search for: clause

Dear R-bugs I have been studying the StructTS function (in package 'stats') and functions supplied with it. I think I have found a few minor bugs in the documentation. I am referring to the version of StructTS supplied with the release R 2.0.0. Output from 'version' platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32 status

...generate LLVM IR that violates these > conditions, we consider it to be non-conformant. Obviously, > conformance can be verified, if necessary. > > Pre- and Post-conditions for Front-Ends > --------------------------------------- > 1) Guarantee correct semantics of directives and clauses. This > includes nomenclature and number of clauses in directives, correct > nesting of directives, values of clauses, etc. > > For example, front-ends should guarantee that omp single directive has > at most one private, firstprivate, copyprivate and nowait clause, and > nothing...

...end. While it is possible to generate LLVM IR that violates these conditions, we consider it to be non-conformant. Obviously, conformance can be verified, if necessary. Pre- and Post-conditions for Front-Ends --------------------------------------- 1) Guarantee correct semantics of directives and clauses. This includes nomenclature and number of clauses in directives, correct nesting of directives, values of clauses, etc. For example, front-ends should guarantee that omp single directive has at most one private, firstprivate, copyprivate and nowait clause, and nothing else; omp section directive...

Hi, I've written some C code for density evaluation of the non-central t distribution. It works with the R-1.7.1 source code if placed in the src/nmath directory and after appropriate changes are made to Makefiles, to the dt function in src/library/base/R/distn.R etc. I haven't read a lot of R source code so it may need some R-ification, but I've tried to use the dt.c file as a

...xit 139) but in both versions (vanilla/patched) which it did not do when i last tested but looking very briefly at the results i am not sure llc-beta really fails since the programm (SPASS) runs through and only the diff fails as you can see below the tail call optimized version needs more clauses to do the prove but eventually end up with the same result: tail-call-opt: .... Given clause: 29875[3:Res:23.2,29765.0] || member(U,singleton (universal_class))* -> . SPASS V 2.1 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. Problem: /Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/tc-test/llvm/projects/llvm- test/Mu...

...generate LLVM IR that violates these > conditions, we consider it to be non-conformant. Obviously, > conformance can be verified, if necessary. > > Pre- and Post-conditions for Front-Ends > --------------------------------------- > 1) Guarantee correct semantics of directives and clauses. This > includes nomenclature and number of clauses in directives, correct > nesting of directives, values of clauses, etc. > > For example, front-ends should guarantee that omp single directive has > at most one private, firstprivate, copyprivate and nowait clause, and > nothin...

...actors. The study design is an examination of the use of past tense by 3 subject populations in 3 different sentence types and 2 locations within each sentence. I have been treating subject and main/subordinate verbs as random factors and group (age, sli, mlu) and condition (and, that, when) and clause order (first/second) as fixed factors. In each case it is worth noting that the first factor is the reference group. I would like to be able to clearly interpret the interactions because specific hypotheses hinge on the results. Two other points that may be relevant: 1) The original design was b...

I am new to the landingpad (which is relatively new too). Documentation http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_landingpad leaves some questions open: 1. What happens when actual exception type isn't listed in catch or filter clauses? Does it still return the corresponding structure like if it was listed? Or behavior is undefined? 2. What is 'somety'? Shouldn't it maybe say "result_type" instead? In the instructions printed by clang++, somety is { i8*, i32 }. 3. What are the allowed values and types pas...

...OpenMP-specific intrinsics into the LLVM layer. Rather, we should define some kind of parallelization API (in the form of metadata, intrinsics, etc.) onto which OpenMP can naturally map along with other paradigms. There is interest in supporting OpenACC, for example, which will require data copying clauses, and it would make sense to share as much of the infrastructure as possible with OpenMP. Are you interested in providing Cilk support as well? We probably don't want to have NxM slightly-different ways of expressing 'this is a parallel region'. There are obviously cases in which things...

