search for: cluing

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 114 matches for "cluing".

Did you mean: cling
2018 Mar 14
2
clusterApply arguments
Hi! I recognized that the argument matching of clusterApply (and therefore parLapply) goes wrong when one of the arguments of the function is called "c". In this case, the argument "c" is used as cluster and the functions give the following error message "Error in checkCluster(cl) : not a valid cluster". Of course, "c" is for many reasons an unfortunate
2018 Mar 15
2
clusterApply arguments
Thank you for your answer! I agree with you except for the 3 (Error) example and I realize now I should have started with that in the explanation. >From my point of view parLapply(cl = clu, X = 1:2, fun = fun, c = 1) shouldn't give an error. This could be easily avoided by using all the argument names in the custerApply call of parLapply which means changing, parLapply <-
2018 Mar 15
1
clusterApply arguments
On 03/15/2018 05:25 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:39 AM, <FlorianSchwendinger at gmx.at> wrote: >> Thank you for your answer! >> I agree with you except for the 3 (Error) example and >> I realize now I should have started with that in the explanation. >> >> From my point of view >> parLapply(cl = clu, X = 1:2, fun = fun, c =
2018 Mar 15
0
clusterApply arguments
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:39 AM, <FlorianSchwendinger at gmx.at> wrote: > Thank you for your answer! > I agree with you except for the 3 (Error) example and > I realize now I should have started with that in the explanation. > > From my point of view > parLapply(cl = clu, X = 1:2, fun = fun, c = 1) > shouldn't give an error. > > This could be easily avoided by
2018 Mar 14
0
clusterApply arguments
This is nothing specific to parallel::clusterApply() per se. It is the default behavior of R where it allows for partial argument names. I don't think there's much that can be done here except always using fully named arguments to the "apply" function itself as you show. You can "alert" yourself when there's a mistake by using: options(warnPartialMatchArgs =
2009 Jun 11
3
deSolve question
Dear All, I like to simulate a physiologically based pharmacokinetics model using R but am having a problem with the daspk routine. The same problem has been implemented in Berkeley madonna and Winbugs so that I know that it is working. However, with daspk it is not, and the numbers are everywhere! Please see the following and let me know if I am missing something... Thanks a lot in advance,
2005 Dec 22
1
Problems with passing ... to a function
Dear useRs! I have written a function that should pass argument "m" to the next function, however it does not! Please have a look at the function below that shows a problem and tell me what I am missing. As you can see, the "blocks" argument is passed corectly, while "m" is not. Best, Ales Ziberna opt.par.new<-function( #function for optimizig
2008 Jan 23
4
Synchronous scrub?
Say I''m firing off an at(1) or cron(1) job to do scrubs, and say I want to scrub two pools sequentially because they share one device. The first pool, BTW, is a mirror comprising of a smaller disk and a subset of a larger disk. The other pool is the remainder of the larger disk. I see no documentation mentioning how to scrub, then wait-until-completed. I''m happy to be pointed
2010 Dec 03
1
Passing par()-parameters to many plot()s in a function
Hi, I am implementing a function which generates about 10 .pdf plots in the current directory. I need the graphic to fit into a LaTeX-Presentation-slide, so the outer margin should be removed (this is the way to do it, right?): I am having trouble finding out where to put the par command(s). Is one enough or should I put them before and after /every/ plot() command? This is how I tried to do
1999 Jun 10
1
NEWsamBIE
I am implementing the latest version of Samba on HP-UX 11.0. The build and install went without obvious errors or problems. I have a Win95 (old version, no service packs loaded), 2 Win98, and 1 WinNT 4 SP4 machines which I am testing with. The 95 machine works fine. The 98 machine's can see the samba server but are denied access and the NT machine can't even see the server and reports
2020 Jul 17
3
[FileCheck] RFC: Add support for line anchors.
Hello, I was wondering about extending FileCheck to enable creating line anchors. These are numeric variables that hold the value of the line number that where they were defined. The motivation for this comes from test cases using clang-based diagnostics which often include notes attached to source locations in different parts of the file. In order to test for the correct location of the note,
2006 Mar 13
1
Building help pages
Hello! I was just wondering, why only one of my "Rd" files is converted in "chm" format (REGE) and the other are not when installing a package? The output from installing a package on WinXp is below. I tried to find more information about what "chm" format actually is, however have found none. Best regards and thaks for any replies, Ales Ziberna
2005 May 07
3
passwordless ssh
Hi, I am just migrating to Centos from fedora core 3. I have 3 boxes involved here: Box A --Fedora 3 (doing the dns, http, sendmail serving duties) Box B --CentOS Box C --CentOS I used to run root passwordless ssh both ways from boxes A and B mainly set up to keep the 2 boxes in sync w/rsync ... these 2 boxes normally ran one being the slave and the other being the master...the master did all
2010 Jan 04
1
[LLVMdev] ASM output with JIT / codegen barriers
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > > On Jan 3, 2010, at 10:10 PM, James Y Knight wrote: > >> In working on an LLVM backend for SBCL (a lisp compiler), there are >> certain sequences of code that must be atomic with regards to async >> signals. So, for example, on x86, a single SUB on a memory location >> should be
2015 Jul 17
3
[Bug 3099] Please parallelize filesystem scan
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099 --- Comment #8 from Chip Schweiss <chip at innovates.com> --- I would argue that optionally all directory scanning should be made parallel. Modern file systems perform best when request queues are kept full. The current mode of rsync scanning directories does nothing to take advantage of this. I currently use scripts to split a couple
2017 Mar 03
2
How do you exclude a directory that is a symlink?
Considering you cant INCLUDE a directory that is a symlink... which would be really handy right now for me to resolve a mapping of 103 -> meaningful_name for backups, instead im resorting to temporary bind mounts of 103 onto meaningful_name, and when the bind mount isnt there, the --del is emptying meaningful_name accidentally at times. I think both situations could benefit from a
2012 Feb 10
1
Out of date instructions to build R using MKL
Hi! I've been playing with MKL for a few days and I noticed the instructions in the R Installation Administration manual [1] no longer apply. It seems that since version 10.0 (the one used by the manual), libmkl_lapack.so has been renamed/split (although the official explanations seem to imply this was already the case in 10.0 [2]). As a consequence, the instructions for dynamic linking no
2009 Dec 27
7
[osol-help] zfs destroy stalls, need to hard reboot
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.budach at jvm.de> wrote: > Brent, > > I had known about that bug a couple of weeks ago, but that bug has been files against v111 and we''re at v130. I have also seached the ZFS part of this forum and really couldn''t find much about this issue. > > The other issue I noticed is that, as opposed to the
2015 Jul 17
0
[Bug 3099] Please parallelize filesystem scan
Sounds to me like maintaining the metadata cache is important - and tuning the filesystem to do so would be more beneficial than caching writes, especially with a backup target where a write already written will likely never be read again (and isnt a big deal if it is since so few files are changed compared to the total # of inodes to scan). Your report of the minutes for the re-sync shows the
2004 Aug 06
1
Ices issues
Hi: I ran a live test broadcast today and noticed a couple of things that concerned me. Now, I'll admit I was pushing my P2/266 pretty hard, but it kept things going so I'm guessing that it's not unreasonable for me to expect this to work. I was sending two streams encoded from the sound card, one at 22khz mono quality -1 and the other at 44.1 stereo quality 0. I was also saving