search for: cleaving

hello every one, How to function more than one loop in R? I have the following problem to be solved with the a method of three loops, can you help me please? The data is attached with this message. The data is composed of two parts, cleaved (denoted by ?cleaved?) and non cleaved (denoted by ?noncleaved?). ? to access to the ith peptide, you can use X$Peptide[i] ? to access to the ith label,

Hey all, Virgin post to this list - hope I've got it right ;o) I've been learning R intensively the last two weeks and gone from newbie status to *reasonably* comfortable with it. Here's an issue I just cannot solve however as it appears to be some kind of bug in R itself. But I won't claim that for sure. I have a function as follows: FindHighRow <- function(searchVector,

It appears that 3-way calling is only possible if you connect an IP phone with this feature to Asterisk. I can't find any (free) IAX soft phones that do 3-way calling. Why is 3-way calling not a standard feature of Asterisk and why don't any IAX soft phones offer it? Is it such a complicated matter? Is it possible to implement via the dial plan? I don't see any examples of this on

I haven't gotten anything from the list since my email of 09:34 EST. Do I have a problem, or is the list quiet? Please cc me offlist, if this goes through. mark

...eason to chunk the data I can think of is bitrate peeling: chunking means that entire chunks/packets can be skipped to drop channels. But this clearly isn't the best way to go about peeling because, as I said, audio channels tend to be tightly coupled. We don't go from stereo to mono by cleaving off the right or left channel, but by summing, and if we simply drop a surround channel, we'll also break any multichannel panning law. Thus if we want to enable peeling, we have to use things akin to mid/side coding (like the UHJ hierarchy) or joint progressive coding over the entire set o...

I made a few updates to OggPCM2 http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/OggPCM2 reflecting the latest discussions. Could everyone have a look at it and see if they agree. Otherwise, what do you feel should be changed? Anyone wants to speak in support of chunked PCM? For all those that are just tired of this mess like me, please express yourself in the new spec I created: OggPCM3

On May 1, 2015, at 12:31 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > Proposal > Re-architect the linker based on the section model where it’s appropriate. > Stop simulating different linker semantics using the Unix model. Instead, directly implement the native behavior. Preface: I have never personally contributed code to LLD, so don’t take anything I’m about to say too seriously.

I have one module, kibana, that defines a file snippet for the apache module to fulfill (e.g., /etc/https/conf.d/kibana.conf). The apache::params class defines a variable of the path of where this snippet should be placed, $config_d. The snippet uses this variable in its definition. However, it seems that the snippet never resolves the $apache::params::config_d variable, and I''m

Hi guys, After working for a long period of time on LLD, I think I found a few things that we should improve in the LLD design for both development ease and runtime performance. I would like to get feedback on this proposal. Thanks! *Problems with the current LLD architecture *The current LLD architecture has, in my opinion, two issues. *The atom model is not the best model for some architectures