Hi Yuri, > I am new to the landingpad (which is relatively new too). > Documentation http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_landingpad leaves some > questions open: > > 1. What happens when actual exception type isn't listed in catch or > filter clauses? Does it still return the corresponding structure like if > it was listed? Or behavior is undefined? if it doesn't match a clause then the exception continues to be unwound. Note that you can match a catch clause without being equal to the type in the catch clause (for example because the...

hey.. i get this error quite regularly, what exactly dies it mean? : Error occured at <q_prefix.c>:54 Error: exception 6 not handled: Too many clauses am i adding to many clauses in the query statement? Ben

Hi Geoff, Geoff Shang wrote: > Hi, > > That's what fallback-override is meant to do. Are you saying that it's not > working for you? Not working. But what is wrong? I've added the second mount to icecast.xml and tested whether it switch back to the original mount point. The mount part of icecast.xml: <mount>

I jut noticed this example in the lucene documentation*: title:(+return +"pink panther") I have been using this syntax: +title:(return AND "pink panther") Seemingly with success. Are both acceptable? I couldn''t find any documentation on "the plus sign" itself. Thanks for any pointers. John

...i Yuri, > > > I am new to the landingpad (which is relatively new too). > > Documentation http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_landingpad leaves some > > questions open: > > > > 1. What happens when actual exception type isn't listed in catch or > > filter clauses? Does it still return the corresponding structure like if > > it was listed? Or behavior is undefined? > > if it doesn't match a clause then the exception continues to be unwound. > Note that you can match a catch clause without being equal to the type > in the catch clause...

On 01/11/2012 02:37, Duncan Sands wrote: >> 1. What happens when actual exception type isn't listed in catch or >> filter clauses? Does it still return the corresponding structure like if >> it was listed? Or behavior is undefined? > if it doesn't match a clause then the exception continues to be unwound. > Note that you can match a catch clause without being equal to the type > in the catch clause (for ex...

On Oct 2, 2007, at 2:27 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > Hi all, > > I changed the code that checks whether a tail call is really > eligible for optimization so that it performs the check/fix in > SelectionDAGISel.cpp:BuildSelectionDAG() as suggest by Evan. Also > eliminated an error that caused the remaining failing test cases in > the test-suite. > > The

I''m trying (for the first time) to build an IN clause from an array of strings and getting an error using MySQL as the DB... Here''s the code I''m using to build the clause: zips_clause = '''' user.get_zipcodes.each {|z| zips_clause += '','' if !zips_clause.blank? zips_clause += ''\...

Hi friends, Please help me with this bug. *Bug in my code:* In this variable sub_grp_whr_cls_data[sbgrp_no,1] I store the where clause.every sub group has a where condition linked with it. Database1 Where clause was not found for a particular subgroup, sub_grp_whr_cls_data[sbgrp_no,1] value was NULL So the condition (*sub_grp_whr_cls_data[sbgrp_no,1]=="NULL" || sub_grp_whr_cls_data[sbgrp_no,1]==""*) shou...

...the output? If not, I think this should work: Not necessarily. > diff --git a/scripts/kernel-doc b/scripts/kernel-doc > index 3cdc7dba37e3..61425fc9645e 100755 > --- a/scripts/kernel-doc > +++ b/scripts/kernel-doc > @@ -1259,6 +1259,8 @@ sub dump_struct($$) { > ??????????????? $clause =~ s/\s+$//; > ??????????????? $clause =~ s/\s+/ /; > ??????????????? next if (!$clause); > +?????????????? # skip preprocessor directives > +?????????????? next if $clause =~ m/^#/; > ??????????????? $level-- if ($clause =~ m/(\})/ && $level > 1); > ??????????????? if...

...fails since the programm (SPASS) runs through and only the diff fails If the output mismatches then it has failed. This will not stop the patch from being accepted but it will have to be fixed eventually. Evan > > > as you can see below the tail call optimized version needs more > clauses to do the prove but eventually end up with the same result: > > tail-call-opt: > .... > Given clause: 29875[3:Res:23.2,29765.0] || member(U,singleton > (universal_class))* -> . > SPASS V 2.1 > SPASS beiseite: Proof found. > Problem: /Users/arnold/Desktop/testing...