search for: codegencxx

The test case that you added in this revision fails on several of the power buildbots (for example, http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64-elf-linux2/builds/20127) and also when I build it locally: FAIL: Clang :: CodeGenCXX/main-norecurse.cpp (2951 of 27722) ******************** TEST 'Clang :: CodeGenCXX/main-norecurse.cpp' FAILED ******************** Script: -- /home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/./bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /home/seurer/llvm/build/llvm-test/bin/../lib/clang/3.8.0/include -nostdsystemi...

...chandlerc doubts the test itself is fulfill the C++ standard. Although "-fshort-wchar" makes the error disappered, chandlerc think it's not the correct solution. Perhaps it's test bug not clang's. Clang :: CXX/special/class.copy/p15-inclass.cpp Clang :: CodeGenCXX/compound-literals.cpp Clang :: CodeGenCXX/copy-constructor-elim-2.cpp Clang :: CodeGenCXX/cxx0x-initializer-references.cpp Clang :: CodeGenCXX/cxx0x-initializer-stdinitializerlist-startend.cpp Clang :: CodeGenCXX/virt-call-offsets.cpp Clang :: CodeGenCXX/x86-64-abi-sret-vs-2word...

On Apr 24, 2012, at 8:05 PM, 陳韋任 wrote: > Hi Bill, > > I forgot to do Phase2/Phase3 build. Here is the Phase3 regression test > result, > > http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj/tmp/phase3-regression-test.txt > > Most LLVM failures are gone. As for ExecutionEngine, I guess ARM JIT is > not at a good shape at this moment, right? Perhaps we should focus on Clang >

Le mardi 27 mars 2012 à 14:36 -0700, Bill Wendling a écrit : > IMPORTANT! IMPORTANT! IMPORTANT! > [...] > By the way, we are looking for ARM testers. There was a lot of interest in the 3.0 release for an ARM release. We will try to do one this release on a trial basis. We are looking for ARMv7 cortex-a8 and cortex-a9 on Linux. If you are interested, I can upload the current trunk

> On 2015-Nov-05, at 08:31, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:26 AM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: >> Ah I see. >> >> I can't think of a way that would help users in any particular way offhand. >> I hadn't considered exposing it to clang users - do you think there is merit

IMPORTANT! IMPORTANT! IMPORTANT! We will be branching for the 3.1 release on April 16th! :-) This gives us a little over two weeks to get the trees into the most stable condition we can. What this means for you: All major features for the 3.1 release should be finished or near completion by the April 16th. After April 16th, we will accept only bug fixes and patches which do not change the

...res should be addressed first as top priority? Are there any low-hanging fruit that look easy to fix (looking at the full log)? Fang powerpc-darwin8-g++-4.0.1 bootstrap test summary: ******************** Testing Time: 65105.62s ******************** Unexpected Passing Tests (1): Clang :: CodeGenCXX/member-alignment.cpp ******************** Failing Tests (204): Clang : : CXX/expr/expr.unary/expr.unary.noexcept/cg.cpp Clang : : CodeGen/2003-08-17-DeadCodeShortCircuit.c Clang : : CodeGen/2004-06-17-UnorderedBuiltins.c Clang : : CodeGen/bitfield-promote.c Clang : :...

...>isDependentType()) return getOrCreateType(CGM.getContext().getTypeDeclType(RDecl), getOrCreateMainFile()); - return TheCU; + return llvm::DIScope(); } /// getFunctionName - Get function name for the given FunctionDecl. If the diff --git test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-namespace.cpp test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-namespace.cpp index a2d7ede..03e70c7 100644 --- test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-namespace.cpp +++ test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-namespace.cpp @@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ int func(bool b) { // CHECK: [[I:![0-9]*]] = {{.*}}, metadata [[NS]], metadata !"i",...

...' 'build_alias=ppc-redhat-linux' '--with-optimize-option=-O3 -Werror' '--prefix=/home/chapuni/BUILD/llvm-ppc-static/install/stage1'" Failing Tests (39): Clang :: CXX/expr/expr.unary/expr.unary.noexcept/cg.cpp Clang :: CodeGen/bitfield-promote.c Clang :: CodeGenCXX/debug-info-byval.cpp Clang :: CodeGenCXX/debug-info-namespace.cpp Clang :: CodeGenCXX/vtable-debug-info.cpp Clang :: Driver/hello.c Clang :: Index/c-index-api-loadTU-test.m Clang :: Index/c-index-getCursor-test.m Clang :: Index/c-index-pch.c Clang :: PCH/chain-cxx.cpp...

Update: > Clang :: CodeGenCXX/cxx0x-initializer-stdinitializerlist.cpp > > Seems to be difference between ARM and Intel C++ ABI, but I leave it to > James to comment. Use "-triple x86_64-none-linux-gnu" makes this test pass. Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Ins...

