Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "cmp08".
Did you mean:
cmp0
2013 Aug 08
3
Re: libvirt possibly ignoring cache=none ?
...his is wanted behavior and there should be no need for anyone
> to minimize this.
Once or twice, one of our VMs was OOM killed because it reached 1.5 *
memory limit for its cgroup.
Here is an 8GB, instance. Libvirt created cgroup with 12.3GB memory
limit, which we have filled to 98%
[root@dev-cmp08 ~]# cgget -r memory.limit_in_bytes -r
memory.usage_in_bytes libvirt/qemu/i-000009fa
libvirt/qemu/i-000009fa:
memory.limit_in_bytes: 13215727616
memory.usage_in_bytes: 12998287360
The 4G difference is the cache. That's why I'm so interested in what
is consuming the cache on a VM which shoul...
2013 Aug 09
0
Re: libvirt possibly ignoring cache=none ?
...edure falls back to killing the process.
> Here is an 8GB, instance. Libvirt created cgroup with 12.3GB memory
> limit, which we have filled to 98%
>
The more it's filled with caches, the better, but if none of those are
caches, whoa!, the limit should be increased.
> [root@dev-cmp08 ~]# cgget -r memory.limit_in_bytes -r
> memory.usage_in_bytes libvirt/qemu/i-000009fa
> libvirt/qemu/i-000009fa:
> memory.limit_in_bytes: 13215727616
> memory.usage_in_bytes: 12998287360
>
You can get rid of these problems by setting your own memory limits.
The defaults limit get s...
2013 Aug 07
2
libvirt possibly ignoring cache=none ?
Hi,
I have an instance with 8G ram assigned. All block devices have cache
disabled (cache=none) on host. However, cgroup is reporting 4G of
cache associated to the instance (on host)
# cgget -r memory.stat libvirt/qemu/i-000009fa
libvirt/qemu/i-000009fa:
memory.stat: cache 4318011392
rss 8676360192
...
When I drop all system caches on host..
# echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
#
..cache