search for: cises

*Call for Papers* *IEEE Computing in Science & Engineering* ** *Special Issue on Cloud Computing in Science & Engineering* http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/cise ** *Submissions due: November 04, 2012* *Estimated Publication date: July/August, 2013* Cloud computing has emerged as a dominant paradigm that has been widely adopted by enterprises. Clouds provide on-demand

*Call for Papers* *IEEE Computing in Science & Engineering* ** *Special Issue on Cloud Computing in Science & Engineering* http://www.computer.org/portal/web/computingnow/cise ** *Submissions due: November 04, 2012* *Estimated Publication date: July/August, 2013* Cloud computing has emerged as a dominant paradigm that has been widely adopted by enterprises. Clouds provide on-demand

I took Markus Friedl's advice and set up a KbdintDevice for Kerberos password authentication/expiry. It took me a bit to wrap my head around privsep, but I think it's working properly (code stolen shamelessly from FBSD's PAM implementation :->). The hardest part was working out how to get the interaction between krb5_get_init_creds_password() (along with the prompter) to work

Dear R-Help list: I'm using the Matrix library to operate on 600 X ~5000 element unsymmetrical sparse arrays. So far, so good, but if I find I need more speed or functionality, how hard would it be to utilize other sparse matrix toolsets from within R, say MUMPS, PARDISO or UMFPACK, that do not have explicit R interfaces? More information on these is available here

The attached patch restricts any keyboard-int method from allowing root password authentication. Other methods (bsdauth? I don't even really know what that is) could be added as well. FWIW, it appears that when using the "password" method the code in auth.c is never reached due to the following code in auth-passwd.c: #ifndef HAVE_CYGWIN if (pw &&

of the remotely connected socket is in in monitor_read(). The easiest way to pass them in would be to add fields to the Authctxt structure, which gets passed down into auth_krb5_password(), although possibly not the best. Perhaps using a prompter isn't the best way to go, either, I'm not sure. Ultimately, I'm simply looking for any pointers as to the best way to proceed, even if

What I'm trying to do: upload files from my local machine to an rsync server running on a remote host. What I don't know: syntax on how to do this. I initially set the conf file so that I could download from the remote machine to my local machine, the syntax: rsync -azv --delete rsync://user@remote.machine.com:12923:blah destdir This worked fine. So then, I wanted to go the other

I have everything in place to move to a Samba/Heimdal/OpenLDAP auth database and have just discovered that some of the Windows products we use are required to run on a domain controller. Since domain sync doesn't work between Samba and NT4 it looks like I'm stuck: either ditch all the software we run on domain controllers, stay with our current 2-auth-db system, or move at least our

Attached is a patch that allows for an interactive Kerberos password change via keyboard-interactive, and also reports any banners received from krb5_g_i_c_p() (e.g., password expiration notification if you have krb5-1.2.x patched appropriately). This could probably be refactored a bit and probably done better, but I'm sending this in in case anyone finds it useful. The major drawback is

This bug causes a segfault when compiled against heimdal, but not MIT krb5. Either way, I think this code is correct. HTH. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | Jim Hranicky, Senior SysAdmin UF/CISE Department | | E314D CSE Building Phone (352) 392-1499 | | jfh at cise.ufl.edu

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=701 Summary: With 'PermitRootPassword without-password' set, root w/pass can still log in with a using 'keyboard-int/pam' Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

> + * The basic principle of a queue-based spinlock can best be understood > + * by studying a classic queue-based spinlock implementation called the > + * MCS lock. The paper below provides a good description for this kind > + * of lock. > + * > + * http://www.cise.ufl.edu/tr/DOC/REP-1992-71.pdf > + * > + * This queue spinlock implementation is based on the MCS lock,

> + * The basic principle of a queue-based spinlock can best be understood > + * by studying a classic queue-based spinlock implementation called the > + * MCS lock. The paper below provides a good description for this kind > + * of lock. > + * > + * http://www.cise.ufl.edu/tr/DOC/REP-1992-71.pdf > + * > + * This queue spinlock implementation is based on the MCS lock,

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568 Summary: Kerberos password auth/expiry kbdint patch Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P4 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org

Hi: I'm trying to reproduce an arbitrary precision constant from 'Why and How to Use Arbitrary Precision' (Ghazi et al., COMPUTING IN SCIENCE & ENGINEERING May/June 2010; http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/philippe.theveny/cise.pdf): d = 173746a + 94228b ? 78487c where: a = sin(1022), b = log(17.1), and c = exp(0.42). Ghazi et al. report: d = ?1.341818958e?12 whit IEEE-754 quadruple

I recently uploaded a developmental version of the Matrix package, Matrix_0.6-1.tar.gz, to CRAN where it is in the src/contrib/1.9.0/Other directory. It requires some of the packages that will appear in R-1.9.0. This version marks a major redesign of the Matrix package to use S4 classes and methods and to incorporate sparse matrix manipulations using routines from TAUCS

I have tried this patch (against 3.5p1) and would very much like it to be in the OpenSSH 3.6p1 release, if possible: http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 On that note, I'd like the Sun BSM patch to be included also, if possible. I have it working applied to 3.5p1: http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125 In fact, both patches work together, apparently. If I have any

Cher Areski, Je m'excuse si je me suis tromp? sur vos intentions. Cependant j'aimerais souligner que je ne suis pas le seul a avoir trouv? l'installation de votre application un peu trop compliqu?e et les instructions du "Idiots Guide" impr?cises. Il faut dire que Linux n'est dej? pas facile pour un ancien de Microsoft comme moi. Par cons?quent lorsque les instructions ne sont incorectes et que malgr? 2 jours d'effort je n'y arrive pas, je suis d?courag?. Je vous demande des excuses car il me semble que vous prenez vraiment l...

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:05:31PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > + * The basic principle of a queue-based spinlock can best be understood > > + * by studying a classic queue-based spinlock implementation called the > > + * MCS lock. The paper below provides a good description for this kind > > + * of lock. > > + * > > + *

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=701 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |iand at ekit-inc.com ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2004-03-30 12:00 ------- *** Bug 713 has been marked as a