Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "classperfomet".
Did you mean:
classperfometer
2004 Oct 06
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Starting with LLVM-GCC on Cygwin
...Unfortunately, it does not compile with LLVM (or GCC 3.4), as the source
is not compliant with two phase name lookup. I get errors such as:
$ llvmg++ -O3 -I. -DOPT_LEVEL=-1 -W -Wall -c pfmeter.cpp
In file included from pfmeter2.h:50,
from pfmeter.cpp:44:
pfmeter.h: In destructor `ClassPerfoMeter<T1, T2,
T3>::~ClassPerfoMeter()':
pfmeter.h:620: error: there are no arguments to
`check_state_resource_values' that depend on a template parameter, so a
declaration of `check_state_resource_values' must be available
pfmeter.h:620: error: (if you use `-fpermissive', G++ will...
2004 Oct 06
1
[LLVMdev] Re: Starting with LLVM-GCC on Cygwin
...mpile with LLVM (or GCC 3.4), as the source
> is not compliant with two phase name lookup. I get errors such as:
>
> $ llvmg++ -O3 -I. -DOPT_LEVEL=-1 -W -Wall -c pfmeter.cpp
> In file included from pfmeter2.h:50,
> from pfmeter.cpp:44:
> pfmeter.h: In destructor `ClassPerfoMeter<T1, T2,
> T3>::~ClassPerfoMeter()':
> pfmeter.h:620: error: there are no arguments to
> `check_state_resource_values' that depend on a template parameter, so a
> declaration of `check_state_resource_values' must be available
> pfmeter.h:620: error: (if you use `-f...
2004 Oct 06
3
[LLVMdev] Re: Starting with LLVM-GCC on Cygwin
"Chris Lattner" <sabre at nondot.org> wrote in message news:Pine.LNX.4.44.0410051204480.5863-100000 at nondot.org...
> On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Alex Vinokur wrote:
>
> > I would like to use LLVM-GCC to compare its performance with other compilers.
> > Something like testsuite "Computing very large Fibonacci numbers" at
> >