveen Velliengiri via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at

Hi! I think that comments section will help people to organize the Q&A in the same webpage. But it also leads to spam as you said, However, I don't have any strong rationale for enabling them :) Thanks for your reply Chris! Pree On 26 March 2018 at 22:45, Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org> wrote: > On Mar 26, 2018, at 10:12 AM, Praveen Velliengiri via llvm-dev < >

<div>Here we've began discussion about "master"</div><div><a href="https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-June/142448.html">https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-June/142448.html</a></div><div> </div><div>Lets remove Job word completely</div><div><pre>But as one can easily fact-check,

Chandler, I am not a “politically correct” person, never have been, never will be. If you are waiting for me to make a politically incorrect statement so you can jump on it, let me assure you that you will never be disappointed. But if that’s all you do then you and llvm lose out. If you want to actually help llvm move forward then you should judge what I say based on its merit,

"David Blaikie" <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Context is everything. I'm willing to accept your humble apologies. > Spotting the relevant details in long build output > can be tricky & some emphasis (caps, the *** borders, etc) can be useful. So you dare to "shout" at your users/customers, but mock when someone (me) uses the same sort of emphasis,