search for: cipherium

Hi, I am working on linux 2.6.16.I tried to prioritize traffic using prio module but its not working well.It always maps to same class irrespective of ToS.Is it possible to fix it using filters?Anybody fixed this problem? -- Regards Archana Rajagopal _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

I have a doubt. If you use such a script monitoring the link status with ping and then reconfiguring, why do you need the DGD patch? You need to do some reconfiguration (change multipath to a single default route) anyway if you use the script, right? Also, the DGD patch uses src to lookup the routing table entry, but if you have a dynamic IP for the WAN interface (PPPoE, DHCP etc), this approach

...dev eth1 parent 1:1 handle 10 prio tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:2 handle 20 prio tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:3 handle 30 prio Regards /Christian [ http://benve.info ] ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:46:31 +0800 From: "Salim S I" <salim.si@cipherium.com.tw> Subject: RE: [LARTC] Re: PQ questions To: "''Christian Benvenuti''" <christian.benvenuti@libero.it>, <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Message-ID: <001801c7af21$4d9a5510$5964a8c0@SalimSi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Slightly...

Hello, I''d like to build a 4 class prio system based on mark (until now no problem), but with a limited bandwidth. I have configured my eth* to be 10mbit full duplex, and I''d like to limit the bandwidth to 1mbit. I managed to do it with a policy filter matching all the traffic, but I can redirect it into only one class, so all my prio classes are useless. I also tried to limit

-----Original Message----- From: Salim S I [mailto:salim.si@cipherium.com.tw] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:22 PM To: ''Francis Brosnan Blazquez'' Subject: RE: [LARTC] Load balancing using connmark "I think the main advantage of shorewall solution is that it applies connmark to incoming packets from the wan as you point, leaving load balancing...

Hello All, I am trying to setup a linux box as a forwarding router based of src IP. The problem is that it does forward the pkts to the intended server specified in the ip rule, but it also forwards it to the original dst (dst specified in the pkt). Here is the setup: [10.1.0.166] [192.168.1.225] |

I have tried using iptraf for my NAT firewall to analyse the IP traffic. Basically I am faced with this difficulty of related the source IP to the outgoing interface to the internet, so I am wondering if anyone has a suggestion for a different ways to do it, or a suggestion for a better tool. Details :- Supposed : eth0 - LAN eth1 - WAN1 eth2 - WAN2 And then

This problem is driving nuts, so I am seeking help here. Your help will be deeply appreciated. I have made myself a Linux bridge with eth1 and eth0 to form br0. Then I run a script to configure tc with htb on it. But I can never match non-icmp traffic ( such as tcp and udp ) with TOS or DSCP values such as 0x68. The full story as follows :- 1. On the source testing machine, I do this to set

Hello mailing list, i stand bevor a mystery and cannot explain it J. I want to do shaping and prioritization and I have done these following configurations and simulations. I can´t explain, that the combination of PRIO and TBF is much better than the HTB (with the prio parameter) alone or in combination with the SFQ. Here are my example configurations: 2 Traffic Classes http (80 = 0x50) and

HI All , I am running a FC6 box with two internet links with load balance . Every thing is working fine expect the MSN connection that failed and reconnect every time and SSL connections . I would link to know if with the nona howto I could fix that . I have been tried with no success to redirect that connection only to one link but its look like do not work . Here my configuration :

Hi to all i think this is not a new problem for this forum....but its newest for me as i m a new linux lerner. Even if it is new plzz....reply me ur answer..n if its already asked n have solution..plzz forward the solution. My problem is here mentioned: I have fedora core 4 as a linux server. there r two external links connected to this. the settings are as: eth0 ->for internal (that is