search for: code_

I am trying to implement vacation with sieve in dovecot, but each time I try to use a sieve rule that sends a mail, like vacation or reject, I obtain this error code_ sieve_execute_bytecode(/var/vmail/domain1/user/dovecot.sievec) failed Checking syslog I found this message: sieve runtime error: Reject: No return-path for reply Googling I found a report of a problem like this but I can't found a solution. I'm using postfix+dovecot with virtual users...

...t machine would waste a ton of space when integers are pushed. > While various tests for word sizes and alignment rules could be used, > this problem is _gracefully_ handled by unions. To rewrite the example The problem with adding unions is that it would require modifying _all of the LLVM code_ that looks at the type-system, and it doesn't seem like it gives us anything fundamentally new (like a vector type would). Also, forcing the front-end to generate casts is an important feature of the LLVM type-system: it makes it obvious that something non-type-safe is happening. > If anyo...

...ng: char className[256]; strncpy(className, name, 255); // Avoid evil people out there... Appears later. I found this amusing. Anyway I hope it''s apparent this is exploitable. xosview doesn''t appear to drop privs. Also, that is _by no means the only vulnerable section of code_, just the stupidest bit. Temp. (and probably permanent) solution: "chmod u-s `which xosview`. Anyway well done RedHat for "blunder of the week". Still fuming, Chris PS. Whilst you''re at it RedHat, fix the X libraries (new security holes just found) as well as dhcpd (remo...

As a side effect of bug 178 (Stacker not handling 64-bit pointers on Solaris), I got thinking about a union type for LLVM. Is there any good reason that LLVM shouldn't support unions? This is essentially a structure that has its members all at the same address rather than at sequential addresses. I know there are various issues with unions (alignment, etc.) but wouldn't it make sense to

On 6 July 2018 at 12:31, Enrico Schumann wrote: | Just as one more datapoint: I cannot reproduce the segfault, with | R 3.5.1 on (L)Ubuntu 18.04. (I use the Ubuntu package, i.e. I did not | build from source.) I have been a little too busy and have not yet upgraded to 18.04 so I can't attempt to replicate -- but it _looks_ just like a garden variety binary mismatch. We _know_ R 3.5.*

...d waste a ton of space when integers are pushed. Why? The union would still be 64-bits long. If we increase the integer value size to 64-bits it won't be a waste, it'll be a "feature" :) > The problem with adding unions is that it would require modifying _all of > the LLVM code_ that looks at the type-system, and it doesn't seem like it > gives us anything fundamentally new (like a vector type would). Also, > forcing the front-end to generate casts is an important feature of the > LLVM type-system: it makes it obvious that something non-type-safe is > happ...

Hope one of you could help with the following question/problem: We would like to explain the spatial distribution of juvenile fish. We have 2135 records, from 75 vessels (code_tripnr) and 7 to 39 observations for each vessel, hence the random effect for code_tripnr. The offset (‘offsetter’) accounts for the haul duration and sub sampling factor. There are no extreme outliers in lat/lon. The model we try to fit is: > gamm3<-gamm(count~offset(offsetter)+s(lon,lat)...

Hi All, I've been having a little trouble with creating a loop that will run a a series of t.tests for inspection, Below is the code i've tried, and some checks i've looked at. I've used the get(paste()) idea as i was told previously that the use of the eval should try and be avoided. I've run a single syntax to check that my systax is correct and works without any problems