search for: cleven

We are gradually rolling out Dovecot (IMAP only, no POP3) to our customer base. We are replicating between a pair of CentOS 7 boxes. All has been working wonderfully. However, to be sure our rollout continues to go smoothly, we put together a simple benchmark client program to fire up X persistent IMAP connections (using hundreds of mailboxes) that login, list the folders, select the

We tested dovecot for a fair amount of time and decided finally to put it into production under CentOS 7 (we are running 2.2.10). I just joined the list, so I apologize for what is probably a question that has been answered many times, but I was wondering if there are any plans to implement replication among 3 or more servers (all "masters", as with 2)? As best as I can tell,

I posted a few days back asking about configuration issues with a modestly large number of IMAP connections. Several people were kind enough to respond with various ideas. Armed with those ideas and Google, I was able to determine the underlying configuration issues with CentOS 7 and Dovecot 2.2.10. I did some further benchmarking to ensure that we could properly plan our server

Am 16.12.2014 um 21:13 schrieb Ron Cleven: > We tested dovecot for a fair amount of time and decided finally to put > it into production under CentOS 7 (we are running 2.2.10). I just > joined the list, so I apologize for what is probably a question that has > been answered many times, but I was wondering if there are any plan...

On 02/03/2015 03:35 PM, Ron Cleven wrote: > We are gradually rolling out Dovecot (IMAP only, no POP3) to our > customer base. We are replicating between a pair of CentOS 7 boxes. All > has been working wonderfully. However, to be sure our rollout continues > to go smoothly, we put together a simple benchmark client pro...

On Fri 04 Mar 2016 at 08:37 -0600, Ron Cleven wrote: > Recently we received a report from an Android IMAP user that emails that > he deleted without reading would often reappear in his INBOX. I have encountered this problem too. Did you ever solve it? Cheers // Fredrik Roubert -- Forsterstrasse 64 | +41 78 8170377 CH-8044 Z?rich...

The dovecot version (2.2.10) we were running had a timing window problem in the context of replication (we use maildir on CentOS 7). After doing elaborate tests to isolate the problem, we wound up upgrading to 2.2.23. That fixed it, and that version has been very reliable. >> Recently we received a report from an Android IMAP user that emails that >> he deleted without reading

We have been running Dovecot 2.2.10 with a pair of CentOS 7 boxes with replications for the past year. We have been quite happy with the performance and reliability. Recently we received a report from an Android IMAP user that emails that he deleted without reading would often reappear in his INBOX. At first I thought it might be some quirky incompatibility with his email client, but I

...m[2]: Compiling PerfectShuffle.cpp for Release build llvm[2]: Linking Release executable llvm-PerfectShuffle (without symbols) llvm[2]: ======= Finished Linking Release Executable llvm- PerfectShuffle (without symbols) llvm[1]: Building Intrinsics.gen.tmp from Intrinsics.td make[1]: *** [/Users/rcleven/Desktop/llvm/build/lib/VMCore/Release/ Intrinsics.gen.tmp] Segmentation fault when building llvm on x86. Am I doing something wrong? I've got the 1.8a package and 1.8 front end. I've looked through every document i could find, every FAQ and I've reviewed the mailing list for a...