search for: cifsvfs

Dear sirs! I kindly ask you to help me with the following problem. I need to mount MS DFS tree Linux filesystem. I have: Linux Slackware 9.0. Kernel 2.4.21 compiling with support SMB file system. Samba 2.2.8a compiling with --with-msdfs In order to mount I type: mount -t smbfs -o username=name,password=***,workgroup=work //server/DfsRoot/mnt/DfsTree after cd /mnt/DfsTree In the DfsTree directory

Hi Guys! Anyone know how can I do this trick? I guess there is a registry value for it. As I noticed winxp try to use smbfs first not cifs. In linux it's easier because you can choose when you mount your shares. Regards, Jax

On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:29:50 +0530 Saurabh Nanda via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Does anyone have any idea about this? > > > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 7:22 AM Saurabh Nanda <saurabhnanda at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Define "lots of files" ? What does ls | wc -l say ? > >> > > > > Number of files + directories: >

...g the UNIX extensions to the CIFS protocol can create symlinks to absolute paths which will be **followed** by the server. This functionality has been requested in order to correctly support certain applications when the user's home directory is mounted using some type of CIFS client (e.g. the cifsvfs in the Linux 2.6 kernel). If this behavior is not acceptable for your production environment you can set 'wide links = no' in the specific share declaration in the server's smb.conf. Be aware that disabling wide link support out of a share in Samba may impact the server's performa...

In response to my original post under the heading "No files seen when mount[ing] DFS roots" I received one offlist response to the following effect: >It sounds like the smbfs Linux filesystem module does not handle MSDFS >links correctly. You might try the CIFS module avaliable at >http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/smbfs/ Before I assume this is the problem, I would

...g the UNIX extensions to the CIFS protocol can create symlinks to absolute paths which will be **followed** by the server. This functionality has been requested in order to correctly support certain applications when the user's home directory is mounted using some type of CIFS client (e.g. the cifsvfs in the Linux 2.6 kernel). If this behavior is not acceptable for your production environment you can set 'wide links = no' in the specific share declaration in the server's smb.conf. Be aware that disabling wide link support out of a share in Samba may impact the server's performa...

Does anyone have knowledge of any CIFS Proxy Servers or using Samba as a Proxy to another CIFS/SMB Server? Are there any documents or resources on this topic? I am trying to implement a general purpose CIFS Proxy Server (the proxy server would implement some authentication and authorization for the SMB requests) which can proxy CIFS servers like Samba or Windows. One particularly hard problem

...of a domain >> user to >> | their AD-defined home directory (//ltsp-fs1/staff/fred <--> >> | /home/LTSP/fred, for example)? I want to have no local storage for >> | domain users on the linux box. >> >> See pam_mount.so and smbfs (or patches for the newer cifsvfs). > Thanks, I'll look that up. > > Mike > > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > --- > [This E-ma...

hello everyone, the old problem persists :X I'm currently running Novell Linux Desktop 9 (SP2) featuring a 2.6.5series kernel. Smbclient (3.0.14a-0.4-SUSE) seems to support signing negotiation.. at least the following command works just fine: smbclient -k -L //hostname turning signing off manually (-S off) ends up in the common error message cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have

Hallo, I've just installed Kernel 2.6.25.2 - works fine. But now when I use "smbmount" for mounting shares from my Win9x clients the system (kernel) tells me smbfs is deprecated and will be removed from the 2.6.27 kernel. Please migrate to cifs. But at least Win9x seems not to like cifs. Mounting via smbfs works since years, mounting (with the same options) via cifs

Sorry about the lengthy post - I'm putting as much in here as I can in hopes that someone can help me ferret out the problem. Basic problem is that domain users can't successfully log into the linux box. I'm trying to set this box up as an ltsp server authenticating against our existing AD (although this is actually in a test lab - I didn't really want to trash anything real

...g the UNIX extensions to the CIFS protocol can create symlinks to absolute paths which will be **followed** by the server. This functionality has been requested in order to correctly support certain applications when the user's home directory is mounted using some type of CIFS client (e.g. the cifsvfs in the Linux 2.6 kernel). If this behavior is not acceptable for your production environment you can set 'wide links = no' in the specific share declaration in the server's smb.conf. Be aware that disabling wide link support out of a share in Samba may impact the server's performa...

...g the UNIX extensions to the CIFS protocol can create symlinks to absolute paths which will be **followed** by the server. This functionality has been requested in order to correctly support certain applications when the user's home directory is mounted using some type of CIFS client (e.g. the cifsvfs in the Linux 2.6 kernel). If this behavior is not acceptable for your production environment you can set 'wide links = no' in the specific share declaration in the server's smb.conf. Be aware that disabling wide link support out of a share in Samba may impact the server's performa...

Sir, Sorry Sir (Gerald Carter). It was a typograhic mistake i came to know late. I am a student of computer science. I have in my course of study a project to be done. I am interested in doing project related to Samba. I have got one of the ideas for the project. Can anybody be kindly help me regarding this idea? Please do reply about this idea. In

...t find more detailed info. Of course, once disabled the "CIFS Unix extensions" on my Samba server, all the cases of "remote_uid" turned to "uid_OK". Also SuSE's "unknown_uid". More info: ---------- - man mount.cifs - http://samba.org/ftp/unpacked/cifsvfs/fs/cifs/README - https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-December/msg07408.html CONCLUSION ---------- This is just an experimental conclusion. If you want to mount the shares of your Samba server on any kind of Linux workstation and you cannot assert that this will have a "la...

I have a Samba 3 server, and a client with Samba 3. The server has a share for home directories, and the client is trying to mount it, but after it's mounted, I still can't create any symbolic links. Also, the GUI login (Red Hat Enterprise default) isn't working, but I think that's just a symptom of the symbolic and hard links not working. Any idea why, when I enable unix