search for: cmynhier

...-- with the resulting output: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tracing... Hit Ctrl-C to end. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I''ve put up a webrev for this at the following URL: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~cmynhier/brendan/ [1] http://www.brendangregg.com/dtrace.html

Hi, ok I know zfs-fuse is still incomplete and performance has not been considered, but still, before I''m going to use it for my /home I wanted a rough estimate. Another benchmark already asserted that zfs by itself, on Solaris, is a very fast beast (http://cmynhier.blogspot.com/2006/05/zfs-benchmarking.html), faster than ext3 on Linux and also faster than UFS. Interestingly UFS seems to be faster than ext3, I didn''t know that. So, as a "feeling" benchmark I copied my home over to zfs-fuse, fired up Eclipse, and did a build of a large Jav...

How would I determine the address of the ulwp_t structure for the current thread of a process from a 32-bit i386 executable looking at a 32-bit executable? (This is in support of a fix for 6593259: "libdtrace should prefer pid probes to breakpoints".) For example, if I compile the following code 64-bit snippet, I can get that address from 32-bit or 64-bit executables:

I've searched the archive for this mailing list and the bug list for OpenSSH for this, and I'm finding nothing. I'd appreciate it if somoene could point me to an existing thread about this. (I know that other people are aware of the problem, though, so I'm a bit surprised to find nothing.) We're running OpenSSH under Solaris 10 using SMF instead of a legacy init script. SMF