search for: circumstanti

> I disagree on this. Table emission by itself doesn't involve code > generation and I don't think it makes sense as a per function attribute > either. You either want it for all functions or only when needed (e.g. > exceptions are possible). As such, it makes perfect sense to me as a > global flag. It has to be an attribute because of LTO. You can LTO a file compiled with

.../pw to map LPT1 to a queue located on ITSELF!! The PDC is RedHat 9 with current updates (kernel 2.4.20-28.9, Samba 2.2.7a-8.9.0, Cups 1.1.17-13.3.0.3). The majority of the clients on this network are Win98 or Win NT4. All these older clients have no problem mapping either drives or printers. Circumstantially, the finger seems to point to the XP workstation in some way, especially its inability to map a printer located on itself. Does anyone know of anything peculiar about XP and printer mapping?? Of course, I'd love to have someone offer up a magic bullet solution, but even a suggestion for...

Hi all, Just thought I'd update this thread in case anyone else is Googling trying to find out how to do this... I found the solution to my problem to be to use the IAXVAR() function to pass the accountcode between the Asterisk boxen and update the CHANNEL(accountcode) with that variable. Thanks to Richard @ Digium for the reply that clarified my misunderstanding. Calum On Wed, 2018-10-03

Hello, Some mischief happened and I have been asked if I can find out who was logged into their computers within a specific off-hours time frame. My logs for that time frame happened to be running at debug level 3, so I have been looking through them and trying to figure out how to recognize a workstation login. I find lines beginning with auth_check_password_send that seem like reasonably good

...e no issues running a non-xen kernel. There are no issues with the 32 bit version of the OS +xen on the same hardware I have checked the initrd and the module list is identical to those loaded by the non-xen kernel. I have remade the xen initrd (with and without the -A ) I have tried with acpi=off Circumstantial evidence at least points to the aacraid module being broken in this configuration. I would run the 32 bit OS, but need the full 32Gb of RAM available. Has anyone else come across this issue ? I have read that a possible solution is to run the x86_64 hypervisor, but boot a 32 bit dom0, but hav...

...ng issues we all live to hate. So...How is it possible that the GPO isn't respected under whatever circumstance is occurring to cause this? I guess I'm also wondering if there is such a thing as to redirect to the %logonserver% if the path fails maybe? What's odd (and this is obviously circumstantial) I can always navigate to the users redirected folders using the path(copy/paste) that is supposed to be applied in the GPO in question. So I can only conclude that somehow during a brief period of time the path was perhaps not available, hence some sort of failsafe or self preservation is applie...

...lot of information in the back-end, such as what exception > style is has (depending on the target, language, flags). > > Is there any definitive explanation on the complete semantics of > uwtables and nounwind? I could be wrong, but from what I can see, > beginFunction() is based on circumstantial behaviour, not explicit > semantics. I agree that the logic in there seems a bit odd. What is called shouldEmitMoves should probably include all possible reasons for printing the unwind tables. We should probably also use uwtable to guard the emission of other table formats as you propose. T...

I installed the (binary) biOps package, which can use libtiff and libfftw. Then I used macports to install the libraries (in /opt/local/lib). But I restart R and biOps still does not see the libraries. I've tried adding symbolic links from /opt/local/lib to /usr/local/lib, I've added /opt/local/lib to LIBRARY_PATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH, and it doesn't work. Do you

...imeout issues on slow builds, but it's not clear how CMake would do that by default 4. Windows and OSX users already build by hand anyway Item (1) was already solved by the move to 2.8.12, item (2) is pending an upgrade to 3.0 and item (3) is uncertain that any move will fix that. Item (4) is circumstantial, at best. == Problems == A. LTS Linux users (by far, the biggest constituency among Linux users) are stuck old versions of CMake in their packages. B. Installing by hand on Linux is, of course, possible, but it increases the cost of package management (see below). (ref item 4). C. The number of...

Hello out there, perhaps anybody has some idea for my problem. I've had several nice successes with WINE. GoogleEarth e.g. or some of my old tools of the windows-times. Now yesterday I've sent my tax-declaration (in Germany: ElsterFormular) to the tax-administration, online. BUT: I couldn't print the declaration!! NOTHING at all happened. I havn't ever tried to print, it was not

Dear Gurus, We're having bizarre problems/behaviour. Admittedly we have an unusual set-up: - users on linux desktops (RedHat/KDE) mounting files over SMB using samba-2.2.5-10 -client and -common rpms. - files are on a SAN, clustered behind 2 netware servers (6.5), wihch run the cifs.nlm (netware guy has gone home - can't tell you the version just now) Files are spontaneously

On 10 March 2015 at 21:08, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Rafael Espíndola > <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> As for the advantages, this seems to make it easier to drop the >> autoconf build, which would be a really big win for us. > > > My only problem here is this: it *seems*.

Hi, SSH brute force attacks seem to enjoy increasing popularity. Call me an optimist or a misrouted kind of contributer to the community, but on our company server I actually go through the logs and report extreme cases to the providers of the originating IP's. With the increasing number of these attacks, however, I have now decided that it's better to move the SSHd to a different

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > However, everyone seems to think I'm advocating we never move the CMake > > version forward. That isn't what I'm saying at all. What I am saying is > that > > moving the CMake version forward has a cost. Not a huge insurmountable > cost, > > but non-zero