Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "cmdk0".
Did you mean:
cmdk
2006 Jul 01
1
The ZFS Read / Write roundabout
...lso seesawed up and down between 31MB/s and 28MB/s, over a 5
second interval... I was not expecting that... Thoughts?
Thanks! :)
Nathan.
Here is the iostat example -
extended device statistics
device r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv svc_t %w %b
cmdk0 0.0 201.5 0.0 23908.7 33.0 2.0 173.5 100 100
nfs2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0
extended device statistics
device r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv svc_t %w %b
cmdk0 0.0 200.0 0.0 24822.5 33.0 2.0...
2007 Oct 15
5
problem with smbios 2.13?
...a -v option at boot to .../unix,
then I see that SMBIOS is the last thing to load before the hack.
When I boot with -v non-Xen, the cpu coming online is the next thing to
happen after SMBIOS loads. Here''s relevant dmesg lines:
Oct 14 19:38:16 tksz330-b72 genunix: [ID 936769 kern.notice] cmdk0 is
/pci@0,0/pci-ide@1f,2/ide@0/cmdk@0,0
Oct 14 19:38:16 tksz330-b72 unix: [ID 190185 kern.notice] SMBIOS v2.31
loaded (912 bytes)
Oct 14 19:38:16 tksz330-b72 genunix: [ID 408114 kern.notice] /cpus
(cpunex0) online
Oct 14 19:38:16 tksz330-b72 acpica: [ID 426109 kern.notice] ACPI
(exconfig-0558): Dyn...
2010 Mar 31
0
Cannot replace a failed device
...--------------- ----------------------------
1 available PCI PCI1
2 available PCI PCI2
3 in use PCI PCI3
1 available PCI Express PCIE1
2 available PCI Express PCIE2
3 in use PCI Express PCIE3
root at opensolaris2:~# iostat -E
cmdk0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0
Model: ST31000340AS Revision: Serial No: 9QJ Size: 1000.20GB <1000202305536 bytes>
Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0
Illegal Request: 0
cmdk1 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Error...
2007 Jan 11
4
Help understanding some benchmark results
G''day, all,
So, I''ve decided to migrate my home server from Linux+swRAID+LVM to Solaris+ZFS, because it seems to hold much better promise for data integrity, which is my primary concern.
However, naturally, I decided to do some benchmarks in the process, and I don''t understand why the results are what they are. I though I had a reasonable understanding of ZFS, but now
2008 Aug 02
13
are these errors dangerous
Hi everyone,
I''ve been running a zfs fileserver for about a month now (on snv_91) and
it''s all working really well. I''m scrubbing once a week and nothing has
come up as a problem yet.
I''m a little worried as I''ve just noticed these messages in
/var/adm/message and I don''t know if they''re bad or just informational:
Aug 2 14:46:06