Hi all, I'm investigating the following test case that reports as an unexpected pass on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu. Clang : CodeGenCXX/member-alignment.cpp This test case is marked as XFAIL for arm and powerpc. However, the test passes fine for powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu. There are two tests of this form: void t::bar(void) { // CHECK: _ZN1t3barEv{{.*}} align 2 } For these member functions, the...

Hi LLVM-ers! The 3.3 release candidate 1 sources are now available! You can get them here: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.3/rc1/ Once binaries are available, they will be posted there as well. Please test out these sources and create bug reports for any problems you encounter (http://llvm.org/bugs/) --- and please CC me on those bug reports. Share and enjoy! -bw Note: There are symlinks

...reports. The RC looks good on SystemZ; all projects/test-suite tests pass. There are still two failing tests in the regression suite: LLVM :: DebugInfo/namespace.ll This was already fixed by Richard and backported to the branch as revision 181419 (which wasn't in the RC). Clang :: CodeGenCXX/throw-expressions.cpp This is just a test-case issue, which I reported here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130506/079453.html Bye, Ulrich

>From r167602 and onwards I get a fail in 'make check-all' for llvm+clang, built with gcc-4.7.1 (but not with clang-3.1) on Linux x86_64: Failing Tests (1): Clang :: CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-templates.cpp clang: /dev/shm/uabpath/master/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h:208: typename llvm::cast_retty<To, From>::ret_type llvm::cast(const Y&) [with X = clang::TemplateSpecializationType; Y = const clang::Type*; typename llvm::cast_retty<To, From>::ret_type = const c...

...Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Patrik Hägglund H <patrik.h.hagglund at ericsson.com> wrote: > From r167602 and onwards I get a fail in 'make check-all' for llvm+clang, > built with gcc-4.7.1 (but not with clang-3.1) on Linux x86_64: > > Failing Tests (1): > Clang :: CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-templates.cpp > > clang: /dev/shm/uabpath/master/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h:208: typename > llvm::cast_retty<To, From>::ret_type llvm::cast(const Y&) [with X = > clang::TemplateSpecializationType; Y = const clang::Type*; typename > llvm::cast_retty<To, From...

...6-EndOfFunction.ll llvm/test/Transforms/MemCpyOpt/loadstore-sret.ll # Things that define their own auto_ptr llvm/tools/clang/test/Analysis/diagnostics/Inputs/include/report-issues-within-main-file.h llvm/tools/clang/test/Analysis/diagnostics/report-issues-within-main-file.cpp llvm/tools/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/2010-07-23-DeclLoc.cpp # clang-tidy bits that reference auto_ptr llvm/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/modernize/ReplaceAutoPtrCheck.cpp llvm/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/modernize/ReplaceAutoPtrCheck.h llvm/tools/clang/tools/extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-emplace.rst llvm/tool...

Hi Since the buildbot host was updated to Fedora F20 levels, the clang buildbot has been failing with the following: $ /home/clangbuild/clang-ppc64-1/lnt.venv/bin/lnt runtest --verbose --submit http://llvm.org/perf/submitRun --commit=1 nt --sandbox nt --no-timestamp --cc /home/clangbuild/clang-ppc64-1/llvm.install.1/bin/clang --cxx /home/clangbuild/clang-ppc64-1/llvm.install.1/bin/clang++

...GenOptions::DebugLineTablesOnly) { + LineNo = getLineNumber(Loc); + ScopeLine = getLineNumber(ScopeLoc); + } // FIXME: The function declaration we're constructing here is mostly reusing // declarations from CXXMethodDecl and not constructing new ones for arbitrary diff --git test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-blocks.cpp test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-blocks.cpp index 5b20db5..207e2b0 100644 --- test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-blocks.cpp +++ test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-blocks.cpp @@ -10,5 +10,5 @@ void test() { __block A a; } -// CHECK: [ DW_TAG_subprogram ] [line 10] [local] [def] [__Block_byref_...

Hi Wei-Ren Chen, Thanks for the reports. Could you ask on the cfe-dev list if adding these flags to the tests are appropriate to fix the issues? -bw On Apr 26, 2012, at 5:35 AM, 陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > > Update: > >> Clang :: CodeGenCXX/cxx0x-initializer-stdinitializerlist.cpp >> >> Seems to be difference between ARM and Intel C++ ABI, but I leave it to >> James to comment. > > Use "-triple x86_64-none-linux-gnu" makes this test pass. > > Regards, > chenwj > > --...

I have implemented this exact behavior in an out of tree LLVM fork I maintain, where one of my users needed this behavior, and it seems to work well. What we have done is extend the definition of DISubprogram to contain a new field "endLine" which holds the line number of the closing brace. A pass late in our backend uses this information to set the DebugLoc of return instructions in our