Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "codegeni".
Did you mean:
codegen
2013 Apr 25
6
[LLVMdev] Proposal for new Legalization framework
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> On Apr 24, 2013, at 5:01 PM, Dan Gohman <dan433584 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > In the spirit of the (long-term) intent to migrate away from the
> SelectionDAG framework, it is desirable to implement legalization passes as
> discrete passes. Attached is a patch which implements the beginning of
2013 Apr 25
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal for new Legalization framework
.....
>
>
> I don't wish to argue about this, and am fine following your suggestion.
> However, I would like to understand your reasons better.
>
What would be the plan as far as incrementally achieving this alternate
implementation?
Why has " avoiding having LLVM-IR-level optimization passes which lower
the IR, which has historically been a design goal of LLVM"?
2013 Apr 25
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal for new Legalization framework
On Apr 24, 2013, at 5:01 PM, Dan Gohman <dan433584 at gmail.com> wrote:
> In the spirit of the (long-term) intent to migrate away from the SelectionDAG framework, it is desirable to implement legalization passes as discrete passes. Attached is a patch which implements the beginning of a new type legalization pass, to help motivate discussion.
This is a great discussion to have.
> Is
2013 Apr 25
11
[LLVMdev] Proposal for new Legalization framework
In the spirit of the (long-term) intent to migrate away from the
SelectionDAG framework, it is desirable to implement legalization passes as
discrete passes. Attached is a patch which implements the beginning of a
new type legalization pass, to help motivate discussion.
Is LLVM IR the right level for this? The main alternative approach that's
been discussed is to do FastISel to a