search for: cleanes

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alex Deucher (7): ~ Initial version of the xgi driver (xgixp) for xgi xp10 chips ~ fix license formatting and remove old cvs tags ~ fix the build on AMD64 ~ remove cfb cruft ~ Un-libc-wrap. ~ clean up // comments, minor formatting cleanups ~ Remove Isa support Ian Romanick (188): ~ Modify XGIGetRec to return a

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:20:52PM -0600, Glenn wrote: > > > I tried that fix, ran `make clean; ./configure --prefix=/opt` then: > > > > [TLB:~/Desktop/flac-1.0.5_beta1/flac-1.0.5_beta1] glenn% make > > make all-recursive > > Making all in doc > > Making all in . > > doxygen Doxyfile > >

tools/xenbackendd: properly cleanup Do not leave builds on gmake clean. Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <chegger@amazon.de> diff --git a/tools/xenbackendd/Makefile b/tools/xenbackendd/Makefile index 8374ad3..31e5c62 100644 --- a/tools/xenbackendd/Makefile +++ b/tools/xenbackendd/Makefile @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ install: build .PHONY: clean clean: - rm -f $(DEPS) + $(RM) *.a *.so *.o $(DEPS)

Handy for testing with distro kernels. Warn that the resulting module is completely unsupported, and isn't intended for production use. Usage: make oot # builds vhost_test.ko, vhost.ko make oot-clean # cleans out files created Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- changes from v1: lots of refactoring disable all modules except vhost by default

Hi list, This looks similar to the problem reported here https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2006-April/037199.html by Henrik Bengtsson a long time ago. It is very sporadic and non-reproducible. Henrik, do you remember if your code was using reg.finalizer()? I tend to suspect it but I'm not sure. I've been hunting this bug for months but today, and we the help of other Bioconductor

On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 05:43:42 -0400 Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 30, 2013 4:51 AM, "YuGiOhJCJ Mailing-List" < > yugiohjcj-mailinglist at laposte.net> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > If I do: > > $ tar xvf syslinux-6.01.tar.xz > > $ cd syslinux-6.01 > > $ make clean > > > > Then I get: > >

# HG changeset patch # User Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org> # Date 1333621466 -3600 # Node ID 4b6bf18b6790e3713ddc4fdc1d63e54b4635c57b # Parent d690c7e896a26c54a5ab85458824059de72d5cba tools/blktap2: fix ''make clean'' Signed-off-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org> diff -r d690c7e896a2 -r 4b6bf18b6790 tools/blktap2/lvm/Makefile --- a/tools/blktap2/lvm/Makefile Thu Apr 05 11:06:03

Hi all, A discussion was being carried on llvmcommits about the extra time for cleaning and re-building objects that didn't need to be built on buildbots. Since they just update the repository, builds could be a lot faster if we let the objects in place. Even faster if we used Ninja with CMake. Is there a crucial reason why we're still using autoconf for all builds? Some of us

On 28 November 2010 10:20, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Or am I missing something? :-) Hi Bill, John, There still seems to be a confusion between clean-ups and catch areas. What you both describe are catch areas, on which your arguments (AFAICS) are perfectly valid. The distinction is between catch and clean-up areas. You would never print the value of %x in a

Are there any adverse effects to "yum clean all"? Does the system lose its memory of what is installed/updated? Regards, Jussi H. -- Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot Topeliuksenkatu 15 C * 00250 Helsinki * Finland Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms) jussi.hirvi at greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi

kbuild: better cleaning Let make clean delete generated dot-files and .o files. Introduce distclean/mrproper that deletes .config, linux symlink and all files left behind by editors and patch. Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> --- Hi Peter In following patch I did not make a difference between mrproper and distclean. I only added mrproper because I'm used to it from the

Hello, If I do: $ tar xvf syslinux-6.01.tar.xz $ cd syslinux-6.01 $ make clean Then I get: ".../syslinux-6.01/mk/efi.mk:27: *** Missing ia32 gnu-efi header files. Stop." Is it normal that cleaning requires header files ? Thank you. Best regards.

Dear list members, I want to perform an MM-regression. This seems an easy task using the function lmrob(), however, this function provides me with NA coefficients. My data generating process is as follows: rho <- 0.15 # low interdependency Sigma <- matrix(rho, d, d); diag(Sigma) <- 1 x.clean <- mvrnorm(n, rep(0,d), Sigma) beta <- c(1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0) error <- rnorm(n = n,

when i compile zaptel make linux26 make install i got these errors: make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/zaptel-1.4/wct4xxp' make -C datamods clean make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/zaptel-1.4/datamods' make -C /lib/modules/2.4.27-3-386/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/zaptel-1.4/datamods clean make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.4.27-3-386' make: *** arch/i386/boot: No

Hi Everyone! Just to let you know, I am very happy ext3 made it thorugh to linux kernel 2.4.15 We have installed ext3 on several machines here at jtrix.org (including two laptops) and everything seems to be working fine. Our only concern is for our two public servers. They run linux 2.2.19 for stability reasons. On one of the laptops (dual booting 2.2.19 and 2.4.14) kernel 2.2.19 failed to

Hello, I would like to make filter that allows communication only between specified VMs. Those VMs should be specified by their MAC address. The filter should extend clean-traffic but I was not able to get it working with that reference. I have came up with modified clean-traffic which works fine [1]. Is there a way to achieve the same behavior with reference to clean-traffic? Thank you. Best

Dear expeRts, below are two examples of using texi2dvi. The problem becomes clear from the second example: on cleaning, texi2dvi also deletes the generated .pdf file. Is there a solution? Cheers, Marius ## Example 1: texi2dvi cleans fine, without deleting the generated .pdf require(tools) sink(file="myLaTeXFile1.tex") cat("\\documentclass{article}\n")

Hi, I'm scratching my head as to why I can't use the subset() command to remove one line of data from a data frame. There is just one row (out of 45840) that I'd like to remove and it can be identified using.... > dim(raw.all.clean) [1] 45840 10 > subset(raw.all.clean, Height.1 == 0 & Height.2 == 0) Sample.Name Well SNP Allele.1 Allele.2 Size.1 Size.2

plain text document attachment (xx-paravirt-boot.patch) Boot up code modifications to get paravirt ops running. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt srostedt@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Index: clean-start/arch/x86_64/kernel/head.S =================================================================== --- clean-start.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/head.S +++

plain text document attachment (xx-paravirt-boot.patch) Boot up code modifications to get paravirt ops running. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt srostedt@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Index: clean-start/arch/x86_64/kernel/head.S =================================================================== --- clean-start.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/head.S +++