Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "clang64".
2012 Jun 11
0
[LLVMdev] Clang64 on Windows using Mingw64 yields many linking errors?
Hello
First of all, note the "llvm" in the mailing list title. Clang
questions should be asked in other ML.
> 3. Run cmake and let it figure out that its using Clang on Windows.
> 4. Build and realize that the link doesn't work because CMake pulls in the
> wrong libraries (per default it uses Microsoft naming conventions: foo.lib
> instead of libfoo.a).
It seems like
2012 Jun 11
3
[LLVMdev] Clang64 on Windows using Mingw64 yields many linking errors?
Hi again,
I am regularly building my small STL-enabled C++ project using Mingw64 on
Windows x64 and the program runs fine (it builds and runs fine on x64 Linux
too).
Then I got brave and decided to try out Clang, because I'd eventually like
to take a look at the quality of the generated code, and then did the
following:
1. Set CC to clang.
2. Set CXX to clang++.
3. Run cmake and let it
2012 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] Windows strategy?
...ve earlier today, but it gets poor reviews.
I'll figure something out later.
I no longer see support of the Microsoft C++ ABI as a decisive feature -
people can simply recompile their sources and that's it. In fact, I think
it is much more important to do a full binary release of Clang32/Clang64
using MinGW. Besides, there's the patent issues with supporting the
Microsoft C++ ABI (I posted links to some reverse engineering articles on
Microsoft C++ and they listed a whole slew of Microsoft patents in the
area). Also, the whole idea of using Clang and Microsoft Visual Studio
together...
2012 Jun 11
0
[LLVMdev] Windows strategy?
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [Synopsis: Mikael thinks Windows support is overlooked and that this is a
> strategic error. ...]
>
Synopsis of my response: It is not overlooked, it has some technical,
non-technical, and manpower limitations.
Allow me to briefly summarize these issues:
Technical: Currently, we have
2012 Jun 11
5
[LLVMdev] Windows strategy?
Hi,
[Synopsis: Mikael thinks Windows support is overlooked and that this is a
strategic error. You can skip to the next mail now, if you'd like :-)
Long, long, long mail follows.]
Before I go on, I'd like to informally apologize for my many postings to
this mailing list. I have no intentions of spamming it, but I still feel a
need to grasp certain things that seem to be implied by the