search for: cnames

Hi, I'm testing: $ sudo nsd-control status version: 4.0.1 verbosity: 2 I found a loop problem with this record: * IN CNAME none ("none" means no matching record in zone and therefore match * again) Queries that use "* CNAME" will result in a loop. The response will use TCP and will be limited to 65k bytes $ dig @127.0.0.1 sdfgsfg.test.com ;; Truncated,

the patrikx3.com is my domain my AD DC domain is p3x-dc.patrikx3.com, you can see: root at server:~# cat /etc/bind/zones/enp1s0f3/patrikx3.com ; Replaces on ennp1s0f2 to ennp1s0f3 ; 192.168.81. 192.168.78. ; 2001:470:1f1b:5b5:21b:21ff:fea6:ce92 2001:470:1f1b:5b3:21b:21ff:fea6:ce93 ; format is done with xed Linux Mint, not using tab, only space $TTL 3600 @

...orks fine, so the records is there and works. ? when i run : samba-tool dns query DC.internal.domain.tld domain.tld?websitename1 CNAME ( also tested with : samba-tool dns query DC.internal.domain.tld domain.tld?websitename1.domain.tld CNAME ) result :??Name=, Records=0, Children=0 now i have 2 cnames to the same host..? and samba-tool dns query ADDC.internal.domain.tld domain.tld?websitename2 CNAME result : CNAME: websitename2.internal.domain.tld. (flags=f0, serial=2, ttl=3600) ? Did we hit a bug here? ? ? Greetz, ? Louis ? ?

hi again. after some tests, (on my operational domain and on a new testdomain) i detected this behavior: on samba 4.11.6 sometimes the new DNS-records finisches on a wrong dns zone. the problem occurs, if more then 5 records are created with the same name in more then one domain zone for example: testa1.jupiter.mydom.org testa2.jupiter.mydom.org testa3.jupiter.mydom.org

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Markus Mayer <mmayer at broadcom.com> wrote: > Call strtolower() rather than walking the string explicitly to convert > it to lowercase. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer at broadcom.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c | 7 +------ > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git

Funny you should post this now. I was just cleaning up some DNS records and the following happend. I had to PTR records with an empty timestamp. I deleted them and wanted to recreate them. My reverse Zones are 0.168.192.in-addr.arpa and 2.168.192.in-addr.arpa both of the records I delted were in the "0" zone. The first i recreated with: samba-tool dns add dc1

...ated from a Samba 3.x NT Domain to a Samba AD Domain using Samba 4.7.x. However, there are still some issues and I hope for your help. The biggest problem so far follows: For historical reasons our Samba file servers carry a lot of aliases. Now that they have become AD Members I did set a lot of CNAMEs in the AD DNS (using the Windows DNS Tool). Most of the aliases do work, but not the CNAMEs which carry the name of server which did previuosly exit. E.g. we used to have a server named smb6. I rsync'd the content to a new server named smb8, shut down the old server and set a CNAME smb6 point...

Hi All, I'm using samba 4.0.0alpha21-GIT-UNKNOWN provisioned to use the internal dns server. I'm having a bit of trouble adding a CNAME entry, or more correctly, getting it to resolve after adding. Prior to adding the CNAME a query returns (the relevant record); Name=centos, Records=1, Children=0 A: 192.168.1.11 (flags=f0, serial=2, ttl=900) It's more than likely me doing

hi, after i test nsd i find the following. if i use this in a zone file: $ORIGIN example.com. CNAME www www CNAME x x A 1.2.3.4 then it's excepted by nsd what's more give the proper result. if the slave is nsd than there is no problem, while if the slave is bind i've got the following error:

On 05/08/2019 11:53, Patrik wrote: > the ?? file "/etc/bind/zones/enp1s0f3/patrikx3.com > <http://patrikx3.com/>"; are my domain names A, AAAA, CNAME-s, that is > where i store then, there is know AD records at all. it is all DLZ. > *_ > _* If 'patrikx3.com' is a registered dns domain name, then you should have used a subdomain of this for the AD dns

...> > However, there are still some issues and I hope for your help. > > > > The biggest problem so far follows: > > > > For historical reasons our Samba file servers carry a lot > of aliases. > > Now that they have become AD Members I did set a lot of > CNAMEs in the AD > > DNS (using the Windows DNS Tool). Most of the aliases do > work, but not > > the CNAMEs which carry the name of server which did previuosly exit. > > > > E.g. we used to have a server named smb6. I rsync'd the content to a > > new server named sm...

Hello, It seems Samba4 is having problems with CNAME records. I am seeing the same behavior as mentioned in the thread below. Is there any ETA on a fix for this? This is identical to the problem with MX records. This is currently a much bigger problem than the MX records. I appreciate any assistance. [root at DC1 var]# dig autodiscover.testdom.com CNAME ; <<>> DiG

Hi, Has any one had problems with mail clients were your DNS is like this; doman.com MX 50 mail.domain.com domain.com MX 100 mail2.domain.com domain.com CNAME www.domain.com -aurf

On 1 July 2016 at 18:18, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Markus Mayer <mmayer at broadcom.com> wrote: >> Call strtolower() rather than walking the string explicitly to convert >> it to lowercase. >> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer at broadcom.com> >> --- >>

Hello Samba Mailing List We cannot ping or browse to our web site hosted on Amazon S3 because the CNAME entry in our Samba 4 Internal DNS does not resolve properly, and this maybe because of the old version of Samba we are running on our DC. Samba version... 4.1.0pre1-GIT-8aae8b5 Command line used to add CNAME entry... $ /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool dns add dc1 domain.com www CNAME

I am currently in the progress of testing the replacement of a Windows 2003 DC with a Samba4-based one. In the DNS of old Windows DC we had CNAME entries to alias www.domain.com to serverX.domain.com and ftp.domain.com to serverY.domain.com. This is working and can be tested successfully with dig The CNAME entries were correctly replicated across to the internal DNS server on the new Samba4 DC

...correct columns form layout that is read in second. It appears that colClasses fails to adopt the new structure after the first iteration. Is there some way to clear colClasses of flush the write buffer between iterations? Thanks, Aaron for(i in 1:length(fullnames.in)) { cnames<- read.table(fullnames.in[i], header=FALSE, sep="\t", na.strings="", nrows=1, row.names = NULL , skip=9, fill=TRUE, quote="") #initialize col.classes to NULL vector seq(1,length(cnames))->column.classes...

Samba 4.0.0 I am running all of these commands from the PDC DC1. /etc/resolv.conf domain mydomain.com nameserver 127.0.0.1 smb.conf does have a dns forwarder = 192.168.1.2 samba-001 the actual host name, and also a PDC, in the same domain. I would like to have the alias my-server point to samba-001. I added a CNAME record: bin/samba-tool dns add 127.0.0.1 mydomain.com my-server CNAME

Hi, Recently we have migrated from samba 3 nt domain to samba 4 AD (4.4.5) and we have detected that some applications are not working correctly, this applications need to access to \\ip resource, with name works, but we have some applications that needs to work only by ip Also detected this problem with some cname in dns are not responding we use bind9 + dlz, and we if we access from \\name

Not sure if this is the best place to ask this question (and if so, please point me to a better listserv), but is there anything "wrong" RFC or best practice wise with pointing a CNAME record to a DNS server? (I'm using EveryDNS.net, and I'd like to make my CNAME records ns1-> 4.myDomain.com correspond to ns1->ns4.EveryDNS.net.) -------------- next part -------------- An