search for: circumventions

Good afternoon, On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 14:37 +0200, Michael Franzl wrote: > Using latest icecast, let's assume the following hosting scenario. (For the records: this applies to 2.4.x as well as current 2.5.x.) > We have 2 mountpoints which are configured with authentication callbacks: > > /mount1 > /mount2 > > Both mountpoints have configured the same fallback

does anyone have a comment to make about this? (cert picked it up and we're being asked for a vendor response) http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/324016/2003-06-03/2003-06-09/0 do we have an "official" response yet? thanks, wendy -- wendy palm Cray Open Software Development, Cray Inc. wendyp at cray.com, 651-605-9154

Using latest icecast, let's assume the following hosting scenario. We have 2 mountpoints which are configured with authentication callbacks: /mount1 /mount2 Both mountpoints have configured the same fallback stream, mounted at '/fallback'. Both have fallback-override enabled, so they both can move listeners back from the fallback when they come online. Suppose that both mounts are

Good evening, On Sat, 2017-05-13 at 16:11 +0200, Michael Franzl wrote: > On 05/13/2017 03:12 PM, Philipp Schafft wrote: > > Basically the client structure would need to keep track of which sources > > the client was attached to in form of a stack. This is important as > > there can be fallbacks of fallbacks (and there are valid reasons to > > build something like that).

On 05/13/2017 03:12 PM, Philipp Schafft wrote: > Basically the client structure would need to keep track of which sources > the client was attached to in form of a stack. This is important as > there can be fallbacks of fallbacks (and there are valid reasons to > build something like that). A pure 'original mount' thing may result in > unexpected behavior. That being even

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > > > How many customers out there are shipping their LLVM-based products > > without actually including the LLVM sources? If they do include the > > sources, they may fix the bug locally, especially if they are > > capable of investigating what the problem is. > > > >

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 05:12:42PM -0400, Sean Silva wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > > > > > > How many customers out there are shipping their LLVM-based products > > > without actually including the LLVM sources? If they do include the > > > sources, they may fix the bug locally, especially if

Hi, is it possible to use some statistic computing by R in proprietary software? Our software is written in c#, and we intend to use http://rdotnet.codeplex.com/ to get R work there. Especially we want to use loess function. Thanks, Best regards, Stanislav [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...rts daily, too.) I actually first noticed the behavior on my desktop machine at work; it is also running FreeBSD stable/8, but only updated as of 30 Jan 2011 -- and the problem did not exist last week. So I don't believe this is because of a change in FreeBSD. For now, I'm (also) open to circumventions, so I can avoid complaints about the graphs that weren't updated at work, but I'd like to resolve the issue. (And yes, I fully understand that what needs to be fixed is my understanding of how to use the tools.) Thanks! Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill r at catwhisker.org Depriving...

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:51:05PM -0500, Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote: > On 4/3/2013 2:36 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > > > >I don't think the length of the release cycle really matters too much. > > It does. Someone has to do the work---the effort goes to either to > the ongoing development or to the maintenance releases. A short > release cycle generally means less

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 05:12:42PM -0400, Sean Silva wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > How many customers out there are shipping their LLVM-based products > > > > without actually including

This is a mail in response to streamripper being threatened by legal action from Live365. The DMCA strikes again. jack. ----- Forwarded message from Fred von Lohmann <fred@vonlohmann.com> ----- Delivered-To: jack@localhost.cantcode.com Delivered-To: jack@icecast.org X-Authentication-Warning: penguin.onehouse.com: majordomo set sender to owner-pho@onehouse.com using -f X-Sent: 31 May 2001

There's a large number of gadgets one can buy that work with Skype through the API. One of the things I'm interested right now is the ability to properly use a mobile phone headset with a SIP/IAX softphone. Is there an softphone that emulates the Skype API? Are there legal implications in writing an softphone that emulates the Skype API? Should I just give up and buy a Siemens DECT

I am sending you this email because of an incident which threatens the very existance of Samba. Earlier today, the bnetd project was shut down to the DMCA. Since bnetd is alot like Samba, I figured you would be interested. Bnetd is a server that pretends to be a battle.net server (starcraft multiplayer). This server was created by reverse engineering the communcations protocol, just like Samba

...nderstand their documentation to make sure I know what I'm doing - it didn't go well, so I'm posting here. There was something about Visual Basic Power Packs (which I have no idea about) being required, .NET 4 required (which I understand doesn't work right now except under special circumventions), and that it relies heavily on the Windows Speech Recognition thing (of which there is a Linux alternative, I think, but I doubt is compatible). Since the installer forces some of these things... Would appreciate any tips from local experts... Or anyone who understands this better than I do, real...

I have samba-3.0.4 openldap-2.1.29 smbldap-tools-0.8.4-1 When connecting with an XP client, which I have logged in as administrator, and browsing the network neighbourhood I cannot connect as administrator and it allows me to connect as 'nobody' What can I do to fix this, or does anyone have any helpful hints. <snip> [2004/05/15 14:20:54, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(312)

On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, safemode wrote: > On Tuesday 02 October 2001 08:14, Nathan I. Sharfi wrote: > > I doubt this; why would any self-respecting label advertise that their > > music is capable of being ripped and distributed electronically? > > > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, safemode wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > You're probably going to

Hello! I have several gzip'ed mbox Files in my home dir and the problem occurs when I use one of the gzip'ed files as shown mbox in the gui and want to see one mail of it. It also happens on the extended search from Horde which then such a gzip'ed file. Example file: # file In_2014.gz In_2014.gz: gzip compressed data, was "In_2014", last modified: Wed Dec 2

OpenSSH 7.0 has just been released. It will be available from the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/ shortly. OpenSSH is a 100% complete SSH protocol 2.0 implementation and includes sftp client and server support. OpenSSH also includes transitional support for the legacy SSH 1.3 and 1.5 protocols that may be enabled at compile-time. Once again, we would like to thank the OpenSSH community

k' then. now our problem... We have (in the netherlands) a site which has the top 100 singles in Real. We have the copy bit on, still Warner wants us to only stream 30 seconds of each song. Even worse, our on demand 'radio station', which has thousands of songs on request is threatened too. Any idea how we stand? Maarten ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack Moffitt"