Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "cirrus_vm_instance_typ".
Did you mean:
cirrus_vm_instance_type
2023 Mar 01
1
[nbdkit PATCH 0/5] ci: Get to green status on FreeBSD and MacOS
...own @FOO@
expansions at job kickoff, borrowing from the earlier practice of
autoconf. I don't see any other @FOO@ listings in .gitlab-ci.yml or
ci/gitlab.yml, but I do see that the resulting ci/cirrus/$NAME.yml
produced by the sed substitution during gitlab time DOES contain other
things like @CIRRUS_VM_INSTANCE_TYPE@ that we are NOT touching on the
gitlab side, so it seems fairly certain that Cirrus does some @FOO@
expansion, and timing which part of the job does which expansions may
matter. At this point, erring on the side of caution and coding by
copy/paste is simpler than determining if dropping the quot...
2023 Mar 01
7
[nbdkit PATCH 0/5] ci: Get to green status on FreeBSD and MacOS
I took the easy route of crippling what I couldn't get working, on the
grounds that partial coverage is better than none now that we have
Cirrus CI checking commits on additional platforms.
This series got me to a green checkmark:
https://gitlab.com/ebblake/nbdkit/-/pipelines/793156983
but depends on an as-yet uncommitted patch in libvirt-ci:
2023 Mar 01
2
[nbdkit PATCH 0/5] ci: Get to green status on FreeBSD and MacOS
On 3/1/23 17:54, Eric Blake wrote:
> I took the easy route of crippling what I couldn't get working, on the
> grounds that partial coverage is better than none now that we have
> Cirrus CI checking commits on additional platforms.
>
> This series got me to a green checkmark:
> https://gitlab.com/ebblake/nbdkit/-/pipelines/793156983
>
> but depends on an as-yet