Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "circleci".
Did you mean:
circle
2019 Nov 14
2
Filesystem does not support posix ACLs
Hi,
I am trying to create a build on CircleCi with smaba4 AD. It seems the filesytem doesn't support ACL's, which s3fs requires. I get the folowing error:
?ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix ACLs, which s3fs requires.?...
2017 May 14
2
apt.llvm.org: Ubuntu Trusty update rate
Hello all,
For CI testing of LDC with LLVM trunk we use CircleCI, which offers
Ubuntu Trusty 14.04. We use apt.llvm.org, but the latest update of the
"nightly" package is now more than a month ago. Previously the update
rate was once a week, which was OK as it meant that we only had a few
days of test breakage after an API change (and after a dev updat...
2016 Jun 20
3
Pre-built snapshots of trunk
...king
> whether the mainline changed. We would certainly try to limit such
> behavior if / when new APT mirror will be established.
>
I believe many projects have now switched to uncached downloads from
llvm.org/releases (Boost.Hana also does this uncached atm.). Caching on
e.g. Travis and CircleCI is not easily available for APT repositories; I
think that's why noone bothered. For simple file downloads it is much
easier, so perhaps a little explaining text can be added to the message on
llvm.org/apt .
Example Travis script with caching:
https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/blob/master/....
2019 Nov 14
0
Filesystem does not support posix ACLs
On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 06:19 +0000, Ghassan Elrayah via samba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to create a build on CircleCi with smaba4 AD. It seems
> the filesytem doesn't support ACL's, which s3fs requires. I get the
> folowing error:
Can you explain a bit more about what you are doing with CircleCI?
This will help me understand how best to advise you.
> ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.Provi...
2019 Nov 14
3
Filesystem does not support posix ACLs
...sion a samba4 AD with some test users and groups non-interactively and test commits and pull requests against the AD.
On 11/14/19 8:16 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 06:19 +0000, Ghassan Elrayah via samba wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to create a build on CircleCi with smaba4 AD. It seems
>> the filesytem doesn't support ACL's, which s3fs requires. I get the
>> folowing error:
> Can you explain a bit more about what you are doing with CircleCI?
>
> This will help me understand how best to advise you.
>
>> ERROR(<cl...
2022 Aug 21
1
NUT on Windows revival
"Good news, everyone!"
With CI builds of the branch now regularly passing on both the
multiplatform FOSS NUT CI farm (including linux+mingw cross-builds), and
CircleCI with MacOS, and newly on AppVeyor with Windows+MSYS2 (including
integration tests with live upsd and some dummy-ups instances), after
ironing a few wrinkles I intend to PR and merge it into the main NUT
codebase soon, lest the effort bit-rot again.
There are nearly no remaining "functional&qu...
2022 Aug 21
1
NUT on Windows revival
"Good news, everyone!"
With CI builds of the branch now regularly passing on both the
multiplatform FOSS NUT CI farm (including linux+mingw cross-builds), and
CircleCI with MacOS, and newly on AppVeyor with Windows+MSYS2 (including
integration tests with live upsd and some dummy-ups instances), after
ironing a few wrinkles I intend to PR and merge it into the main NUT
codebase soon, lest the effort bit-rot again.
There are nearly no remaining "functional&qu...
2016 Jun 19
3
Pre-built snapshots of trunk
Dear LLVM community,
I would like to know whether it has already been discussed to provide
pre-built snapshots of Clang/LLVM trunk available for download. This used
to be available through llvm.org/apt, but since this is down I don't know
of any alternative but to build it from source. My use case is to test the
Boost.Hana library against Clang trunk on Travis, where building from source
is
2022 Jul 13
2
NUT on Windows revival
Back from vacations, and before I dive into real-life work, I went over
some ideas and notes from the NUT for Windows effort.
Now they should be tracked at
https://github.com/orgs/networkupstools/projects/2/views/1 and community
help is welcome :)
I probably forgot or missed some caveats - so feel free to post issues for
this project if you think of some more...
Jim
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022, 23:52
2022 Jul 13
2
NUT on Windows revival
Back from vacations, and before I dive into real-life work, I went over
some ideas and notes from the NUT for Windows effort.
Now they should be tracked at
https://github.com/orgs/networkupstools/projects/2/views/1 and community
help is welcome :)
I probably forgot or missed some caveats - so feel free to post issues for
this project if you think of some more...
Jim
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022, 23:52
2022 Sep 03
0
NUT on Windows revival
...to-school weekend,
Jim
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022, 01:55 Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut at gmail.com> wrote:
> "Good news, everyone!"
>
> With CI builds of the branch now regularly passing on both the
> multiplatform FOSS NUT CI farm (including linux+mingw cross-builds), and
> CircleCI with MacOS, and newly on AppVeyor with Windows+MSYS2 (including
> integration tests with live upsd and some dummy-ups instances), after
> ironing a few wrinkles I intend to PR and merge it into the main NUT
> codebase soon, lest the effort bit-rot again.
>
> There are nearly no remai...
2022 Sep 03
0
NUT on Windows revival
...to-school weekend,
Jim
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022, 01:55 Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut at gmail.com> wrote:
> "Good news, everyone!"
>
> With CI builds of the branch now regularly passing on both the
> multiplatform FOSS NUT CI farm (including linux+mingw cross-builds), and
> CircleCI with MacOS, and newly on AppVeyor with Windows+MSYS2 (including
> integration tests with live upsd and some dummy-ups instances), after
> ironing a few wrinkles I intend to PR and merge it into the main NUT
> codebase soon, lest the effort bit-rot again.
>
> There are nearly no remai...
2019 Oct 18
2
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: End-to-end testing
Renato Golin <rengolin at gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 18:10, David Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote:
>> From other discussion, it sounds like at least some people are open to
>> asm tests under clang. I think that should be fine. But there are
>> probably other kinds of end-to-end tests that should not live under
>> clang.
>
>