search for: cmp32ri

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: >> As a simplification, the compiler deals almost exclusively in pseudo >> instructions. By x86 analogy, using pseudos to unfold a TEST32rm into >> MOV32rm + TEST32rr means I can skip the complex operand fitting effort >> needed to pick specific machine instructions. There are many

..., %noreg ADJCALLSTACKDOWN64 0, %RSP<imp-def>, %EFLAGS<imp-def>, %RSP<imp-use> CALL64pcrel32 <ga:@atoi>, <regmask>, %RSP<imp-use>, %RDI<imp-use,kill>, %EAX<imp-def> ADJCALLSTACKUP64 0, 0, %RSP<imp-def>, %EFLAGS<imp-def>, %RSP<imp-use> CMP32ri %EAX<kill>, 5, %EFLAGS<imp-def> JNE_4 <BB#2>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> But at the end, I get this error : fatal error: error in backend: unsupported relocation of undefined symbol 'LBB0_0' Any idea on what can the problem be ? Thx, cheers