search for: clbr_r8

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "clbr_r8".

Did you mean: clbr_r9
2017 Oct 04
0
[PATCH 06/13] x86/paravirt: Clean up paravirt-asm.h
...+ _ASM_ALIGN; \ + _ASM_PTR 771b; \ + .byte PV_TYPE(ops, off); \ + .byte 772b-771b; \ + .short clobbers; \ .popsection @@ -33,62 +35,65 @@ COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_RDX, rdx); \ COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_RSI, rsi); \ COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_RDI, rdi); \ - COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_R8, r8); \ - COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_R9, r9); \ + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_R8, r8); \ + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_R9, r9); \ COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_R10, r10); \ COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_R11, r11) + #define PV_RESTORE_REGS(set) \ COND_POP(set, CLBR_R11, r11); \ COND_POP(set, CLBR_R10, r10); \ - COND_POP(s...
2017 Oct 04
0
[PATCH 05/13] x86/paravirt: Move paravirt asm macros to paravirt-asm.h
...+ .if ((~(set)) & mask); pop %reg; .endif + +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 + +#define PV_SAVE_REGS(set) \ + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_RAX, rax); \ + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_RCX, rcx); \ + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_RDX, rdx); \ + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_RSI, rsi); \ + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_RDI, rdi); \ + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_R8, r8); \ + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_R9, r9); \ + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_R10, r10); \ + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_R11, r11) +#define PV_RESTORE_REGS(set) \ + COND_POP(set, CLBR_R11, r11); \ + COND_POP(set, CLBR_R10, r10); \ + COND_POP(set, CLBR_R9, r9); \ + COND_POP(set, CLBR_R8, r8); \ + COND_POP(set, CL...
2017 Oct 04
31
[PATCH 00/13] x86/paravirt: Make pv ops code generation more closely match reality
This changes the pv ops code generation to more closely match reality. For example, instead of: callq *0xffffffff81e3a400 (pv_irq_ops.save_fl) vmlinux will now show: pushfq pop %rax nop nop nop nop nop which is what the runtime version of the code will show in most cases. This idea was suggested by Andy Lutomirski. The benefits are: - For the most common runtime cases
2017 Oct 04
31
[PATCH 00/13] x86/paravirt: Make pv ops code generation more closely match reality
This changes the pv ops code generation to more closely match reality. For example, instead of: callq *0xffffffff81e3a400 (pv_irq_ops.save_fl) vmlinux will now show: pushfq pop %rax nop nop nop nop nop which is what the runtime version of the code will show in most cases. This idea was suggested by Andy Lutomirski. The benefits are: - For the most common runtime cases