search for: codeline

Hello, Is there an way to easy comment of sections of code? I was thinking something along the lines of \dontrun{ codeline 1 .... codeline k } but that could be used in regular script files. When I am still working on a script, I often want to being using what is done, but I would like the parts I am still working on not to be run when I use source() on the file. I can set everything off with #, but that gets to be...

Hi I a newbie in RoR! So I have an easy question for some of you: I want with the following codeline link to the Admin-Controller. The codeline is on the Product-View with a seperate controller "Product". <%= link_to ''Back'', :action => ''Admin'' %> But it doesn''t work correctly. Can anyone help me? I want to make a simple link! Thx....

Hi R-hackers I try to write a batch (in Windows, i have to use!) with Rcmd BATCH D:\Test.R D:\Test.Rout and Rterm.exe --no-restore --no-save < D:\Test.R > D:\Test.Rout. In my file Test.R are any tk-codelines (like: Window1 <- tktoplevel(); ... tkbutton...). It works not interactifly, what is written in Rcmd BATCH --help. Exist there a way to do it all the same? Please help... Otherwise i have to use Excel to get the GUIs . (and sorry about my english, it's terrible) Thomas...

...ot;id", "firstname" and "lastname". Now, I want to manipulate parameter "lastname", because I would like to add at the end a point. >> Thomas Miller ----->>> save in the database ------>>> Thomas Miller. until now, I have the following codelines. But it doesn''t manipulate the lastname-parameter. Can anyone help to manipulate this parameter? Example: -------- def update @user = User.find(params[:id]) if @user.update_attributes(params[:user]) flash[:notice] = ''User was successfully updated.'' redirec...

>>> What uEFI specification version does your system claim to be compliant with?? I'd like to read over the spec for the call to verify things. -- -Gene <<< I've tried to find the relationship between UseDefaultAddress and DHP relays but I couldn't find anything. The use of DHCP relays should be really transparent... Best, Patrick

>>> As noted in the reply to Matt Fleming's initial EFI networking implementation, I think some systems go stupid on UseDefaultAddress and AllowPromiscuous as true.? I just tested and saw no negative results from killing the codelines setting AllowPromiscuous in efi/udp.c on my machines. -- -Gene <<< This is good; BTW what was the rationale at the time for taking AllowPromiscuous=1 ?? Best, Patrick

So, what''s the deal with all this REST and Resource stuff? Why should I care about it? How does it help me? Why is it cool? Everywhere I see the stuff mentioned, it assumes you already know what it is and why it''s good. Thanks, Joe

Hi ! Is there any way to have stream pushing from an icecast server to another ? Of course, it can be easily done with a third party app but could be useful if embedded in the server part... Thx, Guillaume (sorry for the first wrong thread)

Hey Timo, Just curious if you ever thought about supporting other than just OpenSSL? PolarSSL looks really interesting, has no major dependencies and is very lightweight compared to OpenSSL, GNUTLS or others... https://polarssl.org/ I guess it could be a lot of work, or not, anyway, I'm just curious... -- Best regards, */Charles/*

...lt: ----- ---- ------- miller m unique miller f unique jackson m unique miller m isn''t unique So I want to check the name and sex be together unique. The name isn''t individually. Because when I use the following codelines, the third entry in the example isn''t unique, but I would! validates_uniqueness_of :name validates_uniqueness_of :sex thx for your help! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...9;t find anything. The use of DHCP relays should be really transparent... As noted in the reply to Matt Fleming's initial EFI networking implementation, I think some systems go stupid on UseDefaultAddress and AllowPromiscuous as true. I just tested and saw no negative results from killing the codelines setting AllowPromiscuous in efi/udp.c on my machines. -- -Gene

...taus at yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> > > As noted in the reply to Matt Fleming's initial EFI networking > implementation, I think some systems go stupid on UseDefaultAddress > and AllowPromiscuous as true. I just tested and saw no negative > results from killing the codelines setting AllowPromiscuous in > efi/udp.c on my machines. > > -- > -Gene > <<< > > This is good; BTW what was the rationale at the time for > taking AllowPromiscuous=1 ?? That's the point of the aforementioned reply. It seems unnecessary, confusing and actu...

Hi Guillaume, Last time I've tried, Icecast can only "pull" a stream from other Icecasts. And Karl's branch (I'm not sure about the trunk codeline as of today) can pull on demand, so only if you have connected listeners the stream is pulled from the source server, thus saving bandwidth (but who needs to save badwidth nowadays, huh? ;-). The functionality is called relaying, and it's configured using <relay> tags in the config X...

I run large piece of code in JIT and it runs only marginallty faster with optimization levels 1,2,3. I think differences are within the margin or error. level user time 0 17339ms 1 16913ms 2 16891ms 3 16898ms Level is set with builder->setOptLevel(olev); Compilation time is excluded by taking the only top-level function address before the run

The original thread on this ICE, including a link to the bug submitted to MS is here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-December/056683.html Michael From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Sergiy Migdalskiy Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 10:28 To: David Blaikie Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Patch to compile LLVM

>From the DeveloperPolicy.html document I gathered I need to send a patch to this list (which I did); could you clarify if I misunderstood it? The second patch is really trivial and I think it's worth applying - it seems like a typo by someone who tested on MSVC 11 but not 10; or maybe my local instance of MSVC10 is somehow deficient, of course. The first patch is adding MSVC-specific

I''ve been working with Rails for 3 Months now, but haven''t experienced this problem until now. I''m currently working through Micharl Hartls Tutorial and everything worked fine so far, but suddenly (chapter 11) I can nolonger create Migration Files. when entering "rails g model Name field1:type" I don''t get the usual "create db/migrate...."