search for: codegendebug

On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:01:40AM +0200, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > While trying to hunt down a codegen bug (not yet found) ... Have you considered using bugpoint for your codegen debugging needs? http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/Bugpoint.html#codegendebug > I've collected some small patches you might find useful. Sweet! > Please review and apply as you see fit. I've applied your gccld patch. For the isExecutable patch, you check to see if it's a file first before calling access(), but that precludes that function being used...

...gt; On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:01:40AM +0200, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: >> >>> While trying to hunt down a codegen bug (not yet found) ... >> >> Have you considered using bugpoint for your codegen debugging needs? >> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/Bugpoint.html#codegendebug > > Well, the (critical) bug in question was > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=548 , and I'm not sure if > bugpoint could have helped me reducing the testcase down from a huge program. > But then, I've never looked too closely - is there a small tutorial ? Mi...

...20, 2005 at 12:12:54PM +0200, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > Misha Brukman wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:01:40AM +0200, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer > >wrote: Have you considered using bugpoint for your codegen debugging > >needs? http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/Bugpoint.html#codegendebug > > Well, the (critical) bug in question was > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=548 , and I'm not sure if > bugpoint could have helped me reducing the testcase down from a huge > program. Actually, that is the `point' of bugpoint, pun intended. :) > But th...