Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "coaelsced".
2008 Feb 20
0
[LLVMdev] Bug? Coalescing & Updating Subreg Intervals
...14, David Greene wrote:
> I discovered this through an assert I put into some of my own code. I want
> to know if that assert is bogus or if there's a bug here.
A little more information: the assert checks that after coalescing two nodes,
all subregister live intervals for the register coaelsced to now interfere
with whatever the eliminated live interval interfered with, since the
superregister live interval now contains information from the eliminated live
interval and thus it interferes with whatever the eliminated live interval
interfered with (and thuis so should the subregister li...
2008 Feb 20
3
[LLVMdev] Bug? Coalescing & Updating Subreg Intervals
I have a question about what is going on at line 754 of
SimpleRegisterCoalescing.cpp. The comment says we are
updating the live intervals for subregisters. This happens when
we coalesce to a physical register.
Now, I read that as, "merge in the range information from the
eliminated live interval to the subregister live interval," but that
appears to not be what happens.
In my case,
2008 Feb 21
2
[LLVMdev] Bug? Coalescing & Updating Subreg Intervals
...overed this through an assert I put into some of my own
>> code. I want
>> to know if that assert is bogus or if there's a bug here.
>
> A little more information: the assert checks that after coalescing
> two nodes,
> all subregister live intervals for the register coaelsced to now
> interfere
> with whatever the eliminated live interval interfered with, since the
> superregister live interval now contains information from the
> eliminated live
> interval and thus it interferes with whatever the eliminated live
> interval
> interfered with (a...