Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "clasifiers".
Did you mean:
classifiers
2007 Apr 28
2
Re: LARTC Digest, Vol 26, Issue 24
Alejandro,
So, i did try the script that you give to me, and the problems its
continues.-
Maybe the problem was in the IPTABLES rules, i attach the complete script
below:
#####################
ifconfig imq0 up
tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 30
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 500kbit ceil 2000kbit
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate
2007 May 01
1
Re: LARTC Digest, Vol 26, Issue 25
Hey Andreas, how i catch this traffic using L7 filter?, i´ve installed l7
filter now, but i don´t kwnow to use the kind of filter...!!!
Can you help me?
Thx.-
Terraja-based
2007/4/29, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl <lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl>:
>
> Send LARTC mailing list submissions to
> lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World
2005 Jan 27
1
ipp2p doc error
I think I''ve found a mistake in the http://www.shorewall.net/ipp2p.html
documentation.
I''ve been trying to get traffic shaping working on the p2p traffic
(Using ipp2p and wonder shaper) and lossing clumps of hair in the process.
I followed the web page documentation but the "tcpost" rule that
clasifies the packet and actually starts the "castration"
2009 Jun 14
1
dovecot-antispam and permissions
hi list,
I'm having trouble with a new setup. My server is running postfix
(2.5.5), dovecot (1.1.7), dspam (3.8.0). These all seems to work with
eachother. When I add dovecot-antispam in the mix, the following problem
occurs:
New mail arrives, postfix hands the mail to dspam using a
content_filter, and dspam clasifies the mail, running as the dspam user.
Dspam writes its data away in a
2007 Apr 26
1
HTB+SFQ
Hi folks,
I`ve a problem to use HTB and SFQ.
The first script, below, to show a simple configuration, does work
fine...!!!
But, in the second example, does not work, becouse i put more code to
clasify the traffic by protocol, http and ftp in this case.
Somebody can tell me the errors?
Thx, in advance.-
NOTICE: IMQ device is to asociate with ETH1 my external iface.
SCRIPT que funciona:
2004 Jan 05
1
RE: virtual interface
>Alen,
>
> : can i add HTB rule on virtual interface?
> : example: eth0:0
>
>First, it''s not really a virtual interface--it''s just a convention from
the old days of IP aliasing to have names like eth0:0.
> The IP exists and is active on an interface, eth0 in your case.
> The short answer is "no". Traffic control occurs just prior to the
2014 Feb 28
2
[Bug 909] New: nat destroy packet mark
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=909
Summary: nat destroy packet mark
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P5
Component: NAT
AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org
2009 May 23
0
Shorewall 4.3.11
Shorewall 4.3.11 is now available for testing.
Much of what is in this release is below the surface. Many of the
modules have been reorganized to provide for more readable code and to
eliminate a lot of parameter passing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
P R O B L E M S C O R R E C T E D I N 4 . 3 . 11
2004 Jan 06
1
RE: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #1523 - 17 msgs
Hi Roy,
It seems that I wasn''t clear. Lets give an example.
I have a machine with a single ethernet interface, with two IP addresses
A and B. This is done using two virtual interfaces.
A is my IP address in ISP-A. B is my IP address in ISP-B. The physical
line to ISP-A is 1.5Mbps. The physical line to ISP-B is 256kbps.
I want to shape the traffic so that, for example, HTTP traffic
2007 Aug 24
3
traffic shaping stranges
Hello list,
I discover strange behaviour of shaping traffic that i setup from
Shorewall-4.0.2.
I know that this is not Shorewall problem but may be somebody from list
can help me
or explain this situation.
I have follow interfaces in 'tcdevices' files:
#INTERFACE IN-BANDWITH OUT-BANDWIDTH
#
$EXT_IF 500kbit 248kbit
$INT1_IF 500mbit
2002 Aug 20
0
Re: SVM questions
...ers
(one-against-one-method) and then uses a voting mechanism to determine
the actual class.
Now, this means k(k-1)/2 classifiers, hence in principle k(k-1)/2 sets
of
SV's, coefficiants and rhos. These are stored in a compressed format:
1) Only one SV is stored in case it were used by several clasifiers. The
model$SV-matrix is ordered by classes, and you find the starting indices
by using nSV (number of SV's):
start <- c(1, cumsum(model$nSV))
start <- start[-length(start)]
sum(nSV) equals the total nr. of (distinct) SVs.
2) The coefficients of the SV's are stored in the model$coef...