search for: classicupd

On 01/09/2019 23:44, Dario Lesca via samba wrote: > I have do a classicupdate from a NT4 style domain to Samba DC 4.10.7 > BIND_DLZ without (apparently) problem > > All seem work fine, access to PC work, join or re-join a PC to domain > work, access from a Linux samba member server to Win7 PC work, access > from Win7 to samba member server work. > > B...

Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.24 +0100, Rowland penny via samba ha scritto: > Kerberos problems due to using MIT ????? Ok, thank Rowland, I have move my problem on Fedora Devel ML. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel at lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/LW3XIRWLZ5E3C2P263H4OVO3I6UQPNTQ/ The question now is. Fedora/Redhat Samba DC-MIT have a future? And I think this answer

On 04/09/2019 14:38, Dario Lesca via samba wrote: > Il giorno mar, 03/09/2019 alle 10.49 +0100, Rowland penny via samba ha > scritto: >> At the moment, yes, Samba is using Heimdal, but extensive work has >> been done by Samba Team members to use MIT, but there is further work >> to do. > I have open this RedHat/Fedora bug. >

On 02/09/2019 11:04, Dario Lesca via samba wrote: > Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 08.26 +0100, Rowland penny via samba ha > scritto: > Is it possible to cure it in some way? > >>> [2] ----[smb.conf] >>> >> Please do not post the output of 'testparm' > [root at s-addc samba]# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf > # Global parameters > [global] >

Il giorno mar, 03/09/2019 alle 10.49 +0100, Rowland penny via samba ha scritto: > At the moment, yes, Samba is using Heimdal, but extensive work has > been done by Samba Team members to use MIT, but there is further work > to do. I have open this RedHat/Fedora bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748860 If someone have some suggest, let us know. Thanks -- Dario Lesca

I have do a classicupdate from a NT4 style domain to Samba DC 4.10.7 BIND_DLZ without (apparently) problem All seem work fine, access to PC work, join or re-join a PC to domain work, access from a Linux samba member server to Win7 PC work, access from Win7 to samba member server work. But I cannot access from a PC with...

Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 08.26 +0100, Rowland penny via samba ha scritto: > > set 01 22:36:56 s-addc.studiomosca.net named[639]: samba_dlz: > > cancelling transaction on zone studiomosca.net > > That is showing that a client isn't being allowed to update a record. Is it possible to cure it in some way? > > [2] ----[smb.conf] > > > Please do not post

...ot; - he was > in > our old domain, however samba-tool probably creates him automatically > and then couldn't import him. > > So, please fix the tool so that it ignores such user, or update the > DOCS > so that forbidden users are known for admin before attempting the > classicupdate. > > The import FINALLY works with patched 4.3.1. But when I tested again > with 4.1.17, it ends up with the bug. So the patch seems working for > its > purpose, but there is the bug with guest user and that needs to get > fixed. You are welcome to apply for an account to cha...

...I have also removed all diacritics from displayname attributes for all > groups - dosen't help either. > > So i'm not sure, what the problem really is. > > Dňa 24.09.2015 o 13:52 Mgr. Peter Tuharsky napísal(a): >> As of 4, I have tested import of renamed domain and the classicupdate is >> still parsing badly. So the netbios name seems not to be an issue for now. >> >> Dňa 24.09.2015 o 10:45 Mgr. Peter Tuharsky napísal(a): >>> Hi all, >>> >>> thank You for Your answers and the help. >>> >>> 1, I have never applie...

Hi, It is time I migrate from Samba 3.6 to Samba 4. But the classicupdate fails because there is no group defined for my LDAP users. Well, users have a group, but it is a Unix only group. I never bothered to do any group mapping between Unix and Samba 3, I never needed it. I found out, a long long time ago that the relationship between UID and SID is SID=2*UID+1000....

...; > automatically > > > and then couldn't import him. > > > > > > So, please fix the tool so that it ignores such user, or update > > > the > > > DOCS > > > so that forbidden users are known for admin before attempting the > > > classicupdate. > > > > > > The import FINALLY works with patched 4.3.1. But when I tested > > > again > > > with 4.1.17, it ends up with the bug. So the patch seems working > > > for > > > its > > > purpose, but there is the bug with guest user a...

