Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "codecomposerstudio".
2006 Jan 19
2
TI 6xxx platform performance
I started my project using the CodeComposerStudio speex_C64_test.pjt in
speex 1.1.11.1. To build using floating point, I created a new project with
the same files and modified ti\config.h to #undef FIXED_POINT. Is there a
better way to configure a floating point processor?
I have a few TI specific optimizations that could go into the next relea...
2008 Dec 04
1
celt for TMS320 C55x
Hi all,
I'm trying to build the celt package on the Texas TMS320VC5510 DSK.
I think there are some #define for it in the code, but I'm doing something
wrong.
Is there any documentation about it?
So far I'm building with the TI_C5X_ASM;CONFIG_TI_C55X #define.
Any help?
Thank you.
Giovanni
2006 Jan 19
2
TI 6xxx platform performance
...From: "Jerry Trantow" <jtrantow@ieee.org>
To: "'Jean-Marc Valin'" <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca>
Cc: <speex-dev@xiph.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: [Speex-dev] TI 6xxx platform performance
I started my project using the CodeComposerStudio speex_C64_test.pjt in
speex 1.1.11.1. To build using floating point, I created a new project with
the same files and modified ti\config.h to #undef FIXED_POINT. Is there a
better way to configure a floating point processor?
I have a few TI specific optimizations that could go into the next relea...
2006 Jan 19
0
TI 6xxx platform performance
...From: "Jerry Trantow" <jtrantow@ieee.org>
To: "'Jean-Marc Valin'" <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca>
Cc: <speex-dev@xiph.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: [Speex-dev] TI 6xxx platform performance
I started my project using the CodeComposerStudio speex_C64_test.pjt in
speex 1.1.11.1. To build using floating point, I created a new project with
the same files and modified ti\config.h to #undef FIXED_POINT. Is there a
better way to configure a floating point processor?
I have a few TI specific optimizations that could go into the next relea...
2006 Jan 18
2
TI 6xxx platform performance
I'm trying to make a design decision between a TI 6416 or DM642 (fixed
point) and 6713 (floating point) platform. The application is a 32 channel
speech encoder. (CBR only, 8khz, 8kbps)
To get a feel for the computational load, I am running 1 second (50 frames)
of voice through the encoder.
My profile of the 6416 indicates I'm at 27.4M cycles/channel. I need to get
below 720Mhz/32