search for: clasified

...t 80 -j MARK --set-mark 2 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 20 -j MARK --set-mark 3 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 21 -j MARK --set-mark 3 ##################### The traffic it continues goes out by the "default" qdisc (1:30), and it was not clasified by the correct qdisc. I did try a ftp transfererence using the 20 and 21 TCP ports, this should to use the 1:20 qdisc asociated with the "handle 3"...BUT DID NOT WORK...!!! PLease, help me...!!! -- terraja-based _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC...

...e -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 20 -j MARK > --set-mark 3 > iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 21 -j MARK > --set-mark 3 > ##################### > > > The traffic it continues goes out by the "default" qdisc (1:30), and it > was > not clasified by the correct qdisc. > I did try a ftp transfererence using the 20 and 21 TCP ports, this should > to > use the 1:20 qdisc asociated with the "handle 3"...BUT DID NOT WORK...!!! > PLease, help me...!!! > > > -- > terraja-based > -------------- next part -------...

I think I''ve found a mistake in the http://www.shorewall.net/ipp2p.html documentation. I''ve been trying to get traffic shaping working on the p2p traffic (Using ipp2p and wonder shaper) and lossing clumps of hair in the process. I followed the web page documentation but the "tcpost" rule that clasifies the packet and actually starts the "castration"

hi list, I'm having trouble with a new setup. My server is running postfix (2.5.5), dovecot (1.1.7), dspam (3.8.0). These all seems to work with eachother. When I add dovecot-antispam in the mix, the following problem occurs: New mail arrives, postfix hands the mail to dspam using a content_filter, and dspam clasifies the mail, running as the dspam user. Dspam writes its data away in a

Hi folks, I`ve a problem to use HTB and SFQ. The first script, below, to show a simple configuration, does work fine...!!! But, in the second example, does not work, becouse i put more code to clasify the traffic by protocol, http and ftp in this case. Somebody can tell me the errors? Thx, in advance.- NOTICE: IMQ device is to asociate with ETH1 my external iface. SCRIPT que funciona:

>Alen, > > : can i add HTB rule on virtual interface? > : example: eth0:0 > >First, it''s not really a virtual interface--it''s just a convention from the old days of IP aliasing to have names like eth0:0. > The IP exists and is active on an interface, eth0 in your case. > The short answer is "no". Traffic control occurs just prior to the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=909 Summary: nat destroy packet mark Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P5 Component: NAT AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

Shorewall 4.3.11 is now available for testing. Much of what is in this release is below the surface. Many of the modules have been reorganized to provide for more readable code and to eliminate a lot of parameter passing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- P R O B L E M S C O R R E C T E D I N 4 . 3 . 11

Hi Roy, It seems that I wasn''t clear. Lets give an example. I have a machine with a single ethernet interface, with two IP addresses A and B. This is done using two virtual interfaces. A is my IP address in ISP-A. B is my IP address in ISP-B. The physical line to ISP-A is 1.5Mbps. The physical line to ISP-B is 256kbps. I want to shape the traffic so that, for example, HTTP traffic

Hello list, I discover strange behaviour of shaping traffic that i setup from Shorewall-4.0.2. I know that this is not Shorewall problem but may be somebody from list can help me or explain this situation. I have follow interfaces in 'tcdevices' files: #INTERFACE IN-BANDWITH OUT-BANDWIDTH # $EXT_IF 500kbit 248kbit $INT1_IF 500mbit

> > So i guess from your prev. email the svmModel$coefs correspond to the > "Alpha" . yes (times the sign of y!). > > Why do I see three columns in the coefs?( Is this the number of classes -1 > = Numbe of hyperplanes) yes, but in a packed format which is not trivial. I attach some explanation I sent to R-help some time ago (the guy wanted to write his own