search for: clang32

On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 08:45 +0000, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > > > You're pushing the target (-0x20(%ebp)) onto the stack and then > > *calling* __x86_indirect_thunk. So it looks like you're expecting > > __x86_indirect_thunk to do something like > > > >   call *4(%esp) > >   ret > > > > ... except that final 'ret' still

...00] mp_register_ioapic, 0 fec00000 0 c1b2fe88 [    0.000000] At line 412, gsi_base is 0 [    0.000000] At line 425, gsi_base is -1043715332 [    0.000000] At line 427, gsi_base is -1043715332 http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux-retpoline.git/shortlog/refs/heads/clang http://david.woodhou.se/clang32.config http://david.woodhou.se/io_apic_b.i http://david.woodhou.se/io_apic_b.noretpoline.s http://david.woodhou.se/io_apic_b.retpoline.s I don't *think* I screwed up copying and pasting the retpoline thunk. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: s...

...ails on some linker errors (the report about that erronously sent to this mailing list earlier today), so I hope, pray, and expect that at the very least, the 32-bit Clang++ built from MinGW32 will work as expected (that is, it is possible to compile and link and execute a non-trivial program using Clang32). But the past two weeks have been spent on setting up a Windows 7 x64 MinGW64 buildbot slave and then working a bit on my own project (I'm translating 25 KLOC of C# to C++ so as to be able to use LLVM as my backend) and then playing around with Clang. My view is that the aspiring Clang++ Win...

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:26 AM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 02:21 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 01:18 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > > > > > > For now I'm just going to attempt to work around it like this in the > > > kernel, so I can concentrate on the

...c1b2fe88 > [    0.000000] At line 412, gsi_base is 0 > [    0.000000] At line 425, gsi_base is -1043715332 > [    0.000000] At line 427, gsi_base is -1043715332 > > http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux-retpoline.git/shortlog/ref > s/heads/clang > http://david.woodhou.se/clang32.config > > > http://david.woodhou.se/io_apic_b.i > http://david.woodhou.se/io_apic_b.noretpoline.s > http://david.woodhou.se/io_apic_b.retpoline.s > > I don't *think* I screwed up copying and pasting the retpoline thunk. So, looking at the retpoline version... gsi_base...

...dbot slave earlier today, but it gets poor reviews. I'll figure something out later. I no longer see support of the Microsoft C++ ABI as a decisive feature - people can simply recompile their sources and that's it. In fact, I think it is much more important to do a full binary release of Clang32/Clang64 using MinGW. Besides, there's the patent issues with supporting the Microsoft C++ ABI (I posted links to some reverse engineering articles on Microsoft C++ and they listed a whole slew of Microsoft patents in the area). Also, the whole idea of using Clang and Microsoft Visual Studio t...

...errors (the report about that > erronously sent to this mailing list earlier today), so I hope, pray, and > expect that at the very least, the 32-bit Clang++ built from MinGW32 will > work as expected (that is, it is possible to compile and link and execute a > non-trivial program using Clang32). > MSVC ABI support in Clang is very incomplete as this point. MinGW32 support works fairly well, at least in my experience. MinGW64 is a bit of a problem at the moment because of GCC versions. Clang is hard-coded to search for headers in GCC version-specific locations. For the dgn version...

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hi, > > [Synopsis: Mikael thinks Windows support is overlooked and that this is a > strategic error. ...] > Synopsis of my response: It is not overlooked, it has some technical, non-technical, and manpower limitations. Allow me to briefly summarize these issues: Technical: Currently, we have

...At line 412, gsi_base is 0 > > [ 0.000000] At line 425, gsi_base is -1043715332 > > [ 0.000000] At line 427, gsi_base is -1043715332 > > > > http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux-retpoline.git/shortlog/ref > > s/heads/clang > > http://david.woodhou.se/clang32.config > > > > > > http://david.woodhou.se/io_apic_b.i > > http://david.woodhou.se/io_apic_b.noretpoline.s > > http://david.woodhou.se/io_apic_b.retpoline.s > > > > I don't *think* I screwed up copying and pasting the retpoline thunk. > > So, look...