search for: clepple_at_gmail

Thanks Charles for the clarification. If NUT cannot control it then removing it would, IMO add value. On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 at 00:14, Charles Lepple < clepple_at_gmail.com_chribonn at duck.com> wrote: > On Mar 9, 2024, at 5:16?PM, chribonn at duck.com wrote: > > > > The posting at > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/432#issuecomment-405371395 > references ups.delay.start and suggests setting it to -1. > > > > upsrw...

...tated in the documentation if the reported value is known to be incorrect. Overriding a variable that is out of scope for NUT (as with upd.delay.start) only leads to false depictions of facts; the reading would not match what will actually happen. On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 at 00:21, Charles Lepple < clepple_at_gmail.com_chribonn at duck.com> wrote: > On Mar 9, 2024, at 6:14?PM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 9, 2024, at 5:16?PM, chribonn at duck.com wrote: > >> I used the override.ups.delay.start = -1 in nut.conf and this is now > being reported...

Thanks On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 at 18:57, Charles Lepple <clepple_at_gmail.com_chribonn at duck.com> wrote: > > On Mar 14, 2024, at 11:41?AM, Alan via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > My Cyber Power reports these two values. Each pair has the same value. > > > > Would they normall...