Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "classic_benchmark".
Did you mean:
classic_benchmarks
2012 Nov 05
0
[LLVMdev] YA Vectorization Benchmark
...zation Benchmark
>
> Folks,
>
> Has anyone tried this benchmark before?
>
> http://www.netlib.org/benchmark/livermorec
>
> Looks interesting, maybe should be added to test-suite?
I agree. FWIW, there is an updated version in this archive:
http://www.roylongbottom.org.uk/classic_benchmarks.tar.gz
-Hal
>
> It's also a good way to learn Fortran... ;)
>
> --
> cheers,
> --renato
>
> http://systemcall.org/
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
&g...
2012 Nov 05
4
[LLVMdev] YA Vectorization Benchmark
Folks,
Has anyone tried this benchmark before?
http://www.netlib.org/benchmark/livermorec
Looks interesting, maybe should be added to test-suite?
It's also a good way to learn Fortran... ;)
--
cheers,
--renato
http://systemcall.org/
2011 Oct 29
4
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...end to make things worse, just not really
> > any
> > better either). Because gcc's vectorization also did not really help
> > gcc
> > in these cases, I'm not surprised. A good collection of these is
> > available here:
> > http://www.roylongbottom.org.uk/classic_benchmarks.tar.gz
> >
> > I've yet to run the test suite using the pass to validate it. That is
> > something that I plan to do. Actually, the "Livermore Loops" test in
> > the
> > aforementioned archive contains checksums to validate the results,
> > and
&g...
2011 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...not really
> > > any
> > > better either). Because gcc's vectorization also did not really help
> > > gcc
> > > in these cases, I'm not surprised. A good collection of these is
> > > available here:
> > > http://www.roylongbottom.org.uk/classic_benchmarks.tar.gz
> > >
> > > I've yet to run the test suite using the pass to validate it. That is
> > > something that I plan to do. Actually, the "Livermore Loops" test in
> > > the
> > > aforementioned archive contains checksums to validate the...
2011 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...> better either). Because gcc's vectorization also did not really help
> > > > > gcc
> > > > > in these cases, I'm not surprised. A good collection of these is
> > > > > available here:
> > > > > http://www.roylongbottom.org.uk/classic_benchmarks.tar.gz
> > > > >
> > > > > I've yet to run the test suite using the pass to validate it. That is
> > > > > something that I plan to do. Actually, the "Livermore Loops" test in
> > > > > the
> > > > > aforemen...
2011 Oct 29
4
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...; any
> > > > better either). Because gcc's vectorization also did not really help
> > > > gcc
> > > > in these cases, I'm not surprised. A good collection of these is
> > > > available here:
> > > > http://www.roylongbottom.org.uk/classic_benchmarks.tar.gz
> > > >
> > > > I've yet to run the test suite using the pass to validate it. That is
> > > > something that I plan to do. Actually, the "Livermore Loops" test in
> > > > the
> > > > aforementioned archive contains c...