search for: code_ent

I am trying to implement vacation with sieve in dovecot, but each time I try to use a sieve rule that sends a mail, like vacation or reject, I obtain this error code_ sieve_execute_bytecode(/var/vmail/domain1/user/dovecot.sievec) failed Checking syslog I found this message: sieve runtime error: Reject: No return-path for reply Googling I found a report of a problem like this but I can't

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Reid Spencer wrote: > As a side effect of bug 178 (Stacker not handling 64-bit pointers on > Solaris), I got thinking about a union type for LLVM. Is there any > good reason that LLVM shouldn't support unions? This is essentially a > structure that has its members all at the same address rather than at > sequential addresses. I know there are various

Hi, I am bemused. After some security auditing on RH5.0, I was curious as to what new suid binaries and daemons shipped with RH5.1. The first one I noticed was "xosview". God knows why it needs to be SUID; it probably doesn''t but the makefile just makes the binary suid by default. Linux has /proc which has enough information that ferreting around in /dev/kmem using root privs

As a side effect of bug 178 (Stacker not handling 64-bit pointers on Solaris), I got thinking about a union type for LLVM. Is there any good reason that LLVM shouldn't support unions? This is essentially a structure that has its members all at the same address rather than at sequential addresses. I know there are various issues with unions (alignment, etc.) but wouldn't it make sense to

On 6 July 2018 at 12:31, Enrico Schumann wrote: | Just as one more datapoint: I cannot reproduce the segfault, with | R 3.5.1 on (L)Ubuntu 18.04. (I use the Ubuntu package, i.e. I did not | build from source.) I have been a little too busy and have not yet upgraded to 18.04 so I can't attempt to replicate -- but it _looks_ just like a garden variety binary mismatch. We _know_ R 3.5.*

On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 15:32, Chris Lattner wrote: > This is intentionally not part of the LLVM type-system, because it is > redundant. If you compile a C program that uses a union, for example, the > C front-end will turn it into a type (often a structure) that contains > only one of the element types (usually the largest one, perhaps modified > to have the correct alignment).

Hope one of you could help with the following question/problem: We would like to explain the spatial distribution of juvenile fish. We have 2135 records, from 75 vessels (code_tripnr) and 7 to 39 observations for each vessel, hence the random effect for code_tripnr. The offset (‘offsetter’) accounts for the haul duration and sub sampling factor. There are no extreme outliers in lat/lon. The model

Hi All, I've been having a little trouble with creating a loop that will run a a series of t.tests for inspection, Below is the code i've tried, and some checks i've looked at. I've used the get(paste()) idea as i was told previously that the use of the eval should try and be avoided. I've run a single syntax to check that my systax is correct and works without any problems