search for: classllvm_1_1function

Are you perhaps not calling void Function::setSubprogram (DISubprogram * SP) http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Function.html#a05a19abc8ee11d5909275d980efa1670 ? -- adrian > On Nov 18, 2016, at 8:46 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > (+Adrian who might have some more context here) > > Generally I'd suggest looking at Clang's code to see how it's constructing the...

...w to create new functions. For most LLVM objects, there is either a new method or a static Create/create method that will create the objects. The doxygen docs contain the list of methods for each class and will usually have the information for which you're looking: http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Function.html As for copying instructions into a new function, look at the functions in lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp (note that the pathname of the file may have moved; this is its location in LLVM 3.2). -- John T. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://llvm.1065342....

...on type, so you could look at the function's type and get the info there. Looking the the API docs [1], I find that there is a simple method on Function called getReturnType(). You should thus be able to do: Type* rt = F->getReturnType(); Good luck, Matthijs [1]: http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Function.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080522/295ddde9/attachment.sig>

How can I generate a new function at compile time and insert some instruction onto it, through llvm pass. eg. 1) %y = alloca i32, align 4 2) %z = alloca i32, align 4 3) %t = alloca i32, align 4 4) %2 = load i32* %y, align 4 5) %3 = load i32* %z, align 4 6) %add = add nsw i32 %2, %3 7) %4 = load i32* %t, align 4 8) %add1 = add nsw i32 %add, %4 9) store i32 %add1, i32* %x, align 4

...ize might be possible via some pointer arithmetic. Is there another way I might be missing? Or would I have to subclass JITEmitter and add a method to perform this calculation? Finally, can I free the memory used by the in-memory IR after the code is generated? Sandro [1] http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Function.html#a27 [2] http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1JIT.html [3] http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1MachineCodeEmitter.html

Hi LLVM-ers, I am trying to get a return type of a function(from bitcode file) with LLVM-C API, but there seems no appropriate API to do that. I've tried to do that with following code, ---- LLVMModuleRef M; LLVMMemoryBufferRef MemBuf; LLVMValueRef F; // Function LLVMTypeRef RetTy; char *ErrStr; // // -- Load shader module //

At the bottom of < http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1Function.html>, it says "Generated on Sat Nov 16 2013", but the hasPrefixData/getPrefixData functions don't seem to be there (I just happened to notice those being missing). Even going directly to the header source code at < http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/Function_8h_source.html>...

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jonathan S. Shapiro <shap at eros-os.com> wrote: > > All functions in the tutorial are referenced by their Function*. The > > Function* uniquely identifies a function and is independent of the name. > > I had understood that. > > So now I have compiled and run my top level expression's anonymous > function. How do I go

On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:40 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > > The Kaleidoscope tutorial has us "interpreting" top-level expressions by > > generating a one-shot anonymous procedure and executing that. Once the > > expressions have been executed, these procedures will never be called > > again. > > > >

...You could do that, it will tell you the size of all of the machine code jit'd. > Finally, can I free the memory used by the in-memory IR after the code > is generated? Yes, you can call F->deleteBody() after JIT'ing F. -Chris > Sandro > > [1] http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Function.html#a27 > [2] http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1JIT.html > [3] http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1MachineCodeEmitter.html > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists....

I recently upgraded a codebase to use LLVM 3.9.0, up from 3.7.1. All seems to work well, except that I am unable to generate debug information. However, if I run objdump -g on the generated object file, it reports that the compile unit has no children: Contents of the .debug_abbrev section: Number TAG (0x0) 1 DW_TAG_compile_unit [no children] DW_AT_producer DW_FORM_strp

...o map the arguments (llvm::Attribute) of both functions (the first argument of foo2 is equivalent to the first argument of foo3, and so on), however, apparently there's no transformation from a llvm::Attribute to a llvm::Value. I'm using the function getAttribute <http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Function.html#ab2a5fc8baaee7e74dbe47d848508745a> (unsigned <http://llvm.org/doxygen/classunsigned.html> i, StringRef <http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1StringRef.html> Kind <http://llvm.org/doxygen/ARMAsmParser_8cpp.html#a5ec5335889cd241b0ccfd4e4e58cf52e> ) const <http://llvm.org...

This is partly an llvm question, and maybe partly C++. I am trying to make calls on code in the llvm infrastructure.(3.4.2) I appear to be missing some include files, but don't know how to track them down. I get compile errors on existing llvm header files, like the following two examples: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In file included

...00188 unsigned NumPredsFromRegion = 0;00189 unsigned NumPredsOutsideRegion = 0;00190 00191 if (Header != &Header->getParent <http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1BasicBlock.html#aca229503e4f5c83a187a6a921c625fa8>()->getEntryBlock <http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1Function.html#a30f2c362631e3728d2f47a8203071ade>()) {00192 PHINode <http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1PHINode.html> *PN = dyn_cast <http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/namespacellvm.html#ad6dbabbbb9495cf1501d64a5c71729ed><PHINode <http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classll...

...) of both functions (the first >> argument of foo2 is equivalent to the first argument of foo3, and so on), >> however, apparently there's no transformation from a llvm::Attribute to a >> llvm::Value. I'm using the function getAttribute >> <http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Function.html#ab2a5fc8baaee7e74dbe47d848508745a> >> (unsigned <http://llvm.org/doxygen/classunsigned.html> i, StringRef >> <http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1StringRef.html> Kind >> <http://llvm.org/doxygen/ARMAsmParser_8cpp.html#a5ec5335889cd241b0ccfd4e4e58cf52e>...

...gt;>>> argument of foo2 is equivalent to the first argument of foo3, and so on), >>>> however, apparently there's no transformation from a llvm::Attribute to a >>>> llvm::Value. I'm using the function getAttribute >>>> <http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Function.html#ab2a5fc8baaee7e74dbe47d848508745a> >>>> (unsigned <http://llvm.org/doxygen/classunsigned.html> i, StringRef >>>> <http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1StringRef.html> Kind >>>> <http://llvm.org/doxygen/ARMAsmParser_8cpp.html#a5ec5335889cd2...

Thank you Ahmad, I figured out that, although the type of both p(oInst) and p(nInst) were the same, I had to: for (unsigned int i = 0; i < callOInst->getNumArgOperands(); i++) { callOInst->getArgOperand(i)->mutateType(callNInst->getArgOperand(i)->getType()); } that solves the issue at the calling instruction in the main function, but now I see that *linkModules* does not work