Right now, RSAT seems not to be an option for me, as the only Win systems here are XP... None of my PDC users were brought over with classicupdate. Perhaps becuase my users are LINUX user accounts? And the home directories map to /home/user ? So I would think I need to start adding users and put them into groups. How? And I am reading: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Implementing_roaming_profiles At the beginning the smb.conf st...

Le 06/09/2018 à 11:44, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 11:08:21 +0200 > Philippe Maladjian via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> Before the classicupdate on my ldap I can change the rootdn to match >> my.domain and not domain.fr? > I suppose you could try it, dump the entire ldap to an ldif, manually > change all 'dc=domain,dc=fr' to 'dc=my,dc=domain'. You would then have > to move the old ldap out of the way and ad...

...latest RC > version). Classicupgrade your PDC using its existing domain, add > another DC using 4.9.0, then run the nice new Domain rename tool. > Though this will entail manually renaming any GPO's Ok so for the moment i will keep my.domain in domain names windows and dns. Before the classicupdate on my ldap I can change the rootdn to match my.domain and not domain.fr? > Rowland > > > >

...the problem is with user "guest" - he was in our old domain, however samba-tool probably creates him automatically and then couldn't import him. So, please fix the tool so that it ignores such user, or update the DOCS so that forbidden users are known for admin before attempting the classicupdate. The import FINALLY works with patched 4.3.1. But when I tested again with 4.1.17, it ends up with the bug. So the patch seems working for its purpose, but there is the bug with guest user and that needs to get fixed. Dňa 27.10.2015 o 16:38 Mgr. Peter Tuharsky napísal(a): > I have tested...

On 07/09/15 22:07, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Right now, RSAT seems not to be an option for me, as the only Win > systems here are XP... > > None of my PDC users were brought over with classicupdate. Perhaps > becuase my users are LINUX user accounts? And the home directories > map to /home/user ? Not having seen your old setup, but if you had a PDC, the users & groups should have been created in AD by classicupgrade, it is the only reason for the upgrade tool existing. &gt...

...ember 2015 23:07 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] User and Group management from Linux plus roaming > profiles > > Right now, RSAT seems not to be an option for me, as the only Win > systems here are XP... > > None of my PDC users were brought over with classicupdate. Perhaps > becuase my users are LINUX user accounts? And the home directories map > to /home/user ? > > So I would think I need to start adding users and put them into groups. > How? > > And I am reading: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Implementing_roaming_profile...

...t; our old domain, however samba-tool probably creates him automatically >> and then couldn't import him. >> >> So, please fix the tool so that it ignores such user, or update the >> DOCS >> so that forbidden users are known for admin before attempting the >> classicupdate. >> >> The import FINALLY works with patched 4.3.1. But when I tested again >> with 4.1.17, it ends up with the bug. So the patch seems working for >> its >> purpose, but there is the bug with guest user and that needs to get >> fixed. > You are welcome to...

...tically >>>> and then couldn't import him. >>>> >>>> So, please fix the tool so that it ignores such user, or update >>>> the >>>> DOCS >>>> so that forbidden users are known for admin before attempting the >>>> classicupdate. >>>> >>>> The import FINALLY works with patched 4.3.1. But when I tested >>>> again >>>> with 4.1.17, it ends up with the bug. So the patch seems working >>>> for >>>> its >>>> purpose, but there is the bug with...

...hing - it dosen't work. I have also removed all diacritics from displayname attributes for all groups - dosen't help either. So i'm not sure, what the problem really is. Dňa 24.09.2015 o 13:52 Mgr. Peter Tuharsky napísal(a): > As of 4, I have tested import of renamed domain and the classicupdate is > still parsing badly. So the netbios name seems not to be an issue for now. > > Dňa 24.09.2015 o 10:45 Mgr. Peter Tuharsky napísal(a): >> Hi all, >> >> thank You for Your answers and the help. >> >> 1, I have never applied a patch to Samba in Debian. Pl...