search for: clunkiness

I presently have a Samba server (3.0.21b) set up as a member server in an NT4 domain (with a real Windows NT4 PDC). We are migrating to an Active Directory domain (with a real Windows 2003 domain controller). We have set up a two-way trust between the old NT4 domain "CLUNKY" and the new ADS domain "SLEEK" (aka sleek.local). The Samba server is a member of the CLUNKY domain

On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 07:51 -0400, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > <snip> > Ksnapshot region selection still lagging and jerky. > > So it would be easy to think some of this A.M.'s updates had a > beneficial effect in one regard, CPU, usage, but not in the clunky > behavior of region selection with Ksnapshot (could be a mouse driver > issue introduced with the 6.7

The output of TableGen (intrinsics.gen) seems a bit too clunky specifically the switching parts (input the string, output the enum). Moreover, the code makes MSVC barf due to its nesting limit which even applices to if-else statements. One one hand, gperf (http://www.gnu.org/software/gperf/manual/gperf.html) offers a way to map strings to records without much difficulty (and it does its job

On 08/13/2015 02:44 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > Top shows > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 32160 root 20 0 259m 104m 22m R 76.5 1.3 559:07.79 Xorg > 23391 hardtolo 20 0 6293m 215m 26m S 16.9 2.7 21:49.86 java Well, what's process 23391, and does Xorg stop using a lot of CPU time if you terminate it?

On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 06:02 -0400, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 23:51 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 08/13/2015 02:44 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > > > Top shows > > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > > > 32160 root 20 0 259m 104m 22m R 76.5 1.3 559:07.79 Xorg > > > 23391

On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:05 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Aug 16, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) <centos4bill at gmail.com> wrote: > > My preliminary conclusion is there's something in java and/or > > libreoffice that begins causing load on the X server once activity > > begins. The full effects of the java applet in FF could not be > > determined

On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:30 -0400, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:05 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > ><snip> > > I suggest going into the libreOffice settings and play around with the graphical settings (LibreOffice->View) and turn off Java (LibreOffice->Java) to see if this makes any difference. I pretty much never use the Java features in

validates_presence_of :fname results in the error message "Fname can''t be blank". What I want is "First Name can''t be blank". I could do this def validate errors.add_to_base("First Name can''t be blank") if fname.blank? end I find this clunky and I have to put everyrhing in the validate method. Is there an easy to get what I want. I

On Aug 16, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) <centos4bill at gmail.com> wrote: > My preliminary conclusion is there's something in java and/or > libreoffice that begins causing load on the X server once activity > begins. The full effects of the java applet in FF could not be > determined during the attempt to duplicate due to the lack of a data > feed Saturday and

On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 06:39 -0400, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 06:02 -0400, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > > <snip> > Anyway, logging the user out and back in, the panel shows no checking > for updates. Ksnapshot selection for the other user still lagging and > jerky. CPU usage now bouncing 49%-53% with only this message composing > going on and the

What video card are you using? Xorg driver or proprietary binary thing? The next thing I'd do is boot the last kernel under which you saw "normal" performance. If booting the older kernel doesn't fix the problem, then the problem is probably the X11 server. At that point, I'd start using "yum downgrade" to revert individual components, and reboot until you

I have a CentOS 5.2 box that every few months runs out of drivespace on its root filesystem. Last time I manually searched and deleted some big files, but don't remember what they were or what wrote to them. The applications I'm aware of on the box don't write to /. Is there a way to find the files that get written to the most, or grow the most over time? Doing a df gives me a

Now that we're on GitHub, can we *please* move to GitHub PRs? As much as I hate git, I hate Phabricator/Archanist even more. They're super clunky and makes working in git that much worse. -bw -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200107/e47b7e36/attachment.html>

Is it just me or does Xorg/Gnome seem slow and clunky to any other desktop users once the 6.7 upgrade is done? $ uname -a Linux CentOS501.homegroannetwork 2.6.32-573.1.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Sat Jul 25 17:05:50 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ cat /etc/centos-release CentOS release 6.7 (Final) Top shows PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 32160 root

Hi all, I often keep code in separate files for organizational purposes, and source() that code from higher level scripts. One problem is that those sourced files often create temporary variables that I don't want to keep around. I could clean up after myself with lots of rm()'s, but that's a pain, and is messy. I'm wondering if one solution might be to source the code in a

Hi LLVM Devs, I have some shared code that performs lowering operations that can occur before or after register allocation. When it is pre-RA I want to only use virtual registers for intermediate results, but post-RA I have to use only a very restricted set of physical registers. Code generation using the restricted set is not as efficient as it is when I can use virtual registers. At

On 02/12/2017 5:48 AM, Alexander Shenkin wrote: > Hi all, > > I often keep code in separate files for organizational purposes, and > source() that code from higher level scripts. One problem is that those > sourced files often create temporary variables that I don't want to keep > around. I could clean up after myself with lots of rm()'s, but that's a > pain,

Hi all, I'm feeling a little guilty to ask this question, since I've written a solution using a rather clunky for loop that gets the job done. But I'm convinced there must be a faster (and probably more elegant) way to accomplish what I'm looking to do (perhaps using the "merge" function?). I figured somebody out there might've already figured this out: I have

Dear R wizards: is there a clean way to assign to elements in a list? what I would like to do, in pseudo R+perl notation is f <- function(a,b) list(a+b,a-b) (c,d) <- f(1,2) and have c be assigned 1+2 and d be assigned 1-2. right now, I use the clunky x <- f(1,2) c <- x[[1]] d <- x[[2]] rm(x) which seems awful. is there a nicer syntax? regards, /iaw ---- Ivo Welch

A number of people have had difficulties subscribing and/or sending messages to the existing mailing list. Also I have to spend quite a bit of time moderating spam and the mailman interface is pretty clunky. So I was contemplating setting a Google Group up instead. Does anyone have any objections? -- James. http://blog.floehopper.org http://tumble.floehopper.org