search for: clumsily

Under NT 4.0, using Version 0.63.2 Beta (Jan 12, 1999): Not sure if this is a bug or a feature (forcing me to program less clumsily) so I'll report it here rather than to bugs. With a medium size data set (1700 observations,70 explanatory variables) and plenty of memory, specifically > gc() free total Ncells 886738 1000000 Vcells 7912909 8388608 I get a fatal error when attempting summary() on the fit of...

...2, "abc", 2), 3, 4, byrow=T)) I want to expand the data to the following form: V1 V2 V3 V4 1 44 10 abc 1 2 44 10 def 1 3 44 12 abc 1 4 44 12 abc 1 The last row of the original df was duplicated the row by the number in the 4th column (which could be expendable being all ones) I clumsily tried a few variants of a loop but I am not making any progress. Any hints would be greatly appreciated. for (i in 1:3){ rbind(rep(tmp[i,], temp[i,4]) } -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Simple-but-elusive-expand-back-from-counts-tp3415727p3415727.html Sent from th...

...ow file is to keep password hashes out of /etc/passwd so that people > can't read it. It would be nonsensical to then make the shadow file > readable. Yes, /etc/shadow would have always been readable only by root by default. The interesting question here is whether an intruder did it, clumsily leaving evidence behind, or whether it is just a local change from following some bad advice about things that need to be changed - or running some script to make those changes. The latter seems more likely to me. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com

Hello all. I am inexperienced with R and am clumsily trying to work through it for specific multiple imputations Id like to run for my thesis.In running the MIX package, I keep getting an error message regarding the use of the prelim.mix command. Error in as.integer.default(list(alcohol = c(1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, : (list) object cann...

VMware Tools can be installed by RPM or from a tarball. We were only looking for the RPM. If it was installed by tarball, we would end up leaving it in place. If VMware Tools detects that it is not running on a VMware platform when it starts, it will clumsily try to uninstall itself, leading to misconfiguration. This patch looks for tarball-installed VMware Tools and uninstalls it. Fixes RHBZ#623571 --- lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Converter/RedHat.pm | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Conver...

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > >> >> Yes, /etc/shadow would have always been readable only by root by >> default. The interesting question here is whether an intruder did >> it, clumsily leaving evidence behind, or whether it is just a local >> change from following some bad advice about things that need to be >> changed - or running some script to make those changes. The latter >> seems more likely to me. >> > > Be it me, I would consider box comprom...

...ot;, "srom.time", "srom.dilat", "epi.time", "epi.dilat"))) ************************************************************************ Under NT 4.0, using Version 0.63.2 Beta (Jan 12, 1999): Not sure if this is a bug or a feature (forcing me to program less clumsily) so I'll report it here rather than to bugs. With a medium size data set (1700 observations,70 explanatory variables) and plenty of memory, specifically > gc() free total Ncells 886738 1000000 Vcells 7912909 8388608 I get a fatal error when attempting summary() on the fit of...

> Try below after installing LLVM, > > $ cd $LLVM_SRC/examples > $ make; make install Same problem as before. " Makefile:11: ../Makefile.config: No such file or directory ../Makefile.common:60: ../Makefile.config: No such file or directory ../Makefile.common:68: /Makefile.rules: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/Makefile.rules'. Stop. "

> Same problem as before. > " > Makefile:11: ../Makefile.config: No such file or directory > ../Makefile.common:60: ../Makefile.config: No such file or directory > ../Makefile.common:68: /Makefile.rules: No such file or directory > make: *** No rule to make target `/Makefile.rules'. Stop. > " > Did that work for you ? > I updated the source tree just now,

...hashes out of /etc/passwd so that people >> can't read it. It would be nonsensical to then make the shadow file >> readable. > > Yes, /etc/shadow would have always been readable only by root by > default. The interesting question here is whether an intruder did > it, clumsily leaving evidence behind, or whether it is just a local > change from following some bad advice about things that need to be > changed - or running some script to make those changes. The latter > seems more likely to me. > Be it me, I would consider box compromised. All done on/from th...

...> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> >>> >>> Yes, /etc/shadow would have always been readable only by root by >>> default. The interesting question here is whether an intruder did >>> it, clumsily leaving evidence behind, or whether it is just a local >>> change from following some bad advice about things that need to be >>> changed - or running some script to make those changes. The latter >>> seems more likely to me. >>> >> >> Be it me, I wo...

leagris wrote: > Sorry to repeat known facts but, NNTP ` usenet. NNTP is officially dead. Most ISPs do not support it. It's been invented before WWW and should rest in piece now.

...sure - it happens to you during the v2v > conversion? on L2? I haven't done any v2v conversions in L2 (or at any other level). PS: Sorry, I didn't notice my previous 2 emails didn't go to the list, that wasn't intended. Rich, you bounce them here, if you prefer (instead of me clumsily forwarding them). -- /kashyap

On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 14:55 -0700, Warren Young wrote: > > On Feb 4, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > > > > Again, the real bruteforce danger is when your /etc/shadow is exfiltrated by a security vulnerability > > Unless you have misconfigured your system, anyone who can copy /etc/shadow already has root privileges. They don?t need to

...ta = test1) coef exp(coef) se(coef) z p x 0.802 2.23 0.822 0.976 0.33 sex NA NA 0.000 NA NA Surely the user wants the dot to mean all the other variables but not the ones that are already in the model, like sex. I could also develop some code (again perhaps clumsily) to search after the fact for variables (like sex) that shouldn't be in there. Approach #3: Require the user to first describe a separate study design object Lastly I looked at the design for the survey package. This package first requires the user to create an object that describes the key c...

I've had success on "older" model Lenovos.....(T-410 / T-420 / T-430) but anything beyond those seems to have some issue or another. I was even able to swap the standard drive to an SD (250GB) on a T-430 and it's running g like a champ. A lot of the newer stuff is OK as long as you don't have any boutique drivers for video network or sound. YMMV. On Sep 29, 2016 9:18 PM, John

...ttl=900) > ?Name=DomainDnsZones, Records=0, Children=2 > ?Name=ForestDnsZones, Records=0, Children=2 > ?Name=thelibrarian, Records=1, Children=0 > ???A: 192.168.1.14 (flags=f0, serial=110, ttl=3600) > The various A and SRV records in the query segment are (probably) from me trying (clumsily) to add the correct record into the backend via samba-tool. I think the serial=130 and 131 should have been close, but I still get: > # host -t SRV _ldap,_tcp.home.rahim-dale-org > _ldap,_tcp.home.rahim-dale-org has no SRV record > when I run the DNS test in the AD DC setup wiki. > #...

Thanks Richard for a fast reply. Yes, indeed, im working on a nested environment. I try to run v2v inside a VM (L1) and to create an L2 by the conversion process. And on Intel. As I wrote, it fails once in few times, mainly when there is a memory pressure on L0. Kashyap, can you please share your experience? Why should it crash during nested conversion. I'm not too familiar with libguestfs

This patch: * adds a C-based security policy translation tool to Xen (secpol_xml2bin) and removes the current Java security policy translator (Java dependencies). The C-based tool integrates into the Xen source tree build and install (using gnome libxml2 for XML parsing). See install.txt. * introduces security labels and related tools. Users can now use semantic-rich label names to put

I need to find out how I can create and save a large dataset to a table based on multiple returned arrays from a Rake task. Here is my example using just two arrays (there are 14 in this particular rake task): update_tsos_offense = TsosOffense.new to_team_id, to_ppcs = update_tsos_offense.calculate_tsos(TotalOffense, "ydspgm", "desc") ro_team_id, ro_ppcs =